Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. v. AIRPORTS ECONOMIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY

04 Dec 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh · 2023 INSC 1046

The Supreme Court remanded to the TDSAT the limited issue of whether a newly surfaced MoCA letter affects the calculation of the Hypothetical Regulatory Asset Base using the 'single till' mechanism under the State Support Agreement.

administrative remanded Significant Hypothetical Regulatory Asset Base State Support Agreement single till mechanism Airport Economic Regulatory Authority

Ram Naresh v. State of U.P.

01 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1037

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention can be inferred from joint participation in the crime even without prior conspiracy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention joint liability murder

Shashikant Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh

01 Dec 2023 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2023 INSC 1036

The Supreme Court quashed the charge under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for lack of prima facie evidence that the accused knowingly committed a serious IPC offence against a Scheduled Caste member, while upholding other charges and continuing the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v) charge framing prima facie case

THE KOUSHIK MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY v. AMEENA BEGUM

01 Dec 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 1065
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order dismissing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside an ex-parte decree, and the correct remedy is an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Civil Revision Petition Section 115 CPC

Mohit Singhal & Anr. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.

01 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1035
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that mere demand for loan repayment with abusive language and assault, without proximate instigation, does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC and quashed the prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Instigation Mens rea

Vansh S/O Prakash Dolas v. The Ministry of Education & The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ors.

01 Dec 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Rajesh Bindal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 235
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that children of Government of India employees domiciled in Maharashtra are entitled to State quota medical admission irrespective of parent's posting location and granted restitutive relief for illegal cancellation of admission.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant State quota admission NEET UG-2023 Children of Government employees Domicile criteria

Eldeco Housing and Industries Limited v. Ashok Vidyarthi and Others

30 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1043
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a suit for specific performance filed after resolution of pending litigation is maintainable and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC based on documents not annexed to the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order II Rule 2 CPC specific performance rejection of plaint

BANI AMRIT KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA

30 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1040

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a sale deed executed by a guardian on behalf of a minor, dismissing the challenge due to lack of proof of minor's right and welfare violation, and affirmed limitation principles and bona fide purchaser protection.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Section 8 sale deed minor's property

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER v. ATM CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.

30 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1042
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit for damages for use and occupation of property is maintainable even if such damages were not claimed in an earlier suit for possession, dismissing the appeal against rejection of plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Order II Rule 2 CPC damages for use and occupation suit for possession

Mahalakshmi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

30 Nov 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2023 INSC 1050

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants under Section 498A IPC due to vague allegations and lack of material evidence, allowing the appeal and clarifying trial court's power to proceed if new evidence arises.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of charge sheet cruelty

Chandrasekhar Patel v. Suresh & Ors.

30 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1083

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case, emphasizing the accused's right to cross-examination and that acquittal should not be disturbed if it is a possible view based on the evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Acquittal Cross-examination Eyewitness testimony

ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR & ANOTHER v. URMILA G. & OTHERS

30 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1044

The Supreme Court held that the Upa Lokayukta lacks jurisdiction to issue positive directions for correction of revenue records, which must be pursued through statutory remedies, and set aside the impugned orders accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Lokayukta jurisdiction Upa Lokayukta revenue record correction Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961

Sebastian Dominic v. K. Harris & Others

30 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1041

The Supreme Court upheld the promotion granted to an employee based on a questioned distance education degree, leaving the validity issue open due to his retirement and settled service benefits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant promotion distance education degree M.Phil degree University Grants Commission

Dr. P.N. Shukla v. Union of India

30 Nov 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that granting higher pay scale and NPA to a single employee governed by the same recruitment rules as others without proper amendment was illegal and ordered recovery of excess payments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant higher pay scale Non-Practicing Allowance Research Assistant Assistant Scientific Officer

Hari Babu Thota v. Respondent

29 Nov 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 1056

The Supreme Court held that MSME status for exemption under Section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is to be determined as on the date of submission of the resolution plan, not CIRP commencement, setting aside lower tribunals' orders and allowing the appeal.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 29A Section 240A Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

Vijay v. Union of India

29 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1030

The Supreme Court held that Section 35 of the Stamp Act does not bar secondary evidence of an agreement to sell executed before stamp duty liability arose, allowing its admissibility under the Evidence Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 35 Stamp Act Secondary evidence Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Pop Singh & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh

29 Nov 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2023 INSC 1038

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from Section 304 Part-I to Part-II IPC, holding that the appellants lacked intention to cause death but had knowledge of likely death, and reduced the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC culpable homicide intention to cause death knowledge of likely death

Union of India & Ors. v. K. Suri Babu

29 Nov 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 1033
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that disciplinary proceedings against workmen must be governed by certified Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, and not by the Central Civil Services Rules, 1965, absent a specific notification excluding the Act's applicability.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 Standing Orders Disciplinary proceedings

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India

29 Nov 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 1049

The Supreme Court held that the Union Government lawfully has unilateral power to appoint and extend the tenure of the Chief Secretary of Delhi, given the exclusion of certain subjects from GNCTD's legislative and executive domain.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Chief Secretary appointment GNCTD legislative competence Union Government power Article 239AA

Pavana Dibbur v. The Directorate of Enforcement

29 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1029

The Supreme Court held that prosecution under Section 3 of the PMLA can proceed against a person not named in the predicate offence, but conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC to commit a non-scheduled offence does not attract PMLA provisions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 3 PMLA money laundering scheduled offence