Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Anbazhagan v. The State

20 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 632
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from culpable homicide punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that only knowledge and not intention to cause death was proved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide murder intention knowledge

राज्य राजधानी दिल्ली सरकार v. भारत संघ

20 Jul 2023 · Dhananjay Y. Chandrachud; P. S. Narasimha; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court dismissed the challenge to the NCT Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023, holding that Parliament has plenary power under Article 239AA to legislate for Delhi, but referred key constitutional questions to a larger Bench.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 239AA NCT Delhi governance Parliamentary plenary power Legislative competence

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jul 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj... · 2023 INSC 635

The Supreme Court referred to a Constitution Bench the question of Parliament’s power under Article 239-AA(7) to amend the governance structure of Delhi through the 2023 Ordinance, dismissing interim relief but leaving the ultimate validity undecided.

constitutional other Significant Article 239-AA Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance 2023 Legislative competence Executive power

Shatrughan v. State of Chhattisgarh

20 Jul 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 630

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable prosecution evidence, inconsistent medical findings, and absence of motive, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence medical evidence

Konprob Master v. West Bengal State

19 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bharadwaj; Dinkar Dutta · 2023 INSC 570

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Sections 419, 353, 447, and 120B IPC, holding that continuation of the case would amount to abuse of process and harassment.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC false allegations abuse of process

9408d6fb3b97c891ad9d2543f7a282a30ffca8950f8994e3a04a0bf3dae881ee

19 Jul 2023 · Rabindra Bhattacharya; Dinkar Dutta

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Sections 419, 353, 447, and 120B IPC, holding that no prima facie case was made out and the complaint was an abuse of the legal process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC criminal breach of trust trespass

Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat

19 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; A. S. Bopanna; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 637

The Supreme Court allowed bail to the appellant in a forgery and evidence fabrication case, emphasizing that detailed evidence examination is impermissible at bail stage and that bail can be granted considering risk factors and prior interim bail orders.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail prima facie case Section 194 IPC Section 468 IPC

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Meer Baksh

19 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 638

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal holding that property cannot be declared evacuee property when the original holder never left India, affirming the High Court's orders.

property appeal_dismissed evacuee property Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 Section 2(f) Section 2(d)

Boini Mahipal and Anr v. State of Telangana

19 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 629

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants for lack of evidence proving their overt acts in assault, holding mere presence insufficient for conviction under Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention vicarious liability conviction

P. YUVAPRAKASH v. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

18 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2023 INSC 676

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of POCSO and related charges, holding that medical evidence established the victim was not a minor and that no penetrative sexual assault or forceful abduction was proved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act age determination ossification test Section 164 CrPC statement

Yashodhan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

18 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 652

The Supreme Court held that no prior hearing is mandatory before summoning a person as accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., dismissing the appeal against the summoning order.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning additional accused right to hearing natural justice

Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement

18 Jul 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 1006

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of bail to an accused in a money laundering case, emphasizing the mandatory twin conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA and the serious nature of economic offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 45 PMLA bail conditions money laundering offence economic offences bail

INDRA BAI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANOTHER

17 Jul 2023 · Manoj Misra; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 624
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that permanent total disablement under the Employee’s Compensation Act is determined by functional incapacity to perform the original work, restoring full compensation for a labourer whose left hand was rendered useless in an accident.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 total disablement permanent disability functional incapacity

Arvind Kumar v. State of NCT Delhi

17 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bandal

The Supreme Court reclassified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, holding that negligent accidental discharge of a firearm causing death attracts liability under Section 304 IPC, not Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Accidental discharge Culpable homicide

Arvind Kumar v. State of NCT, Delhi

17 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 622

The Supreme Court overturned the murder conviction and held the appellant guilty of causing death by negligence under Section 304A IPC due to accidental firing of a firearm.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304A IPC accidental firing negligence

PASCHIMANCHALVIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD v. RAMAN ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED

17 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DIPANKAR DATTA · 2023 INSC 625
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 overrides the Electricity Act, 2003 in insolvency liquidation proceedings, requiring electricity dues to be realized through the IBC's priority scheme.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Electricity Act, 2003 secured creditor operational creditor

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Shyam Bihari & Others

17 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 623

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused policemen in a murder case due to lack of conclusive evidence linking them to the fatal shot, emphasizing the benefit of doubt and reliability of eyewitness and ballistic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Acquittal Benefit of doubt Eyewitness identification Ballistic evidence

RANJEET SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

13 Jul 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 636

The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, emphasizing the need for credible and corroborated evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness credibility FIR

Mathyu Alexander v. Muhammad Shafi & Ors.

13 Jul 2023 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order quashing the final investigation report in a fatal motor accident case, emphasizing proper application of criminal procedural law and standards of proof for negligence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant final investigation report Section 173(8) CrPC Section 482 CrPC negligence

Mathew Alexander v. Mohammed Shafi

13 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 621
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing a final report after further investigation by making findings of fact, and clarified that such reports should not be quashed on merits, while emphasizing the distinct standards of proof in criminal and compensation claims.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) CrPC Section 482 CrPC final report quashing rash and negligent driving