Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Kanimozhi Karunanidhi v. A. Santhana Kumar & Ors.

19 Nov 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that an election petition lacking a concise statement of material facts constituting a cause of action under Section 83(1)(a) of the RP Act is liable to be dismissed at the threshold, and set aside the High Court order dismissing the appellant's applications to reject such a petition.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Election Petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 Material Facts Section 83(1)(a)

M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board & Anr.

10 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 999

The Supreme Court upheld prosecution approval linked to ex-post facto Consent to Establish and restricted the tribunal from deciding issues beyond the appeal's scope.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant ex-post facto Consent to Establish environmental clearance expiry prosecution under Air Act prosecution under Water Act

State of U.P. & Anr. v. Baleshwar Singh & Ors.

09 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1031
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing Uttar Pradesh to pay salary arrears and retiral benefits to an employee unlawfully denied duty post-state bifurcation, emphasizing strict compliance with judicial orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant State of Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand mutual transfer salary arrears

Thanesar Singh Sodhi v. Union of India; Sujata S. Shetty v. Union of India

09 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 997

The Supreme Court held that revocation of a COFEPOSA detention order outside specified exceptions does not invalidate SAFEMA forfeiture proceedings, dismissing appeals challenging such forfeiture orders.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant SAFEMA COFEPOSA detention order forfeiture of property

Madan v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 Nov 2023 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 990
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of appellant Madan for a politically motivated multiple murder, affirming the reliability of eyewitness testimony despite contradictions and emphasizing the 'rarest of rare' doctrine for capital punishment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rarest of rare death penalty direct evidence interested witnesses

Union of India & Ors. v. D.G.O.F. Employees Association and Anr.

09 Nov 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2023 INSC 995

The Supreme Court upheld pay scale parity for Ordnance Factory Board Headquarters employees with similarly placed Central Secretariat Service employees under the Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations, dismissing the Union of India's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant pay scale parity Sixth Central Pay Commission Ordnance Factory Board Central Secretariat Service

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited

09 Nov 2023 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; JB Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 993
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld that fixed capacity charges under a PPA are payable based on declared capacity using RLNG without prior approval from the distribution licensee, dismissing the appeal challenging CERC and APTEL orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Capacity Charges Declared Capacity RLNG

ANKITA THAKUR & ORS. v. THE H.P. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS.

09 Nov 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 992

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of post-application relaxation of eligibility criteria in Himachal Pradesh JOA recruitment under Rule 18, affirming administrative discretion amid ambiguity and rejecting challenges to the selection process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant relaxation of eligibility recognized institution recruitment rules Himachal Pradesh Takniki Shiksha Board Act

Prabhatbhai Aatabhai Dabhi v. State of Gujarat

08 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1003
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to unreliable extra judicial confession and inconsistent forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for credible proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra judicial confession Section 302 IPC blood group analysis reasonable doubt

Sanjay Babu Lal v. State of Haryana

08 Nov 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 994

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC but reduced the life sentence to the period already served, condoning delay in filing the review petition.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC life imprisonment sentence reduction

Ramakant Singh v. State of Jharkhand

07 Nov 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1002
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate cannot entertain a protest petition to modify his earlier order of taking cognizance, quashing the order taking cognizance against the appellants while maintaining cognizance against the main accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cognizance protest petition Section 190 CrPC modification of order

Mohar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Collector

07 Nov 2023 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 1019

The Supreme Court condoned a 13-year delay in filing land acquisition appeals to grant parity compensation at Rs.150 per sq. yard but denied statutory interest for the delayed period.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement condonation of delay Section 18 Land Acquisition Act

Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

07 Nov 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 986
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Supreme Court acquitted appellant in murder by poisoning case due to failure of prosecution to prove motive, cause of death, and administration of poison beyond reasonable doubt, and held delay in FIR not fatal when satisfactorily explained.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant delay in FIR murder by poisoning dying declaration chemical examination report

LOMBARDI ENGINEERING LIMITED v. UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED

06 Nov 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 976

The Supreme Court held that courts under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act have limited jurisdiction to examine arbitration agreements, upheld refundable pre-deposit clauses, and directed appointment of an arbitrator while leaving detailed disputes to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Pre-deposit clause Article 14

Jyotirmay Ray v. The Field General Manager, Punjab National Bank

06 Nov 2023 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2023 INSC 979

The Supreme Court held that denial of provident fund contribution and gratuity on compulsory retirement without specific findings of loss and opportunity of hearing is unjustified under the Payment of Gratuity Act and Bank Regulations.

labor appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement provident fund contribution gratuity Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Sachidhanandam v. E. Vanaja

06 Nov 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 984

The Supreme Court held that under the Hindu Succession Act, a widow of a pre-deceased son is not entitled to inherit her mother-in-law's share in joint family properties, modifying the High Court's decree accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 intestate succession joint family property partition suit

State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer

06 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 988
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Section 65-B certificate can be produced at any stage before trial conclusion by recalling a witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C., especially when original electronic devices are primary evidence, and allowed the prosecution to produce the certificate despite earlier rejection.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act Section 311 Cr.P.C. primary electronic evidence CFSL report admissibility

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD v. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX UP

06 Nov 2023 · Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 974
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the UP VAT Act, full Input Tax Credit is allowable on inputs used in manufacturing taxable goods even when exempt by-products are produced, overruling the High Court's reliance on Karnataka VAT Act precedents.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit UP VAT Act Section 13(1)(f) taxable goods

M/s MULTICON BUILDERS v. SUMANDEVI

06 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court upheld the preliminary decree in a partition suit, protected co-sharers’ rights, and set aside demolition orders pending final decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit preliminary decree co-sharers transfer of share

Jaffar Ali Nawab Ali Chaudhari and Others v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

06 Nov 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that occupants in longstanding possession must have their claims for rehabilitation or compensation under the Town Planning Scheme considered by the Municipal Corporation, setting aside orders denying such consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant Town Planning Scheme possession rehabilitation compensation