Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

R. Sreenivasa v. State of Karnataka

06 Sep 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that the last seen theory was not proved beyond reasonable doubt and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen theory Section 106 Evidence Act burden of proof circumstantial evidence

Lal Bahadur Shastri Educational Society v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court held that voluntary deposit of disputed additional FAR charges without adjudication of illegality does not entitle appellants to interest on refund during litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant additional FAR charges interest on refund voluntary deposit Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit

Makkella Nagaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition verifying the petitioner’s juvenility at the time of offence and ordered his immediate release after he had undergone imprisonment exceeding the maximum statutory period under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.

criminal petition_allowed Significant juvenility juvenile justice juvenile in conflict with law juvenile justice act 2000

Prakash Bang v. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court dismissed the consumer complaint alleging vaccine-induced myositis due to insufficient evidence establishing causation and held that minimal unproven adverse reactions do not constitute deficiency in service.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection vaccine injury myositis deficiency in service

The State of Punjab and Others v. Jaswant Singh

05 Sep 2023 · J. K. Maheshwari; K. V. Viswanathan
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that discharge of a probationer constable under Rule 12.21 of Punjab Police Rules is a simpliciter termination not requiring inquiry or hearing, and upheld the validity of the discharge order dismissing the reinstatement claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probationer discharge Punjab Police Rules 1934 Rule 12.21 PPR simpliciter termination

PACL v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Sep 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023INSC795

The Supreme Court dismissed omnibus bail applications in multiple criminal cases related to PACL fraud, directing accused to seek bail before respective jurisdictional courts while extending interim bail for three months.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail omnibus bail jurisdictional courts interim bail

Harilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Sep 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts, delayed FIR, and inconclusive forensic evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder FIR delay eyewitness testimony

Union of India & Others v. Jogeshwar Swain

05 Sep 2023 · Manoj Misra; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of a BSF constable's dismissal due to procedural irregularities and insufficient evidence despite his plea of guilty before a Summary Security Force Court.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Summary Security Force Court Border Security Force Act, 1968 plea of guilty procedural safeguards

Purushottam Bagh Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. v. Shobhan Pal Singh

04 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 789
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision setting aside an arbitral award nullifying a sale deed, holding that the society failed to prove violation of bye-laws by the member.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 sale deed allotment of plot bye-laws violation

Jamboo Bhandari v. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.

04 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023INSC822
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that while Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act mandates a minimum 20% deposit for suspension of sentence in cheque dishonour appeals, exceptions can be made in exceptional cases with reasons recorded, restoring the revision petitions for reconsideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 148 Section 389 CrPC

Ameena Begum v. State of Telangana

04 Sep 2023 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court quashed a preventive detention order against a habitual offender, holding that the offences did not disturb public order and that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind properly, thereby violating constitutional safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order subjective satisfaction

Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar

04 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and death sentence of the appellant in a rape-murder case due to procedural lapses including failure to conduct medical examination and obtain forensic reports, and inadequate Section 313 CrPC examination.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant circumstantial evidence rape and murder medical examination Section 53A CrPC

FULMATI DHRAMDEV YADAV v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

04 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act are limited to substantial questions of law and restored the Commissioner's compensation award, finding no perversity in the fact findings regarding the deceased's employment and death during course of employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen Compensation Act Section 30 substantial question of law employer-employee relationship

Rajendra Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh

04 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to promote eligible Group 'D' employees to Group 'C' posts under the prescribed quota after finding procedural lapses and vacancy non-filling, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 142.

administrative appeal_allowed Procedural promotion Group C posts Group D employees quota

Pramod Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P.

04 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 SCCOnline SC 791

The Supreme Court reduced the sentence of the appellant convicted under Section 307 IPC from 5 to 3 years imprisonment, emphasizing the need to balance aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC sentencing aggravating and mitigating factors judicial discretion

L.R. Patil v. Gulbarga University

04 Sep 2023 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court held that a government servant's lien on a previous post continues during probation on a new post unless substantively absorbed, and relieving to join another post with permission does not amount to resignation under Karnataka Civil Service Rules.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lien Karnataka Civil Service Rules Rule 252(b) Rule 20 Note 4

Derha v. Vishal

01 Sep 2023 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision reducing the appellant's share in Mitakshara coparcenary property to one-sixth, applying Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the principle of notional partition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Mitakshara coparcenary property Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 Section 8

Pallavi v. Union of India

01 Sep 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court held that the 2021 notification restricting OCI cardholders' eligibility for medical seats applies prospectively only, protecting rights of OCI cardholders issued cards before that date and allowing the petitioner to participate in NEET PG counselling as an OCI candidate.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant OCI cardholder NEET PG admission Ministry of Home Affairs notification 04.03.2021 retrospective application

Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun

01 Sep 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that children born of void or voidable Hindu marriages, though conferred legitimacy under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, have property rights limited to their parents' self-acquired property and do not acquire coparcenary rights in ancestral property.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act Section 16 legitimacy of children void and voidable marriage coparcenary property

Harendra Rai v. State of Bihar

01 Sep 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court reversed the acquittal, convicted respondent no.2 under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, imposed life imprisonment with fines, and directed compensation to victims' families considering the delay and State's deficient prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC Section 357 CrPC Section 357-A CrPC