Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Sanghi Industries Limited v. Ravin Cables Ltd.

30 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that interim orders under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act directing deposit of amounts already paid under invoked bank guarantees are impermissible without satisfying CPC safeguards, and set aside such orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act performance bank guarantee Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC interim relief

EMAAR INDIA LTD v. TARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP

30 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that courts must conduct a preliminary inquiry into arbitrability under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act before appointing arbitrators when disputes fall under an exclusion clause, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement arbitrability Section 11 Arbitration Act preliminary inquiry

EMAAR INDIA LTD v. TARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP

30 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that courts must conduct a preliminary inquiry on arbitrability before appointing arbitrators under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act when a dispute falls under an express non-arbitrable clause, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitrability Section 11 Arbitration Act Clause 36 exclusion Clause 37 arbitration

State of Maharashtra v. Madhuri Maruti Vidhate

30 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a married daughter is not entitled to compassionate appointment as it is a concession for dependent family members to relieve sudden financial distress, and set aside the orders directing such appointment after a long delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment married daughter dependency public service recruitment

State of Maharashtra v. Madhuri Maruti Vidhate

30 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a married daughter is not entitled to compassionate appointment years after the death of the government employee, emphasizing that such appointments are a humanitarian exception for immediate dependents in financial crisis.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment married daughter dependents government service

The State of Maharashtra v. Mr. Aspi Chinoy and Another

30 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that Government Resolutions on concessional land allotment to Co-operative Societies do not apply when land is leased to a builder who sells flats on ownership basis and purchasers form a Society, dismissing the State's appeal against registration of flat transfers without a No Objection Certificate.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Co-operative Society Government Resolution 1983 Government Resolution 1999 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Bashiroddin & Ors. v. Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation & Anr.

30 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court clarified that land acquisition compensation must be released 50% without security and 50% with security as per its order, rejecting MTDC's attempt to withdraw excess deposited amount and allowing appellants to receive full entitled compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition enhanced compensation deposit and withdrawal security

Bashiroddin & Ors. v. Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation & Anr.

30 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court held that the entire enhanced compensation must be disbursed to land losers with 50% released without security and 50% on furnishing security, rejecting MTDC's claim to withdraw mistakenly deposited excess amount.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition enhanced compensation deposit and disbursal security for compensation

Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Gaushala v. State of Maharashtra

30 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli · 2022 INSC 1045

The Supreme Court held that seized cattle must be handed over to animal welfare organizations pending trial under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, emphasizing the Magistrate's discretion and the need for expeditious trials to protect animal welfare.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act interim custody animal welfare proviso to Section 8(3)

Executive Engineer (R and B) and Others v. Gokul Chandra Kanungo

30 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court reduced the exorbitant 18% interest awarded by the arbitrator to 9% per annum and disallowed interest for periods of respondent's inaction, emphasizing reasoned exercise of discretion under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration Act and the Court's power under Article 142 to ensure justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(a) interest pendente lite pre-award interest

Ajwar v. Niyaj Ahmad

30 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s bail order in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders considering the gravity of offence and accused’s role before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences murder Article 21

Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Gaushala v. State of Maharashtra

30 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that seized cattle must be handed over to animal welfare organizations pending trial under the mandatory proviso to Section 8(3) of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, setting aside the High Court's order granting custody to the owners.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act interim custody animal welfare seizure of cattle

Sukhbiri Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a declaratory suit as barred by limitation, affirming that limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2(2) CPC when facts are admitted, and Article 136 of the Limitation Act does not extend limitation for such suits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation Order XIV Rule 2(2) CPC declaratory suit relinquishment deed

Sukhbiri Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a declaratory suit as barred by limitation, holding that limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue when foundational facts are admitted and that Article 136 of the Limitation Act does not extend limitation for such suits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation Order XIV Rule 2(2) CPC declaratory suit relinquishment deed

X ... v. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; J B Pardiwala · 2022 INSC 1035
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies up to twenty-four weeks under Rule 3B of the MTP Rules, affirming reproductive autonomy and equality under the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B unmarried women abortion rights

X ... v. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

29 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; J B Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act and Rules, interpreting Rule 3B purposively to uphold constitutional equality and reproductive autonomy.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B unmarried women reproductive rights

Ritu Rai v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

29 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; J. B. Pardiwala · 2022 INSC 1040

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's order allowing summoning of a school authority to verify the appellant's age, holding that the High Court erred in setting aside the order without sufficient cause.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Trial Court discretion Summoning witness Admissibility of evidence

NIRENDRA NATH KAR v. GOPAL NAVIN BHAI DAVE

29 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B.V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 1039

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant lacked locus standi to challenge the striking off of a defunct company's name and that restoration was not justified after long lapse and procedural non-compliance.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 560 striking off restoration of company name

NIRENDRA NATH KAR v. GOPAL NAVIN BHAI DAVE

29 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that a person whose directorship is not established from official records lacks locus standi to seek restoration of a company’s name struck off under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 560 striking off restoration of company name

M/s. Jindal Steel and Power Limited v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission

29 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld cancellation of JSPL's distribution licence for non-compliance with mandatory minimum area and supply obligations under the Electricity Act, 2003, affirming the regulatory framework for electricity distribution licences.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 distribution licence minimum area of supply captive power plant