Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

BBR (India) Private Limited v. S.P. Singla Constructions Private Limited

18 May 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the jurisdictional seat of arbitration fixed by the first arbitrator remains exclusive and cannot be changed by the appointment of a new arbitrator or change of venue without mutual consent of the parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant seat of arbitration venue of arbitration jurisdiction Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Rajpal Singh v. Saroj

18 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a suit for cancellation of a sale deed is barred by limitation if filed beyond three years from knowledge, protecting a bona fide purchaser against a collusive decree, and restored the appellate court’s dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant collusive decree limitation period cancellation of sale deed bona fide purchaser

Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association v. Union of India

18 May 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2022 INSC 586
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the National Green Tribunal Act, affirmed that High Courts retain writ jurisdiction over NGT decisions, and dismissed the petition challenging the location of the NGT Bench at Bhopal.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 High Court jurisdiction Article 226 Article 227

Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association v. Union of India

18 May 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the National Green Tribunal Act, affirming that the NGT does not oust High Courts' writ jurisdiction and that direct appeals to the Supreme Court under the Act are valid, while rejecting the petitioners' plea to relocate the NGT Bench from Bhopal to Jabalpur.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 High Court jurisdiction Article 226 Article 227

K. Srinivasappa & Ors. v. M. Mallamma & Ors.

18 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 587

The Supreme Court restored a Lok Adalat compromise decree, holding that allegations of fraud to set aside such decree must be strictly proved and cannot be overturned by a High Court without reasoned findings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lok Adalat compromise decree fraud Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC

K. Srinivasappa & Ors. v. M. Mallamma & Ors.

18 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored a Lok Adalat compromise decree set aside by the High Court, holding that fraud allegations must be strictly proved and reasoned orders are essential to set aside such final and binding awards.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lok Adalat compromise decree fraud Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC

A.G. Perarivalan v. State, Through Superintendent of Police

18 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Governor must act on the binding advice of the State Cabinet in remission matters under Article 161 and cannot refer remission recommendations to the President, directing the release of the appellant after prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 161 Constitution Governor's discretion Remission of sentence Executive power

A.G. Perarivalan v. State, Through Superintendent of Police

18 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Governor must act on the binding advice of the State Cabinet under Article 161 for remission of sentence and cannot refer such recommendation to the President, directing the immediate release of the appellant after prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 161 Constitution Governor remission power State Cabinet advice binding Executive power remission

Harnek Singh v. Gurmit Singh

18 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court held that the laparoscopic surgeon and hospital were negligent in failing to detect and treat post-operative bowel and bile duct injuries, awarding compensation for deficiency of medical service.

medical negligence / consumer protection / civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence deficiency of service laparoscopic cholecystectomy iatrogenic injury

Harnek Singh v. Gurmit Singh

18 May 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the laparoscopic surgeon and hospital were negligent in failing to detect and treat post-operative bowel and bile duct injuries, allowing the appeal and awarding compensation to the complainants.

medical negligence / consumer protection / civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence deficiency of service laparoscopic cholecystectomy iatrogenic injury

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK v. M/S RCM INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

18 May 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that enforcement of security interests and sale of secured assets under SARFAESI Act during CIRP moratorium is prohibited, and such sales completed post moratorium initiation are liable to be set aside.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 SARFAESI Act, 2002 moratorium security interest enforcement

Maha P. & Ors. v. The State of Kerala & Ors.

18 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Bela M Trivedi · 2022 INSC 585

The Supreme Court upheld the transfer of vacant NRI quota seats to the general state quota in Kerala private medical colleges, dismissing the appellants' plea for fresh registration and relying on unchallenged prospectus provisions and binding precedents.

education appeal_dismissed Significant NRI quota vacant seats seat conversion unaided private medical colleges

Maha P. & Ors. v. The State of Kerala & Ors.

18 May 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Bela M Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the transfer of vacant NRI quota seats to the unreserved category in Kerala private medical colleges, dismissing appellants' claims for extension and fresh registration based on the admission prospectus and prior case law.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NRI quota vacant seats private medical colleges seat transfer

Rushibhai Jagdishchandra Pathak v. Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation

18 May 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that employees are entitled to pay-scale arrears for three years prior to filing writ petitions with interest, rejecting claims barred by delay and laches.

labor appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches continuing wrong recurring wrong pay-scale revision

Rushibhai Jagdishchandra Pathak v. Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation

18 May 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees are entitled to higher pay-scales as per accepted Scheme interpretation but restricted arrears to three years prior to writ filing, applying delay and laches principles in service law.

labor appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches limitation pay-scale upgradation service law

Balwan Singh v. State of Haryana

18 May 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 593

The Supreme Court clarified the principles for determining compensation in land acquisition cases, emphasizing appropriate deductions on sale exemplars and rejecting post-notification developments for enhancing compensation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation determination Sale exemplars Cut/deduction on land value

Balwan Singh v. State of Haryana

18 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court clarified the principles for applying percentage cuts on sale exemplars in land acquisition compensation, restored higher cuts for large agricultural lands, and upheld differentiated compensation based on land location and potential.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation determination Sale exemplars Percentage cut

Satish Kumar Jatav v. The State of U.P.

17 May 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic order quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders when serious offences are involved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings summoning order reasoned order

The State of Karnataka v. G. Ramanarayana Joshi

17 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's right to restoration of forfeited land under Karnataka Land Revenue Rules despite its transfer to the Forest Department, emphasizing continued possession and non-disposal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant forfeiture of land restoration of land Karnataka Land Revenue Rules 1966 sub-rule (2) Rule 119

The State of Karnataka v. G. Ramanarayana Joshi

17 May 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's right to restoration of forfeited land under amended Rule 119 of Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, rejecting the State's contention that transfer to the Forest Department barred restoration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant forfeiture of land restoration of land Karnataka Land Revenue Rules 1966 sub-rule (2) Rule 119