Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Experion Developers Private Limited v. Himanshu Dewan and Sonali Dewan

18 Aug 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi; Ujjal Bhuyan

The Supreme Court remanded a consumer dispute on excess sale area charges for fresh consideration, clarifying limitation, estoppel, and non-binding nature of prior non-speaking dismissal orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Limitation Cause of Action Doctrine of Merger

HARENDRA RAI v. STATE OF BIHAR

18 Aug 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that witness testimony obtained under duress is inadmissible, directed transfer of trial and appointment of a special prosecutor, and set aside the acquittal due to subversion of the trial process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant witness intimidation voluntariness of testimony trial fairness Section 311 CrPC

Shiramabai Pundalik Bhave v. The Captain, Record Officer for O.I.C. Records, Sena Corps Abhilekh, Gaya, Bihar State and Another

18 Aug 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2022 SCC OnLine SC 737

The Supreme Court held that long cohabitation after dissolution of a prior marriage creates a presumption of valid marriage entitling the surviving spouse and children to pensionary benefits despite an earlier void marriage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant presumption of marriage Section 114 Evidence Act void marriage Hindu Marriage Act Section 11

Industrial Development Bank of India v. Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs and Others

18 Aug 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that secured creditors' debts under Section 529A of the Companies Act have overriding priority over customs dues in winding up, and customs authorities do not have a statutory first charge to sell imported goods ahead of secured creditors.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 529A Section 530 Customs Act 1962

HIND FILTERS LTD. & ANR. v. HIND FILTER EMPLOYEES’ UNION & ANR.

17 Aug 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Labour Court to re-examine jurisdiction based on the number of workmen employed, permitting fresh evidence to be led on this crucial factual issue.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court jurisdiction Industrial Tribunal Section 10 ID Act

Kishan Chand Jain v. Union of India

17 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J.B.... · 2023INSC741

The Supreme Court directed Information Commissions to rigorously monitor and enforce public authorities' mandatory proactive disclosure obligations under Section 4 of the RTI Act to uphold transparency and accountability.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 4 RTI Act proactive disclosure public authorities

Ramathal & Ors. v. K. Rajamani

17 Aug 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023INSC737
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the doctrine of non est factum to invalidate a fraudulently altered Power of Attorney and consequent sale deeds, restoring the plaintiffs' ownership rights over disputed land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney non est factum fraudulent misrepresentation sale deed

Chimanlal Hargovindas v. Revenue Officer, Pune

17 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation for land acquisition, affirming the application of a one-third deduction for development costs as a correct judicial exercise under the Punjab Land Acquisition Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition market value development cost deduction Punjab Land Acquisition Act 1894

Mala v. State of Punjab

17 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; Dipankar Datta · 2023INSC735
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhancement of compensation for land acquisition with a one-third deduction for development charges, dismissing the State's appeal under Article 136.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition market value development charges Land Acquisition Act 1894

Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking

17 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; J.B....
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting tax reimbursement claims, holding that limited judicial review under the Arbitration Act does not permit reinterpreting contracts if the arbitral view is reasonable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 contractual interpretation

Y.P. Lele v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

16 Aug 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that the explanation to Order XVII Rule 2 CPC does not apply to defendants who have not led evidence, allowing the setting aside of an ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and restoring the suit for adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Order XVII Rule 2 CPC withdrawal of Vakalatnama

H. Vasanthi v. A. Santha

16 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; S.V.N. Bhatti

The Supreme Court held that an unmarried daughter's coparcenary status under Section 29A does not entitle her to partition of property effectively severed from the joint family estate by prior valid partition and sale.

property appeal_dismissed Significant coparcenary Hindu Succession Act Section 29A partition

Pesala Nookaraju v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

16 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023INSC734
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court clarified that the three-month limit in Section 3(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act applies to delegation of power to issue detention orders, not the detention period itself, and upheld the validity of a 12-month preventive detention order following due procedure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant preventive detention Section 3(2) Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act bootlegger public order

DHARMIN BAI KASHYAP v. BABLI SAHU

16 Aug 2023 · Bela M. Trivedi; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2023 INSC 712

The Supreme Court held that an election petition seeking only recounting of votes without claiming reliefs under Rule 6 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats Rules, 1995 is not maintainable and dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's order setting aside the recounting.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Election Petition Recounting of votes Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 Rule 6 of Rules of 1995

Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences & Anr. v. Bikartan Das & Ors.

16 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court held that the enhanced retirement age of 65 years for AYUSH doctors under the Ministry of AYUSH does not automatically apply to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS whose retirement age is governed by their Bye-Laws.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age of superannuation autonomous body Fundamental Rules 56(bb) Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences

State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police v. S. Subbegowda

16 Aug 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 669

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot discharge an accused under Section 482 CrPC after charges are framed and trial has progressed, without finding failure of justice due to sanction irregularity under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19(3) and (4) failure of justice

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai v. 3I Infotech Ltd.

14 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 711

The Supreme Court held that service tax demands must be based on correct classification of taxable services, dismissed Revenue's appeal on erroneous classification, and upheld CESTAT's findings subject to reconsideration of SEZ exemption claims.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax Finance Act, 1994 Intellectual Property Service Information Technology Software

Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

11 Aug 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 705
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Sections 411 and 120-B IPC due to unreliable disclosure statements, hostile seizure witnesses, improper trial procedure, and absence of conspiracy agreement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 411 IPC Section 120-B IPC disclosure statement Section 27 Evidence Act

M/S LARSEN AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGRATION COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA

11 Aug 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 708

The Supreme Court held that courts lack jurisdiction to reduce the statutory 18% interest awarded by an arbitral tribunal under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and reinstated the original interest rate in the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(b) Interest rate on arbitral award Judicial interference in arbitration

Union of India v. K. Pushpavanam

11 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 701

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot compel the legislature or executive to enact laws or confer statutory status on bodies, limiting judicial mandamus to recommendations and advisory directions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ of mandamus legislative mandate Law Commission of India Liability in Tort