Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Baiju K G & Ors v. Dr V P Joy

13 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant · 2022 INSC 575

The Supreme Court held that the State's failure to compensate Endosulfan victims and provide medical facilities violates fundamental rights and directed strict compliance with its 2017 order.

constitutional other Significant Endosulfan Compensation Fundamental Rights Article 21

Baiju K G & Ors v. Dr V P Joy

13 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that the Kerala Government's failure to compensate and provide medical treatment to Endosulfan victims violates their fundamental rights under Article 21 and directed strict compliance with its 2017 order.

constitutional other Significant Endosulfan compensation fundamental rights Article 21

Ibrat Faizan v. Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited

13 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 25

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Article 227 are maintainable against National Commission orders passed in appeals under Section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, affirming the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction while emphasizing its limited scope.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 58(1)(a)(iii)

Ibrat Faizan v. Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited

13 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Article 227 are maintainable before High Courts against National Commission orders passed in appeals under Section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, affirming the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over such tribunals.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Article 227 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Consumer Protection Act 2019 jurisdiction

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Narendra Jayantilal Trivedi

13 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions against SARFAESI Act orders are not maintainable, quashed the High Court's interim stay that stalled recovery, and condemned abuse of court process to delay bank dues recovery.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Article 226 writ petition maintainability

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Narendra Jayantilal Trivedi

13 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act and DRT orders are not maintainable, quashed the High Court's interim stay that stalled recovery proceedings, and condemned abuse of process by delaying tactics.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Debts Recovery Tribunal Article 226

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Dharmesh S. Jain

12 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held the respondents guilty of wilful disobedience of its and the High Court's orders, imposed a conditional sentence of simple imprisonment and fine, allowing time to comply or settle the dispute.

civil sentence_modified contempt of court wilful disobedience Contempt of Courts Act quantum of sentence

PTC India Financial Services Limited v. Venkateswarlu Kari and Another

12 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Depositories Act and SEBI Regulations do not override the mandatory provisions of the Indian Contract Act relating to pledge, affirming the pawnee's obligation to give notice before sale and the pawnor's right to redeem pledged shares until actual sale.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pledge Indian Contract Act, 1872 Depositories Act, 1996 SEBI Regulations

PTC India Financial Services Limited v. Venkateswarlu Kari and Another

12 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Depositories Act and SEBI Regulations override the Indian Contract Act's pledge provisions for dematerialized shares, validating the pawnee's acquisition of beneficial ownership and dismissing the appeal challenging this in insolvency proceedings.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Depositories Act, 1996 Indian Contract Act, 1872 pledge Section 176 Contract Act

Kausalya Bhoi v. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

12 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal after setting aside the High Court's unreasoned reduction of the amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Compensation High Court Modification of award

Anjana Saraiya v. The State of U.P. & Ors.

12 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to set aside the cancellation of a residential plot allotment due to delayed payments, directing payment of compensation to regularize the allotment.

property appeal_allowed Significant allotment cancellation payment of instalments Middle-Income Group Scheme compensation for delayed payment

K. Ragupathi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that a contractual employee appointed after due selection and receiving regular benefits cannot be terminated without following principles of natural justice and ordered reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment natural justice termination due process

K. Ragupathi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a contractual employee appointed after due selection cannot be terminated without an enquiry, and reinstated the appellant whose services were discontinued without following natural justice.

employment appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment natural justice termination without enquiry due process

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that supply of electricity from a captive generating plant to a sister concern holding requisite ownership qualifies as own consumption under the Electricity Act, entitling open access and wheeling without surcharge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Captive generating plant Electricity Act, 2003 Open access Wheeling of power

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission

12 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that supply of electricity from a captive generating plant to a sister concern holding requisite ownership and consumption qualifies as captive use under the Electricity Act, 2003 and Electricity Rules, 2005, dismissing the appeals against regulatory approvals for open access.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Captive Generating Plant Electricity Act 2003 Open Access Electricity Rules 2005

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Seema Sharma

12 May 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 560

The Supreme Court held that UGC pay scales under the 1990 Rules do not apply to Ayurvedic college employees governed by separate 1987 Rules, affirming the reasonableness of departmental pay classifications and limiting judicial interference in pay fixation policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant UGC scale of pay Madhya Pradesh Education Service Rules 1990 Ayush Department 1987 Recruitment Rules

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Seema Sharma

12 May 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that UGC pay scales under the 1990 Rules do not apply to Ayurvedic college employees governed by separate recruitment rules, affirming the government's policy-based classification in pay fixation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant UGC scale of pay Ayush Department Madhya Pradesh Education Service Rules equal pay for equal work

B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd. v. M/S JMS Steels and Power Corporation

11 May 2022 · Vineet Saran; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court allowed leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC where the appellant raised triable issues on liability, emphasizing that denial of leave is an exception reserved for frivolous or vexatious defences.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit leave to defend joint and several liability

State of Rajasthan v. Chetan Jeff

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that suppression of criminal antecedents and false declaration in recruitment applications disqualify a candidate from appointment as a constable, allowing the State's appeal to reject such candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suppression of criminal antecedents false declaration appointment to constable integrity and trustworthiness

State of Rajasthan v. Chetan Jeff

11 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that suppression of criminal antecedents in application forms for police constable posts disentitles a candidate from appointment, allowing the State's appeal against the High Court's direction to consider such candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suppression of criminal antecedents false declaration appointment to police constable integrity and trustworthiness