Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya v. State of Gujarat

09 Jun 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court allowed the paternal grandparents' appeal, holding that custody of the minor child should remain with them as it better serves the child's welfare than custody with the maternal aunt.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody dispute welfare of child paternal grandparents maternal aunt

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya v. State of Gujarat

09 Jun 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that custody of a minor child who lost both parents should remain with the paternal grandparents, emphasizing the child's welfare over presumptions based on age or income.

family appeal_allowed Significant child custody welfare of child paternal grandparents maternal aunt

Rajput Vijaysinh Natwarsinh v. State of Gujarat

05 Jun 2022 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1129
Cites 0 · Cited by 17

The Supreme Court held that seized cash alleged to be proceeds of crime cannot be released before trial without conclusive proof of ownership, restoring lower courts' orders refusing release and directing custody pending trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 451 CrPC seized property muddamal proceeds of crime

Mahendra Singh and Ors v. State of M.P.

03 Jun 2022 · B.R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder, holding that conviction cannot rest solely on the testimony of a wholly unreliable eyewitness without reliable corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness testimony wholly unreliable witness corroboration medical evidence

Ardhendu Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of construction activities within the prohibited area of Shree Jagannath Temple for essential public amenities, rejecting the challenge under the Ancient Monuments Act and emphasizing statutory exclusions and public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 prohibited area construction National Monuments Authority

Vallal RCK v. M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that the adjudicating and appellate authorities must respect the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors approving withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC, allowing the appellant's Settlement Plan and setting aside liquidation orders.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors Commercial wisdom

Vallal RCK v. M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that judicial authorities cannot interfere with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC when approved by 90% voting share, and allowed the appellant's settlement plan withdrawal application.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors Commercial wisdom

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

03 Jun 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 635

The Supreme Court upheld prohibitions on mining within protected forests and mandated declaration of eco-sensitive zones up to 10 kilometers around national parks and sanctuaries to ensure ecological conservation under the Forest Conservation and Wildlife Protection Acts.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Eco-sensitive zones Jamua Ramgarh Sanctuary

Uttam v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges, holding that inconsistent and procedurally flawed dying declarations cannot safely sustain a conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 32 Evidence Act multiple dying declarations

Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu

01 Jun 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for the accused in a fatal protest incident, emphasizing victims' right to be heard and proper judicial discretion in bail proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant victim's right to be heard bail application Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C. Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Union of India v. Suresh Kumar Singh

01 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli · 2022 INSC 632
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the High Court's setting aside of departmental punishment due to procedural lapses including non-examination of vital witnesses.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice procedural irregularity non-examination of witnesses

Union of India v. Suresh Kumar Singh

01 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of departmental punishment due to procedural lapses, emphasizing the necessity of examining vital witnesses in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice procedural irregularity non-examination of witnesses

The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raghu Ramakrishna Raju Kanumuru

01 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that the National Green Tribunal cannot continue proceedings or pass orders conflicting with the High Court's interim order within its territorial jurisdiction, quashing the NGT's orders and directing the matter to be decided by the High Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal High Court jurisdiction territorial jurisdiction conflicting orders

State of U.P. v. Veerpal & Anr

30 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the conviction based on a credible dying declaration recorded by a Magistrate, holding that such declaration alone can sustain a murder conviction despite multiple inconsistent statements.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC multiple dying declarations magistrate recorded statement

State of U.P. v. Veerpal & Anr.

30 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on a credible dying declaration recorded by a Magistrate, overruling the High Court's acquittal due to inconsistent multiple dying declarations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC multiple dying declarations medical evidence

Terraform Magnum Limited v. The State of Maharashtra

30 May 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside restoration orders under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974, after invalidation of the sole Scheduled Tribe certificate foundational to the respondents' claim.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 Scheduled Tribe certificate Caste Scrutiny Committee land restoration

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr

30 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a Recovery Certificate holder is a financial creditor entitled to initiate CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC within three years from issuance of the certificate, overruling the NCLAT's time-barred finding.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Recovery Certificate Financial Debt Financial Creditor

Chandrapal v. State of Chhattisgarh

27 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Bela M. Trivedi · 2022 INSC 629
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt and reliance on weak extra judicial confession and last seen evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant homicidal death extra judicial confession last seen theory circumstantial evidence

Chandrapal v. State of Chhattisgarh

27 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to lack of proof of homicidal death and unreliable extra judicial confession, emphasizing that suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession homicidal death suicidal death

Rashidul Jafar @ Chota v. State of Uttar Pradesh

27 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2022 INSC 932
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court struck down the age restriction for premature release of life convicts in Uttar Pradesh, directing fair and expeditious consideration of all eligible prisoners under the original policy.

criminal petition_allowed Significant premature release life imprisonment policy amendment Article 21