Supreme Court of India

16,876 judgments

Year:

M/s Triveni Glass Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P.

09 Oct 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of 15% trade tax on tinted glass sheets, holding they are distinct from plain glass panes and fall under "all goods and wares made of glass" as per the relevant notification.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant tinted glass sheets plain glass panes trade tax classification Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948

M/s. Kewal Court Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. The State of West Bengal and Ors.

09 Oct 2023 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court referred for Larger Bench the authoritative interpretation of 'vacant land' under Section 2(q)(i) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, resolving conflicting precedents on exclusion of land where construction is not permissible.

property other Significant vacant land Urban Land Ceiling Act Section 2(q)(i) building regulations

Divya v. Union of India

09 Oct 2023 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of CSE-2022 Rules requiring possession of the EWS Income and Asset Certificate by the application deadline, dismissing petitions challenging denial of EWS reservation for late certificate submission.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Economically Weaker Section Income and Asset Certificate Civil Services Examination Rules 2022 Eligibility criteria

State of Gujarat v. Dilipsinh Kishorsinh Rao

09 Oct 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's order rejecting discharge in a corruption case, holding that the High Court erred in reappreciating defense evidence at the discharge stage and emphasizing the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant discharge application prevention of corruption disproportionate assets sanctioning authority

Rajesh Jain v. Ajay Singh

09 Oct 2023 · Aravind Kumar; S.V.N. Bhatti
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that once the signature on a cheque is admitted, the accused must rebut the presumption under Section 139 NI Act on a preponderance of probabilities, failing which conviction under Section 138 is warranted, and set aside the acquittal of the respondent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 NI Act presumption Burden of proof Dishonour of cheque

Nabha Power Limited v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

09 Oct 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sudhanshu Dhulia; Aravind Kumar · 2018 11 SCC 508
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that once a dispute is conclusively adjudicated, parties cannot reopen settled issues under the guise of fresh disputes, and allowed the appeal setting aside the Regulatory Commission’s order that permitted such re-litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Power Purchase Agreement Gross Calorific Value Coal washing cost

Naresh @ Nehru v. State of Haryana

09 Oct 2023 · Aravind Kumar; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2023 INSC 889

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants for lack of proof of common object and unreliable eyewitness and electronic evidence, emphasizing strict standards for conviction under Section 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC common object unlawful assembly eyewitness testimony

Kishan Chand Jain v. Union of India & Ors

09 Oct 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Mishra · 2023 INSC 915
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed all State Information Commissions to provide hybrid (physical and virtual) hearings and e-filing facilities to ensure effective access to information and justice under the RTI Act, recognizing these as constitutional obligations.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 State Information Commissions virtual hearings hybrid mode

Sheo Raj Singh v. Union of India

09 Oct 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s discretionary order condoning a 479-day delay by the Union of India in filing a land acquisition appeal, emphasizing a liberal, pragmatic approach to 'sufficient cause' in government litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause land acquisition

M/S Harsh Automobiles Private Limited v. Indore Municipal Corporation

09 Oct 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court held that mere display of trade name and business information on own premises does not constitute advertisement liable to advertisement tax and directed fresh adjudication of the tax demand.

civil appeal_allowed Significant advertisement tax municipal corporation trade name display sign boards

Saumya Chaurasia v. Directorate of Enforcement

09 Oct 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 1073

The Supreme Court dismissed the bail appeal of a woman accused under the PMLA, holding that bail under Section 45 is discretionary and that misrepresentation of facts before the court warrants dismissal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail scheduled offence

RANJAN KUMAR CHADHA v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

06 Oct 2023 · J.B. Pardiwala; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 NDPS Act, holding that Section 50 applies only to personal searches and was not attracted as only the accused's bag was searched.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Search of person Search of bag Consent to search

Sarvesh Mathur v. The Registrar General High Court of Punjab and Haryana

06 Oct 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023INSC891

The Supreme Court mandated uniform access to video conferencing and hybrid hearings across all High Courts and tribunals, directing necessary infrastructural upgrades and removal of arbitrary restrictions to ensure effective access to justice.

administrative other Significant video conferencing hybrid hearings access to justice High Courts

Dhani Ram through LRs. & others v. Shiv Singh

06 Oct 2023 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2023INSC876

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision invalidating a Will due to failure to prove its valid execution and attestation, thereby confirming intestate succession rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will execution attesting witnesses Indian Succession Act 1925 Indian Evidence Act 1872

Vishal Chelani & Ors. v. Debashis Nanda

06 Oct 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 913

The Supreme Court held that home buyers holding RERA decrees are financial creditors under the IBC and must be treated equally in insolvency resolution plans, disallowing discriminatory classification.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant financial creditor home buyers RERA Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

K.M. Krishna Reddy v. Vinod Reddy

06 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court held that a suit for injunction based on possession and title is maintainable without a declaration of title when adverse possession is pleaded, and remanded the case for merits after setting aside the High Court's limitation-based dismissal of the amendment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant perpetual injunction adverse possession declaration of title amendment of plaint

Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. v. Kumaon Entertainment and Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd.

05 Oct 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023INSC871

The Supreme Court held that the final land price fixed by the appellant's Board resolution is binding on the respondent, allowed the appeal, and dismissed the writ petition directing payment of the enhanced amount before sale deed execution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease cum sale agreement land allotment change of land use prevailing rate

Dharma @ Dharam Singh v. State of Haryana

05 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 905
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to lack of in-court identification by eyewitnesses, emphasizing the necessity of such identification to uphold conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder Section 302 IPC identification of accused eyewitness testimony

Shanta Rani v. Nasib Kaur

05 Oct 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2023INSC874

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction of a tenant by an NRI landlady under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, affirming the maintainability of summary eviction petitions by NRIs not physically present in India.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Eviction Non-Resident Indian Section 13-B East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

Mukesh Kumar v. S. Kuldeep Singh

05 Oct 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2023INSC873
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction of a tenant under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act by a Non-Resident Indian owner, affirming that the tenant failed to disclose sufficient grounds to obtain leave to defend the summary eviction petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 13-B East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act Non-Resident Indian summary eviction