Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Major Gen. Darshan Singh v. Brij Bhushan Chaudhary

01 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 157
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance of sale of HUF property due to plaintiffs' suppression of material facts and held that specific performance is discretionary and cannot be granted against one co-sharer alone.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Hindu Undivided Family property equitable relief readiness and willingness

Mohammed Khalid and Another v. State of Telangana

01 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 158

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in an NDPS case due to procedural lapses in search, seizure, sampling, and unreliable prosecution evidence, emphasizing strict compliance with NDPS Act safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act search and seizure Section 52A NDPS Act chain of custody

M/S ARIF AZIM CO. LTD. v. M/S APTECH LTD.

01 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 155
Cites 0 · Cited by 18

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act applies to Section 11(6) arbitration petitions, limitation begins after valid arbitration notice and failure to appoint arbitrator, and allowed the petition for appointment of arbitrator as filed within limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137 Limitation Act Appointment of arbitrator

High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors.

29 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 150
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that interim stay orders cannot be automatically vacated after six months without judicial hearing, reaffirming the independent jurisdiction of High Courts and limiting the scope of Article 142 powers to prevent judicial legislation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant interim order automatic vacation Article 142 Article 226

Basavaraj v. Indira and Others

29 Feb 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 151

The Supreme Court held that a belated amendment seeking to challenge a compromise decree at the trial's fag end is impermissible without due diligence and must be challenged only before the court which passed the decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint compromise decree Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC

Savitri Bai v. Savitri Bai

29 Feb 2024 · Sanjay Karol; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 152

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a duly proved Will over a subsequent sale deed executed without the legatee's consent, restoring ownership and possession to the Will's beneficiary.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will validity Indian Succession Act Section 63 Evidence Act Section 68 Sale deed

Vedanta Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors

29 Feb 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 175

The Supreme Court dismissed Vedanta Limited's appeal, affirming the High Court's closure order of its copper smelter unit for repeated environmental violations, emphasizing the primacy of environmental protection over economic interests.

environmental_law appeal_dismissed Significant environmental violations closure of industrial unit Article 226 jurisdiction Article 136 discretionary power

Nirmal Premkumar & Anr. v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

29 Feb 2024 · Dipankar Datta; K. V. Viswanathan; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 193
Cites 1 · Cited by 22

The Supreme Court acquitted two teachers accused of sexual harassment under the POCSO Act due to material contradictions and lack of reliable corroboration in the victim's testimony, emphasizing strict scrutiny of evidence in sexual offence cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual harassment victim testimony contradictions in evidence

Bharti Cellular Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 57, Kolkata

28 Feb 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that cellular service providers are not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194-H on payments to franchisees/distributors who are independent contractors, not agents.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 194-H Income Tax Act Tax Deduction at Source Principal-Agent Relationship Franchise Agreement

Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited v. Wind Four Renergy Private Limited

27 Feb 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 160

The Supreme Court held that delay extensions for commissioning renewable energy projects must commence from actual transmission readiness, set aside the appellate tribunal's order granting extension from its judgment date, and allowed SECI to recover refunded amounts with interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Long Term Access commissioning delay renewable energy

Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited v. Wind Four Renergy Private Limited

27 Feb 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 795

The Supreme Court held that delay extensions for commissioning renewable energy projects must be computed from the actual operationalisation of transmission access, not appellate orders, restoring the regulatory commission's order and allowing recovery of refunded amounts with interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Long Term Access commissioning delay renewable energy

Cdr Seema Chaudhary v. Union of India and Others

26 Feb 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli · 2024 INSC 147
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court directed a fresh, stand-alone consideration of the petitioner’s Permanent Commission application in strict adherence to its prior binding judgment, rejecting the tribunal’s grouping with later batches and allowing a one-time proportional vacancy increase.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Permanent Commission Short Service Commission Indian Navy Lieutenant Commander Annie Nagaraja

Brahmaputra Concrete Pipe Industries v. Assam State Electricity Board

26 Feb 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 145
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Registrar cannot refuse registration of curative petitions solely because the review petition was dismissed in open court, emphasizing that maintainability must be judicially determined by a Bench, not administratively by the Registry.

civil appeal_allowed Significant curative petition Supreme Court Rules 2013 Order XLVIII Order XV Rule 5

Shiv Jatia v. Gian Chand Malick & Ors.

23 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 142
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court quashed the criminal complaint against appellants for lack of prima facie offence and improper issuance of summons without requisite police report under Section 202 CrPC in a pre-2006 complaint.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 202 CrPC summoning order quashing of complaint authorization to sign agreement

Swami Goverdhan Rangachariji v. M/S. A.J. Printers

23 Feb 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 141

The Supreme Court disposed of a landlord-tenant dispute by recording an amicable settlement granting the tenant time to vacate the premises under terms of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995.

civil petition_allowed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995 ejectment tenant rights landlord rights

K. BALASUBRAMANI v. THE TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT

23 Feb 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 140

The Supreme Court affirmed ejectment of tenants occupying temple shops beyond lease terms under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, while permitting limited occupation extensions subject to arrears payment and agreed conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Section 78 encroachment ejectment

Venkataraman Krishnamurthy v. Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd.

22 Feb 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 132

The Supreme Court upheld the purchaser's contractual right to terminate a sale agreement and claim refund with interest due to delay in possession beyond the grace period, setting aside the consumer forum's order that denied unconditional refund.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell possession for fit outs grace period termination of contract

Naresh Kumar v. State of Haryana

22 Feb 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra; Varsha Mendiratta; Pooja Sharm... · 2024 INSC 149
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, holding that mere demand for money and suicide within seven years of marriage do not suffice to raise a presumption of abetment without evidence of cruelty or proximate incitement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Section 113A Evidence Act Mens rea

M/S. DOMCO SMOKELESS FUELS PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

22 Feb 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 133

The Supreme Court directed refund of excess amounts paid over notified coal prices with 12% interest, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of contempt proceedings for non-compliance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant refund of excess price e-auction notified price interest on refund

Lucknow Nagar Nigam v. Kohli Brothers Colour Lab. Pvt. Ltd.

22 Feb 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 135

The Supreme Court held that enemy property vested in the Custodian is property of the Union and exempt from state property tax under Article 285 of the Constitution, dismissing the municipal corporation's appeal.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Enemy Property Act, 1968 Article 285 Constitution of India property tax exemption Custodian of Enemy Property