Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Ramesh Chand v. Management of Delhi Transport Corporation

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that an employee must prove unemployment after termination to claim back wages upon reinstatement and awarded partial back wages where such proof was partially established.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages reinstatement burden of proof unemployment

Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, rejecting exemption claims and upholding the retrospective validity of the Commissioner's clarification circular.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant maize starch Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 Exemption Entry No. 8 Taxation Entry No. 61

Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and not exempt as a millet product, affirming the validity of retrospective tax clarifications issued by the Commissioner.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant maize starch Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act exemption taxation entry

DHEERAJ SINGH v. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

04 Jul 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; BELA M. TRIVEDI · 2023 INSC 594

The Supreme Court held that failure of the High Court to consider cross objections in an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act vitiates the judgment and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation cross objections Order 41 Rule 22 CPC

Dheeraj Singh v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

04 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in not considering cross objections filed by appellants in a land acquisition compensation appeal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation cross objections Order 41 Rule 22 CPC

Reserve Bank of India v. Nair

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; D. P. Karth · 2023 INSC 613

The Supreme Court held that reservation benefits in pension schemes apply prospectively from the statutory cut-off dates and cannot be extended retrospectively to prior service periods.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reservation benefits Employees' Pension Scheme service period statutory cut-off date

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. A. K. NAIR

04 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DIPANKAR DATTA · 2023 INSC 613
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of persons with disabilities to reservation in promotions under the PwD Act, directing RBI to grant promotion benefits to A.K. Nair, while clarifying the constitutional and legislative framework governing such reservations.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant reservation in promotions persons with disabilities Article 16(4-A) PwD Act 1995

Reserve Bank of India v. A. K. Nair

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld statutory reservation in promotion for disabled persons under the PWD Act and directed RBI to grant promotion with reservation benefits to A.K. Nair, affirming the validity of such reservation distinct from SC/ST constitutional provisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation in promotion persons with disabilities Article 16(4-A) PWD Act 1995

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. A. K. NAIR

04 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; DIPANKAR DATTA · 2023 INSC 613
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation benefits in promotions under the PwD Act, 1995 and 2016, directing RBI to grant promotion and benefits to Mr. Nair accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation in promotion persons with disabilities PwD Act 1995 PwD Act 2016

Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayaram Ganpati Jagtap

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 592

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that without establishing employer-employee relationship and excusing the inordinate delay, compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be granted.

labor appeal_dismissed Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 employer-employee relationship delay in filing claim

Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayram Ganpati Jagtap

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for compensation under the Employees Compensation Act due to failure to prove employer-employee relationship and inordinate delay in filing the claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Employees Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship condonation of delay Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Shantabai Ananda Jagatap v. Jayaram Ganpati Jagatap

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act was rightly rejected due to inordinate delay and failure to establish employer-employee relationship.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 employer-employee relationship compensation claim

Shantabai Ananda Jagtap v. Jayram Ganpati Jagtap

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking compensation under the Employees Compensation Act due to failure to prove employer-employee relationship and inordinate delay in filing the claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 employer-employee relationship condonation of delay

Central Excise Commissioner v. M/s Reliance Industries Limited

04 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Bela M. Trivedi

The court upheld that extended limitation for excise duty demands applies only in cases of fraud or suppression, and a bona fide belief based on precedent negates such extension.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act 1944 Section 11C(1) limitation period differential excise duty

Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs and Another v. M/s Reliance Industries Ltd.

04 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that demands for differential excise duty raised beyond the normal limitation period are time barred in absence of fraud or suppression, affirming that a bona fide belief based on binding precedent precludes invocation of extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 11A limitation extended period of limitation suppression of facts

Om Prakash Ahuja v. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 598
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot refuse renewal or deny claims for a validly renewed health insurance policy on grounds of unrelated non-disclosure, directing reimbursement of medical expenses and restoration of renewal orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant health insurance policy renewal of policy non-disclosure repudiation of claim

Om Prakash Ahuja v. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot deny renewal and claims for a renewed health insurance policy period when premiums were paid and non-disclosure of unrelated disease was immaterial, restoring consumer forum orders in favor of the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant health insurance policy policy renewal non-disclosure reimbursement of medical expenses

Sarnam Singh v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 597

The Supreme Court restored the full compensation awarded for 100% loss of earning capacity due to amputation, rejecting the High Court's reduction to 80%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of earning capacity permanent disability functional disability

Sarnam Singh v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

04 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court restored full compensation for a motor accident victim by holding that loss of earning capacity must reflect the functional disability relative to the injured person's occupation, affirming 100% loss where the injury precludes performing the job.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of earning capacity permanent disability functional disability compensation assessment

Ramesh Kumar v. NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhatt; Pankaj Mittal

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's revocation of anticipatory bail and excessive bond condition in a cheating case, emphasizing the discretionary nature of bail and the need for reasonable conditions aligned with the evidence and nature of the offense.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC cheating Section 420 IPC