Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

K. Ragupathi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that a contractual employee appointed after due selection and receiving regular benefits cannot be terminated without following principles of natural justice and ordered reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment natural justice termination due process

K. Raghupati v. Uttar Pradesh State and Others

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that termination of a contractual employee without due process is unlawful and directed reinstatement, clarifying protections for contractual appointees under service rules.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment termination of service due process punitive suspension

K. Ragupathi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a contractual employee appointed after due selection cannot be terminated without an enquiry, and reinstated the appellant whose services were discontinued without following natural justice.

employment appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment natural justice termination without enquiry due process

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that supply of electricity from a captive generating plant to a sister concern holding requisite ownership qualifies as own consumption under the Electricity Act, entitling open access and wheeling without surcharge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Captive generating plant Electricity Act, 2003 Open access Wheeling of power

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that supply of electricity from a captive generating plant to a sister concern holding requisite ownership and consumption qualifies as captive use under the Electricity Act, 2003 and Electricity Rules, 2005, dismissing the appeals against regulatory approvals for open access.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Captive Generating Plant Electricity Act 2003 Open Access Electricity Rules 2005

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Seema Sharma

12 May 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 560

The Supreme Court held that UGC pay scales under the 1990 Rules do not apply to Ayurvedic college employees governed by separate 1987 Rules, affirming the reasonableness of departmental pay classifications and limiting judicial interference in pay fixation policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant UGC scale of pay Madhya Pradesh Education Service Rules 1990 Ayush Department 1987 Recruitment Rules

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Seema Sharma

12 May 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that UGC pay scales under the 1990 Rules do not apply to Ayurvedic college employees governed by separate recruitment rules, affirming the government's policy-based classification in pay fixation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant UGC scale of pay Ayush Department Madhya Pradesh Education Service Rules equal pay for equal work

B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd. v. M/S JMS Steels and Power Corporation

11 May 2022 · Vineet Saran; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC where the appellant raised triable issues on liability, emphasizing that denial of leave is an exception reserved for frivolous or vexatious defences.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit leave to defend joint and several liability

Rajasthan State v. Eten Jef

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah · 2022 INSC 556

The Supreme Court held that concealment of criminal antecedents and false declaration in police recruitment applications disentitle a candidate from appointment, upholding the State's rejection of such candidature.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant concealment of criminal antecedents false declaration police recruitment verification process

State of Rajasthan v. Chetan Jeff

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that suppression of criminal antecedents and false declaration in recruitment applications disqualify a candidate from appointment as a constable, allowing the State's appeal to reject such candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suppression of criminal antecedents false declaration appointment to constable integrity and trustworthiness

Rajasthan State v. Chetan Jef

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that concealment of pending criminal cases in a police constable application form justifies rejection of candidature, overruling the High Court's direction to consider appointment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal antecedents concealment of facts police constable recruitment false declaration

State of Rajasthan v. Chetan Jeff

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that suppression of criminal antecedents in application forms for police constable posts disentitles a candidate from appointment, allowing the State's appeal against the High Court's direction to consider such candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suppression of criminal antecedents false declaration appointment to police constable integrity and trustworthiness

Naman Verma v. The Director, The Indian Institute of Technology Bombay & Ors.

11 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court declared the appellant as having successfully completed the Master of Design course under Article 142, affirming the High Court's legal findings on disability entitlement but validating her qualification.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Article 142 Constitution of India Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016

M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Maryadit, Pachama, District Sehore v. M/s. Modi Transport Service

11 May 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that without a clear written agreement by all parties, appointment of a commissioner to audit accounts is not arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, and the report is not an arbitral award binding on the parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 21 Arbitration Act 1940 appointment of commissioner arbitration agreement expert report

M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Maryadit, Pachama, District Sehore v. M/s. Modi Transport Service

11 May 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that the appointment of a Chartered Accountant to audit accounts and submit a report was a commissioner's appointment under CPC, not a reference to arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and set aside the arbitral award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 21 Arbitration Act 1940 Order XXVI CPC commissioner arbitration agreement consent to arbitration

Jacob K. Daniel v. Mahatma Gandhi University

11 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court held that the appellant's appointment as Lecturer at Mahatma Gandhi University was permanent, entitling him to full retiral and pensionary benefits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent appointment temporary appointment pay fixation retiral benefits

Dr. Jacob K. Daniel v. Mahatma Gandhi University

11 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia · (2019) 16 SCC 328

The Supreme Court held that the appellant’s appointment as Lecturer at Mahatma Gandhi University was permanent, entitling him to full retiral and pensionary benefits, and allowed his appeal against the Kerala High Court’s contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent appointment temporary appointment university employment pay fixation

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Goa

10 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a notification fixing minimum wages issued after due procedure cannot be corrected by an Errata Notification under Section 10 for non-existent clerical errors, quashing the Errata Notification and restoring the original wage notification.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 4(1) Section 10 Errata Notification

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Goa

10 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a duly issued minimum wage notification after due procedure cannot be corrected by an Errata Notification under Section 10 for substantive changes, quashing the Errata Notification and restoring the original wage fixation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 4(1)(i) Section 4(1)(iii) Section 10 correction

Biltu Bhattacharya v. State of West Bengal

10 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the conviction and sentence under Sections 302 read with 120-B of the IPC and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959, finding no error apparent on the record.

criminal petition_dismissed Review Petition Section 302 IPC Section 120-B IPC Section 27(3) Arms Act