Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Nk Gursewak Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 648
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, modifying the sentence to the period already served.

criminal sentence_modified Significant exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder sudden fight heat of passion

Dilip Kumar v. Brajraj Shrivastava & Anr.

26 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 670

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate must record statements of all witnesses named in a complaint before dismissing it under Section 203 Cr.P.C., and upheld the High Court's remand for proper inquiry.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 202 Cr.P.C. Section 203 Cr.P.C. complaint dismissal Magistrate inquiry

Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v. Suresh Chand Jain

26 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court held that special leave petitions under Article 136 against NCDRC orders are not maintainable as a matter of routine and must be preceded by exhaustion of alternative remedies under the Consumer Protection Act or writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 136 Constitution of India Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer Protection Act 2019 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

M/S UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SURESH CHAND JAIN & ANR.

26 Jul 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 649
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Article 136 lie only against original orders of the National Consumer Commission and directed the petitioner to approach the High Court under Articles 226/227 to challenge appellate orders, dismissing the Special Leave Petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 136 Constitution Consumer Protection Act 1986 Consumer Protection Act 2019 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Suresh Thipmppa Shetty v. State of Maharashtra

26 Jul 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court overturned the convictions of appellants for murder conspiracy due to reasonable doubt arising from acquittal of main accused and insufficient evidence linking them to the crime.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy murder reasonable doubt presumption of innocence

Hem Raj v. The New India Assurance Company Limited

25 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjwal Bhuyan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an insurer must pay medical expenses under a valid motor insurance policy if supported by credible evidence, allowing the appellant’s appeal to that extent with interest and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle insurance medical expenses claim consumer dispute redressal insurance repudiation

भारतीय कामगार कर्मचारी महासंघ v. मेसर्स जेट एअरवेज लिमिटेड

25 Jul 2023 · अभय एस. ओक; संजय करोल

The Supreme Court held that workers completing 240 days of continuous service under the Mumbai Model Standing Orders are entitled to permanent employment, overruling any inconsistent private settlements.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Mumbai Model Standing Orders Permanent employment Fixed-term contract

Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh v. M/s. Jet Airways Ltd.

25 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 646
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that certified Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 prevail over inconsistent settlements, entitling fixed-term contract workmen completing 240 days of service to permanency.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Bombay Model Standing Order permanency of workmen fixed-term contract

Vinod Kumar Sachdeva v. Aok Kumar Sachdeva & Ors.

25 Jul 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court held that arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only between parties to the arbitration agreement and set aside the High Court's order directing reference of all disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 8 Memorandum of Understanding Arbitration clause

Vinod Kumar Sachdeva v. Ashok Kumar Sachdeva

25 Jul 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 650

The Supreme Court held that disputes involving parties not signatories to an arbitration agreement cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and set aside the High Court's order directing such reference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 non-parties to arbitration agreement reference to arbitration

Chennupati Kranthi Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

25 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 645

The Supreme Court held that police cannot impound passports and set aside the High Court's condition requiring surrender of the wife's and son's passports for returning the appellant's passport, affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant passport impounding Section 91 Cr.P.C. Passports Act 1967 fundamental right to travel

Dhanraj N Asawani v. Amarjeetsingh Mohindersingh Basi

25 Jul 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 710

The Supreme Court held that Section 81(5B) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act does not bar any person other than the auditor or Registrar from lodging an FIR, and quashed the High Court's order that had invalidated such an FIR.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 81(5B) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act FIR registration Right to lodge FIR Special law vs CrPC

Mahendra Awase v. State of Madhya Pradesh

25 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 76
Cites 0 · Cited by 14

The Supreme Court held that mere harassment or loan recovery demands do not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC without clear evidence of instigation or intent, and discharged the accused from charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Mens rea Instigation

Rohit Bishnoi v. Rajasthan State and Others

24 Jul 2023 · B. V. Nagratna; Prashant Kumar Mishra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic bail orders in a murder case, emphasizing the need for reasoned bail decisions considering the gravity of offenses and prima facie evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC murder Section 302 IPC

Ram Kishan v. Manish Kumar

24 Jul 2023 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2023 INSC 640
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a civil suit and striking out of issues challenging the Delhi Cantonment Board's authority, affirming statutory bar under Section 250 of the Cantonments Act and rejecting relief for seal removal without approved building plan.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Cantonment Board Section 250 Cantonments Act Order XIV Rule 5 CPC Article 227 Constitution

Legal Representatives v. Manish Kumar

24 Jul 2023 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2023 INSC 640

The Supreme Court upheld the maintainability of a civil suit against the Delhi Cantonment Board’s jurisdiction and rejected a writ petition for de-sealing property without sanctioned building plans.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Cantonment Board jurisdiction building plan sanction Section 250 Cantonments Act

Gurbachan Singh v. Gurcharan Singh & Ors.

24 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC and upheld the finding of family partition and valid possession by the purchaser in a property dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 100 CPC second appeal substantial question of law family partition

Gurbachan Singh (Dead) v. Gurcharan Singh (Dead)

24 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 639
Cites 5 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision recognizing partition effected by the father and affirmed the purchaser’s right to possession, dismissing the appeal challenging concurrent findings of fact.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant property dispute partition co-sharer possession

The State of West Bengal v. Suvendu Adhikari

24 Jul 2023 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 647

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order transferring investigation of multiple FIRs involving explosive substances to the NIA under Section 6(5) of the NIA Act, affirming the Central Government's suo moto power to direct such investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Section 6(5) suo moto power transfer of investigation

BHIM RAO BASWANTH RAO PATIL v. K. MADAN MOHAN RAO

24 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2023 INSC 641
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's application to reject an election petition alleging non-disclosure of criminal antecedents, holding that such disputes require full trial and that only cases mandatorily disclosed under Section 33A of the Representation of People Act must be considered at the rejection stage.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Election petition Representation of People Act, 1951 Section 33A Order VII Rule 11 CPC