Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Suresh Garodia v. State of Assam

09 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 39
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings initiated after a 34-year delay, holding them to be an abuse of process motivated by a property dispute and emphasizing the need for reasons when rejecting police final reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings delay in lodging FIR abuse of process of law

K.P. Mozika v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

09 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 27
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that contracts for hiring vehicles to ONGC and IOCL did not transfer the right to use goods and thus were not sales liable to VAT or sales tax but contracts for services liable to service tax.

tax appeal_allowed Significant transfer of right to use goods Clause 29A(d) Article 366 Assam VAT Act Sales Tax Act

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. v. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited

08 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 23

The Supreme Court held that under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, tariff adoption requires regulatory scrutiny including market alignment, and only bidders issued Letters of Intent qualify as successful bidders entitled to supply power, setting aside the High Court's order directing procurement from a non-successful bidder.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 63 tariff adoption competitive bidding

ANJUM ARA v. STATE OF BIHAR

08 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 40

The Supreme Court held that disqualification based on a guideline clause already declared unconstitutional is unsustainable and ordered reinstatement of the appellant with continuity in service.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Anganwari Sevika Guidelines 2011 Clause 4.[9] Articles 14 and 16 disqualification

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Haryana

05 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 21
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC extrajudicial confession

Gurdev Singh Bhalla v. State of Punjab & Ors.

05 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 22

The Supreme Court upheld the summoning of police officials under Section 319 Cr.P.C. despite absence of sanction, holding that prima facie evidence justified their trial for corruption-related offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning of accused Prevention of Corruption Act sanction prima facie evidence

Jitendra Kumar Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 20
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a murder case by holding that the dying declaration was unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC

State of Punjab v. Gurpreet Singh

05 Jan 2024 · Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 154
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal of the main accused in a murder case, restoring his conviction based on reliable eyewitness testimony, motive, and recovery of weapon, while upholding acquittal of co-accused due to lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 136 Constitution of India Section 302 IPC Acquittal Eyewitness testimony

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Darshan Lal Bohra

05 Jan 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 508

The Supreme Court held that only objectors who filed written objections under Section 5A have a right to hearing, acceptance of compensation bars challenge, and substantial compliance with Section 5A suffices to uphold land acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 5A hearing Objections to land acquisition Acceptance of compensation

CBI BS AND FC Mumbai v. Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria and Anr.

05 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 618

The Supreme Court set aside the Bombay High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings related to IPO fraud, holding that SEBI consent does not bar criminal trial and remanded the matter for hearing by a Division Bench.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings SEBI consent order High Court Rules jurisdiction Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Sarfaraz Alam v. Union of India

04 Jan 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 18

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a COFEPOSA detention order, holding that documented refusal by the detenue to receive grounds of detention does not vitiate the order if authorities comply with Article 22(5) procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) grounds of detention COFEPOSA Act

Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab

04 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 19

The Supreme Court overturned the murder conviction of Darshan Singh due to failure of prosecution to prove his presence at the crime scene beyond reasonable doubt and accepted the possibility of suicide, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstances in circumstantial evidence cases.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC

All India Judges Association v. Union of India & Ors

04 Jan 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 26
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld and modified the Second National Judicial Pay Commission's recommendations on judicial officers' allowances, affirming their distinct constitutional status and directing institutionalized implementation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial service allowances Second National Judicial Pay Commission House Building Advance

S.V. SAMUDRAM v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR

04 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 17

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot modify arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and restored the original award, emphasizing narrow judicial interference limited to specified grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Modification of arbitral award

DBS Bank Limited Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Limited and Another

03 Jan 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 14

The Supreme Court held that dissenting secured financial creditors under the amended IBC are entitled to monetary payment not less than the liquidation value of their security interest, with the amendment applying to pending proceedings.

corporate other Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 30(2)(b)(ii) dissenting financial creditor liquidation value

Ajeet Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 5
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR for rape and criminal intimidation, holding that the physical relationship was consensual and culminated in marriage, rendering the prosecution an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC Hindu Marriage Act Section 9

Neeraj Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

03 Jan 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 6
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Section 364A IPC for lack of ransom demand evidence, converted them to Section 364 IPC, affirmed other convictions, and directed victim compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom demand of ransom injured eyewitness

MARY PUSHPAM v. TELVI CURUSUMARY

03 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 8
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld the doctrine of merger and judicial discipline, restoring the appellant's title and possession over the entire disputed 8 cents of land as per the earlier binding High Court judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of merger judicial discipline coordinate benches adverse possession

Satish P. Bhatt v. State of Maharashtra

03 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 16
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s cancellation of bail and suspension of sentence due to the appellant’s failure to comply with a court-ordered financial settlement under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act bail cancellation suspension of sentence financial undertaking

Brij Narayan Shukla v. Sudesh Kumar Alias

03 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 9

The Supreme Court held that a suit filed within 12 years of a registered sale deed is not barred by limitation and that prior permissive tenancy does not amount to adverse possession extinguishing title.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession limitation registered sale deed Zamindari abolition