Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

AMBALAL PARIHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

16 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 946
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that filing a civil writ petition to club multiple FIRs circumventing the criminal roster is a gross abuse of process and dismissed the petition with costs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abuse of process forum shopping roster system Section 482 CrPC

MOHAMED IBRAHIM v. THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS.

16 Oct 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2023 INSC 914

The Supreme Court held that TANGEDCO's rejection of a colour vision deficient candidate without prescribed norms and failure to provide reasonable accommodation was arbitrary and directed his appointment with suitable accommodation.

employment appeal_allowed Significant colour blindness defective colour vision reasonable accommodation Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Mathews J. Nedumpara & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 918
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Senior Advocate designation under the Advocates Act, rejecting claims of arbitrariness and discrimination.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Senior Advocate designation Advocates Act 1961 Article 14 equality Article 19 profession

d6b79f0fcaa46eed8ae4009da390728b27b718333ce07895475bda9873dc8d25

15 Oct 2023

The court upheld compensation fixed under the Land Acquisition Act based on government floor rates and market value, dismissing claims for enhanced compensation due to lack of procedural irregularity.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 compensation fixation floor rates market value

Delma Lubna Coelho v. Edmond Clint Fernandes

13 Oct 2023 · Rajesh Bindal; Aravind Kumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the wife's petition to transfer matrimonial proceedings from Karnataka to Maharashtra, holding that no sufficient grounds existed for transfer and declined to dissolve the marriage under Article 142 at this stage.

family petition_dismissed Significant transfer petition matrimonial proceedings jurisdiction Article 142

Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

13 Oct 2023 · M. M. Sundresh; J. B. Pardiwala; Indu Marwah; Dipti Khurana · 2023 INSC 907
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal in a murder case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the sole eyewitness testimony was unreliable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate court sole eyewitness circumstantial evidence

Pankaj Kumar Tiwari v. Indian Overseas Bank Asset Recovery Management Branch

13 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 937

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's writ petition stay, held that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking Article 226, and stayed the Civil Court's order appointing a Receiver over mortgaged properties pending proper adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 14 Court Receiver Article 226

Yusuf @ Asif v. State

13 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 912
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the NDPS conviction due to non-compliance with mandatory procedures under Section 52A requiring Magistrate's presence and certification during seizure and sampling.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure procedure sample drawing

Mohd. Rijwan v. State of Haryana

13 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 911

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting the importance of proper identification procedures and complete circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together test identification parade identification of accused

State of U.P. v. Ehsan

13 Oct 2023 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 906
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disputed factual questions of possession under the Urban Land Ceiling Act should not be decided in writ jurisdiction and remanded the petitioner to file a suit, setting aside the High Court's order granting relief under the Repeal Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act possession writ jurisdiction repeal act

Jammu Development Authority v. S. Paramjeet Singh

13 Oct 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2023 INSC 922

The Supreme Court upheld cancellation of allotment due to non-payment of balance premium, set aside the High Court order, and directed re-auction with appropriate refunds and interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant allotment cancellation public auction balance payment default earnest money forfeiture

Pradyuman Bisht v. Union of India

12 Oct 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 706

The Supreme Court mandated comprehensive security and digitization measures in court complexes to safeguard judicial stakeholders and ensure effective administration of justice.

criminal other Significant court security CCTV installation judicial safety court premises

Mathosri Manikbai Kothari College of Visual Arts v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner

12 Oct 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 909

The Supreme Court upheld the clubbing of two educational institutions run by the same Society for EPF Act coverage based on functional and financial integration, dismissing the appellant’s challenge.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 EPF Act coverage clubbing of establishments functional integrity

UCO BANK AND OTHERS v. M.B. MOTWANI

12 Oct 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 908
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Disciplinary proceedings against a bank employee post-retirement are valid only if a chargesheet was issued before superannuation; dismissal imposed after retirement without such initiation is invalid.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings chargesheet superannuation Regulation 20 of 1979 Regulations

Nutan Kumari v. B.R.A. Bihar University

12 Oct 2023 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 966

The Supreme Court quashed the flawed selection process for PTI appointments that violated advertisement terms and principles of fairness, restoring the Single Judge's order and directing a fresh selection in accordance with law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant selection process advertisement conditions arbitrariness natural justice

Kamalakar v. State of Karnataka

12 Oct 2023 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 989

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for cruelty under Section 498A IPC but set aside the conviction for abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC due to lack of proximate instigation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC Cruelty Abetment to suicide

State of Rajasthan v. Gautam

11 Oct 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 903

The Supreme Court enhanced the sentence for a grievous sexual offence against a minor from twelve to fourteen years rigorous imprisonment, emphasizing the gravity of the crime over mitigating factors like the accused's age or caste.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sexual assault child victim sentence enhancement Section 376 IPC

Bichitrananda Behera v. State of Orissa and Others

11 Oct 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2023 INSC 902
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal holding his appointment as Physical Education Trainer valid despite competing claims, emphasizing delay and laches bar relief and affirming the validity of actions by a Managing Committee functioning under judicial interim orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Managing Committee Physical Education Trainer appointment validity delay and laches

e9aacd0331abc6592731cd17b9b1f6b77fdd1f637f7c0c35275b86760f2eb938

10 Oct 2023

The High Court clarified the strict conditions and procedural safeguards for imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, setting aside penalties where requirements were not met.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 271 Income Tax Act Penalty for concealment Furnishing inaccurate particulars Procedural safeguards

Siby Thomas v. M/s. Somany Ceramics Ltd

10 Oct 2023 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court quashed the complaint against a retired partner for lack of specific averments under Section 141(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that mere partnership status without clear responsibility for business conduct is insufficient for vicarious liability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Section 482 CrPC