Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. K. Rajashekhara Reddy

14 Jun 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 645

The Supreme Court held that the six-month limit for re-medical examination under CSE Rules is ordinarily binding but allowed relief under Article 142 to a candidate found medically fit after delay caused by procedural changes.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Civil Services Examination Rules 2014 re-medical examination temporarily unfit six months period

Union of India v. K. Rajashekhara Reddy

14 Jun 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the six-month period for re-medical examination under CSE Rules 2014 is a maximum limit, disallowed late requests without exceptional grounds, but directed appointment of the candidate based on subsequent medical fitness under its plenary powers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Civil Services Examination Rules 2014 re-medical examination temporarily unfit six months period

Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan & Anr. v. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan & Ors.

13 Jun 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that long cohabitation raises a presumption of marriage and legitimacy, entitling the plaintiff to partition rights, and directed prompt final decree proceedings in partition suits to prevent delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant presumption of marriage legitimacy long cohabitation partition suit

Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan & Anr. v. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan & Ors.

13 Jun 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that long cohabitation raises a presumption of marriage under Section 114 of the Evidence Act, entitling the child to inheritance, and directed Trial Courts to promptly proceed with final decree proceedings in partition suits to avoid delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant presumption of marriage legitimacy long cohabitation Section 114 Indian Evidence Act

Somakka v. K.P. Basavaraj

13 Jun 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that occupancy rights under the Inam Act are heritable and that the first appellate court must properly consider evidence and provide reasons, restoring the appellant's half share in the disputed property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant occupancy rights Inam Act partition first appellate court

Somakka v. K.P. Basavaraj

13 Jun 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court restored the appellant's half share in the occupancy-rights property, holding that appellate courts must fully consider evidence and give reasons under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 31 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant occupancy rights Inam Act heritable rights partition suit

Dr. Astha Goel v. The Medical Counselling Committee

10 Jun 2022 · M.R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 641

The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking an additional counselling round to fill vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats, holding that admission schedules must be strictly adhered to preserve medical education quality and public health.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET-PG-2021 medical education postgraduate admissions counselling rounds

Dr. Astha Goel v. The Medical Counselling Committee

10 Jun 2022 · M.R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 640

The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking an additional counselling round to fill vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats, holding that adherence to the prescribed admission schedule is mandatory and mid-term admissions are impermissible.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET-PG-2021 medical counselling vacant seats special stray round

Dr. Astha Goel v. The Medical Counselling Committee

10 Jun 2022 · M.R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking an additional counselling round to fill vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats, holding that the prescribed admission schedule must be strictly followed and mid-term admissions are impermissible.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET-PG-2021 medical counselling vacant seats special stray round

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya v. State of Gujarat

09 Jun 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court allowed the paternal grandparents' appeal, holding that custody of the minor child should remain with them as it better serves the child's welfare than custody with the maternal aunt.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody dispute welfare of child paternal grandparents maternal aunt

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya v. State of Gujarat

09 Jun 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that custody of a minor child who lost both parents should remain with the paternal grandparents, emphasizing the child's welfare over presumptions based on age or income.

family appeal_allowed Significant child custody welfare of child paternal grandparents maternal aunt

Rajput Vijaysinh Natwarsinh v. State of Gujarat

05 Jun 2022 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1129
Cites 0 · Cited by 18

The Supreme Court held that seized cash alleged to be proceeds of crime cannot be released before trial without conclusive proof of ownership, restoring lower courts' orders refusing release and directing custody pending trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 451 CrPC seized property muddamal proceeds of crime

Mahendra Singh and Ors v. State of M.P.

03 Jun 2022 · B.R. Gavai; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder, holding that conviction cannot rest solely on the testimony of a wholly unreliable eyewitness without reliable corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness testimony wholly unreliable witness corroboration medical evidence

Ardhendu Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of construction activities within the prohibited area of Shree Jagannath Temple for essential public amenities, rejecting the challenge under the Ancient Monuments Act and emphasizing statutory exclusions and public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 prohibited area construction National Monuments Authority

Vallal RCK v. M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that the adjudicating and appellate authorities must respect the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors approving withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC, allowing the appellant's Settlement Plan and setting aside liquidation orders.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors Commercial wisdom

Vallal RCK v. M/s Siva Industries and Holdings Limited

03 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that judicial authorities cannot interfere with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC when approved by 90% voting share, and allowed the appellant's settlement plan withdrawal application.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors Commercial wisdom

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

03 Jun 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 635

The Supreme Court upheld prohibitions on mining within protected forests and mandated declaration of eco-sensitive zones up to 10 kilometers around national parks and sanctuaries to ensure ecological conservation under the Forest Conservation and Wildlife Protection Acts.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Eco-sensitive zones Jamua Ramgarh Sanctuary

Uttam v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges, holding that inconsistent and procedurally flawed dying declarations cannot safely sustain a conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 32 Evidence Act multiple dying declarations

Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu

01 Jun 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for the accused in a fatal protest incident, emphasizing victims' right to be heard and proper judicial discretion in bail proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant victim's right to be heard bail application Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C. Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Union of India v. Suresh Kumar Singh

01 Jun 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli · 2022 INSC 632
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, upholding the High Court's setting aside of departmental punishment due to procedural lapses including non-examination of vital witnesses.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice procedural irregularity non-examination of witnesses