Supreme Court of India
18,257 judgments
SVG FASHIONS PVT. LTD. v. RITU MURLI MANOHAR GOYAL
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act can extend limitation for insolvency claims and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
C. MANJAMMA & ANR. v. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
The Supreme Court restored the compensation awarded to the dependents of a deceased driver, holding that the Commissioner’s findings based on documentary evidence of death due to employment strain cannot be interfered with by the High Court absent perversity or substantial question of law.
C. Manjamma & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager
The Supreme Court restored the Commissioner’s award of compensation to the dependents of a deceased driver, holding that factual findings based on documentary evidence of employment-related death should not be disturbed by the High Court absent perversity or substantial question of law.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION v. SRI LANKAPPAAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, reaffirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction in civil appeals.
Master Ayush v. The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor paraplegic road accident victim, directing a liberal and comprehensive award covering future earnings, medical expenses, attendant charges, and loss of amenities.
Bata India Limited v. Workmen of Bata India Limited and Another
The Supreme Court held that deliberate "go slow" by workmen justifies pro-rata wage deductions but mandates a fair hearing before such deductions, directing payment of deducted wages and allowing management to take lawful action.
Bata India Limited v. Workmen of Bata India Limited and Another
The Supreme Court held that wage deductions for "go slow" work are permissible only after giving workmen a fair hearing, directing payment of deducted wages and allowing management to take lawful action thereafter.
RAM KRISHNA GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record to justify interference.
RAM KRISHNA GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition, holding no error apparent on record to warrant interference.
Mekha Ram and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to recover excess amounts paid to employees pursuant to an interim order later set aside, applying the principle of restitution and Section 144 CPC.
Mekha Ram and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to recover excess amounts paid pursuant to an interim order later set aside, applying the principle of restitution under Section 144 CPC.
Master Ayush v. The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor paraplegic road accident victim, applying liberal principles for permanent disability and directing structured disbursement to the guardian.
Delhi Development Authority v. Rajan Sood
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation tendered, and interim stay periods exclude from lapse computation, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's lapse declaration.
Delhi Development Authority v. Rajan Sood
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation tendered, and excluded stay periods from the lapse computation, overruling Pune Municipal Corporation and allowing the appeal of Delhi Development Authority.
M/s. IMPERIA STRUCTURE LTD. v. BRIG. HARIT PANT
The Supreme Court upheld that under Section 18 of the RERA Act, promoters must refund amounts with interest if possession is delayed and the allottee withdraws, dismissing appeals against consumer commission orders applying this principle.
Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur v. Mukesh Sharma
The Supreme Court held that long-serving contractual employees are entitled to regularization with continuity of service, but actual consequential benefits may be limited to three years prior to the writ petition filing to balance interests.
Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur and Anr. v. Mukesh Sharma
The Supreme Court held that long-serving contractual university employees are entitled to regularization with continuity of service but limited consequential benefits to three years prior to writ petitions, balancing employee rights and employer’s financial burden.
JORD ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. v. VALIA AND CO. (D) THR. LRS
The Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT order for non-hearing of the appellant and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the insolvency petition, affirming that notices by advocates are valid but pre-existing disputes must be considered.
JORD ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. v. VALIA AND CO. (D) THR. LRS
The Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT order for lack of hearing opportunity and remanded the insolvency appeal for fresh consideration, affirming that a lawyer-served demand notice is valid under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Saranpal Kaur Anand v. Praduman Singh Chandhok
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a suit as barred by limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, emphasizing the necessity of pleading specific facts to claim exemption under Section 17 of the Limitation Act and limiting reliance to the plaint's contents for such rejection.