Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

ANKITA BHATI v. DEV RAJ SINGH BHATI

13 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 643

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of both divorce and related criminal proceedings from Rajasthan to Himachal Pradesh, prioritizing the wife's convenience and judicial efficiency in matrimonial disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant transfer petition matrimonial dispute convenience of wife criminal case transfer

Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Singh

13 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 620
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken before the 2013 Act's commencement, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order directing compensation under the 2013 Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Deemed lapse of acquisition

State of Orissa v. Laxmi Narayan Das

12 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 619

The Supreme Court dismissed a belated writ petition challenging final land records due to delay, concealment of material facts, and non-maintainability after suit withdrawal, emphasizing the doctrine of delay and laches and the need for clean hands in litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches writ petition maintainability constructive res judicata concealment of facts

Mangilal v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Jul 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023 INSC 634
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory Section 52A safeguards, non-production of seized narcotics, hostile witnesses, and procedural irregularities undermining the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure disposal of narcotics

Sivanandan C T and Others v. High Court of Kerala and Others

12 Jul 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy; Pamidighantam Sri... · 2023 INSC 709
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Kerala High Court’s post-examination imposition of a viva-voce cut-off violated statutory rules and the petitioners’ legitimate expectation, rendering the decision arbitrary and unconstitutional, but declined to unseat already appointed judges due to public interest.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant legitimate expectation Kerala Higher Judicial Service viva-voce cut-off Article 14

The State of Kerala v. M. Karunakaran

11 Jul 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court adjourned the appeal challenging acquittal in a corruption case pending a larger bench's decision on whether guilt can be inferred without direct evidence of demand and acceptance under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal other Procedural Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) demand and acceptance corruption conviction

The State of Kerala v. M. Karunakaran

11 Jul 2023 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court adjourned the appeal challenging acquittal under the Prevention of Corruption Act pending a larger bench decision on whether conviction can rest on inferential evidence in absence of direct proof of demand and acceptance.

criminal other Procedural Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) demand and acceptance inferential evidence

Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India

11 Jul 2023 · B.R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 616
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court upheld legislative amendments permitting incremental extensions of tenure for the Director of Enforcement and Director of CBI, dismissing challenges that such extensions undermine institutional independence and violate prior court orders.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 Fundamental Rules, 1922 Director of Enforcement

Ravi Khandelwal v. Taluka Stores

11 Jul 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the five-year statutory bar on instituting eviction suits protects tenants for that period but does not indefinitely bar adjudication of suits instituted within that period, allowing eviction after prolonged litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Premises Act 1950 Section 14(3) eviction suit limitation tenant protection

RAVI KHANDELWAL v. M/S. TALUKA STORES

11 Jul 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 615
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the five-year bar on filing eviction suits under Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises Act is a temporary restriction that ceases after the period elapses, allowing a prematurely filed suit pending beyond five years to be entertained and decreed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 14(3) Rajasthan Premises Act eviction suit limitation tenant protection purposive interpretation

Priya Pramod Gajbe v. State of Maharashtra

11 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 663
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that authentic pre-Constitutional documents establish Scheduled Tribe status and the Affinity Test cannot be the sole basis to reject such claims, allowing the appellant's claim to belong to the Mana Scheduled Tribe.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe status Affinity Test Pre-Constitutional documents Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 384
Cites 0 · Cited by 41

The Supreme Court held that police must register FIRs and conduct proper investigations into the suspicious deaths of two IIT Delhi students alleging caste-based atrocities, setting aside the High Court's refusal to direct FIR registration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR registration Section 154 CrPC Section 174 CrPC SC/ST (POA) Act 1989

Pratibha Manchanda v. State of Haryana

07 Jul 2023 · Surya Kant; C.T. Ravikumar · 2023 INSC 612
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted in a land forgery case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and ordering a Special Investigation Team to ensure a thorough probe.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail forgery power of attorney land fraud

SRI LAKSHMANA GOWDA B.N. v. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

07 Jul 2023 · Surya Kant; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 611

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by accepting credible evidence of higher income and greater disability, applying the multiplier method and awarding damages for loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation permanent disability loss of future income

Vinod Kumar v. District Magistrate Mau

07 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that disputes regarding apportionment of compensation under the National Highways Authority Act, 1956 must be referred to the Principal Civil Court, and the District Magistrate has no jurisdiction to decide such disputes.

property appeal_allowed Significant National Highways Authority Act, 1956 land acquisition compensation apportionment District Magistrate jurisdiction

Mohd. Naushad v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of key accused in the 1996 Lajpat Nagar bomb blast case, commuted death sentence to life imprisonment, and affirmed principles on circumstantial evidence, confessional statements, and admissibility of pointing out.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence confessional statement pointing out Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

06 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol; Aravind Kumar · 2023INSC607
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board's unreasonable delay in approving the appellant's application to reduce contracted electricity demand was arbitrary under Article 14, entitling the appellant to a refund of excess charges paid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual delay reasonable time Article 14 electricity supply agreement

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 608

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income without deductions for uncertainties or personal expenses, applying correct multipliers, and awarding additional damages for attendant care, future medical expenses, and other heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier method

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav & Ors.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by holding that permanent disability entails 100% income loss without personal expenses deduction and awarded adequate damages for attendant care, future medical expenses, and other heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability income loss personal expenses deduction

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in motor accident claims by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income, applying correct multipliers, disallowing certain deductions, and awarding additional heads of damages including attendant charges and loss of consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier