Supreme Court of India
17,536 judgments
Naman Verma v. The Director, The Indian Institute of Technology Bombay & Ors.
The Supreme Court declared the appellant as having successfully completed the Master of Design course under Article 142, affirming the High Court's legal findings on disability entitlement but validating her qualification.
M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Maryadit, Pachama, District Sehore v. M/s. Modi Transport Service
The Supreme Court held that without a clear written agreement by all parties, appointment of a commissioner to audit accounts is not arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, and the report is not an arbitral award binding on the parties.
M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Maryadit, Pachama, District Sehore v. M/s. Modi Transport Service
The Supreme Court held that the appointment of a Chartered Accountant to audit accounts and submit a report was a commissioner's appointment under CPC, not a reference to arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and set aside the arbitral award accordingly.
Jacob K. Daniel v. Mahatma Gandhi University
The Supreme Court held that the appellant's appointment as Lecturer at Mahatma Gandhi University was permanent, entitling him to full retiral and pensionary benefits.
Dr. Jacob K. Daniel v. Mahatma Gandhi University
The Supreme Court held that the appellant’s appointment as Lecturer at Mahatma Gandhi University was permanent, entitling him to full retiral and pensionary benefits, and allowed his appeal against the Kerala High Court’s contrary decision.
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Goa
The Supreme Court held that a notification fixing minimum wages issued after due procedure cannot be corrected by an Errata Notification under Section 10 for non-existent clerical errors, quashing the Errata Notification and restoring the original wage notification.
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Goa
The Supreme Court held that a duly issued minimum wage notification after due procedure cannot be corrected by an Errata Notification under Section 10 for substantive changes, quashing the Errata Notification and restoring the original wage fixation.
Biltu Bhattacharya v. State of West Bengal
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the conviction and sentence under Sections 302 read with 120-B of the IPC and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959, finding no error apparent on the record.
Rekha Jain v. The State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against Rekha Jain under Section 420 IPC due to absence of any allegation of dishonest inducement by her, emphasizing that mere possession of property obtained by cheating does not constitute the offence.
Rekha Jain v. The State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against Rekha Jain under Section 420 IPC due to absence of any allegation of dishonest inducement by her, affirming that mere possession of property obtained by cheating does not constitute offence under Section 420 IPC.
Reshma Sultana v. The State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court upheld quashing of a fraudulent appointment but set aside the direction to appoint a non-recommended candidate, ordering a fresh selection process.
Veena Singh v. The District Registrar/Additional Collector
The Supreme Court held that denial of execution bars appeal under Section 72 of the Registration Act, requiring an enquiry under Sections 73 and 74, and that disputed fraud allegations in registration must be adjudicated by civil courts, dismissing the writ petition challenging registration of a sale deed.
University of Delhi v. Shashi Kiran
The Supreme Court held that employees who failed to opt by the cutoff date are deemed to have switched to the Pension Scheme, unauthorized extensions are invalid, but denying further options to switch to pension to certain employees was arbitrary and discriminatory.
RAM CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court held that the appellant's university appointment was valid despite alleged procedural irregularities, set aside his termination, and granted terminal benefits without back wages.
RAM CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court held that the appellant’s appointment as Reader was lawful as the Selection Committee was properly constituted with Chancellor’s nominees, quashed his termination, and directed payment of terminal benefits.
Suresh Mahajan v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
The Supreme Court directed immediate notification of local body elections in Madhya Pradesh without awaiting completion of reservation or delimitation formalities, upholding the constitutional mandate for timely elections under Articles 243-E and 243-U.
Savitaambadas Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, thereby upholding its earlier order rejecting the Special Leave Petition.
Savitaambadas Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition against the rejection of a Special Leave Petition, holding that no error apparent on record justified interference.
NEDUMPILLI FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. STATE OF KERALA
The Supreme Court held that NBFCs registered under the RBI Act are exclusively regulated by Chapter III-B and are not subject to State money lenders legislation, which is repugnant and inoperative to that extent.
Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Ravindra Kumar & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash land acquisition despite illegal invocation of the urgency clause, directing enhanced compensation under the 2013 Act for non-consenting landowners while denying relief to those who accepted prior compensation agreements.