Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 471
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the Union of India to appoint visually impaired candidates against backlog reserved vacancies under the PWD Act, 1995, exercising its constitutional jurisdiction to remedy statutory non-compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 33 PWD Act Section 36 PWD Act reservation

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur -II v. M/s Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 470

The Supreme Court upheld that HDPE bags containing multiple poly packs sold to distributors are wholesale packages not liable to duty under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 4A Standards of Weight & Measures Rules, 1977 group package

Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures Films India Private Limited & Ors

08 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 465

The Supreme Court upheld the film's certification while emphasizing the need to balance free speech with the dignity and rights of persons with disabilities, mandating inclusion of disability experts in film certification bodies.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant freedom of speech and expression disability rights film certification stereotyping

Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 479

The Supreme Court held that bail conditions requiring a certificate from the accused's Embassy and dropping a Google Maps PIN for location tracking are onerous and violate constitutional rights, and thus must be deleted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail conditions NDPS Act certificate of assurance foreign accused

Lal Mohammad Manjur Ansari v. The State of Gujrat

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 475

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to unreliable extra-judicial confession, doubtful dying declaration, hostile eyewitnesses, and investigative lapses creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC extra-judicial confession dying declaration hostile witnesses

Naresh Kumar v. State of Delhi

08 Jul 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 464
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction due to fatal non-compliance of mandatory questioning under Section 313 CrPC causing material prejudice to the accused, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC incriminating circumstances material prejudice common intention

Suresh Dattu Bhojane & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 468

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, holding that mere presence in an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit murder suffices for liability, even without active participation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object murder

P. Sasikumar v. State

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 474
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to unreliable identification evidence arising from the non-conduct of a Test Identification Parade, emphasizing the necessity of TIP when the accused is a stranger to witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC

Surender Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 462
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder of a police guard who fatally shot a relative inside a police station, rejecting claims of self-defense and grave and sudden provocation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder self-defense grave and sudden provocation Section 302 IPC

Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

03 Jul 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 645

The Supreme Court granted bail to an undertrial accused under UAPA due to violation of his right to speedy trial and prolonged pre-trial incarceration exceeding four years.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Supreme Court of India

02 Jul 2024 · Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4930-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging judicial appointment delays and upheld limited judicial review over the collegium's subjective satisfaction in appointments.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant locus standi judicial appointments Article 217 collegium system

JOTHI @ NAGAJOTHI v. THE STATE

27 Jun 2024 · VIPUL M. PANCHOLI · 2025 INSC 1417

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that absence of independent witnesses and procedural lapses in sampling do not vitiate prosecution if the evidence is consistent and sample integrity is maintained.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act seizure independent witnesses sampling

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another v. Sunita

24 Jun 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that accident benefit under a life insurance policy is payable only if the policy is in force on the date of accident, and non-disclosure of accident at revival disentitles the insured from claiming such benefit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant life insurance policy accident benefit policy lapse revival of policy

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Babbu Rathore & Anr.

14 Jun 2024 · Indu Malhotra; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that while investigation under the SC/ST Act must be conducted by an officer not below Deputy Superintendent rank, proceedings for IPC offences cannot be quashed if investigated by a competent officer under the Code, restoring trial for IPC offences.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 investigation Deputy Superintendent of Police Section 9 of Act, 1989

ANISH M RAWTHER @ ANEES MOHAMMED RAWTHER v. HAFEEZ UR RAHMAN & ORS.

14 Jun 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 460
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed as infructuous an appeal challenging an interim order after the suit was finally decreed, holding that the moratorium under IBC does not automatically bar suit proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend deposit condition Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

The Commercial Tax Officer v. Mohan Breweries and Distilleries Limited

13 Jun 2024 · Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that purchase tax under Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu GST Act is leviable on empty bottles purchased from unregistered dealers but the assessee is entitled to benefit of binding departmental clarifications exempting such tax for the assessment year 1996-97, and cash discounts given are not taxable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant purchase tax Section 7-A Tamil Nadu GST Act empty bottles unregistered dealers

SHAHED KAMAL & ORS v. M/s A. SURTI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.

10 Jun 2024 · K. V. Viswanathan; N. Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 502

The Supreme Court held that peaceful protest by homebuyers highlighting genuine grievances in mild language falls within the 9th Exception to defamation and quashed criminal defamation proceedings against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant defamation Section 499 IPC Section 500 IPC 9th Exception to Section 499

Jugal Kishore Khanna v. Sudhir Khanna

06 Jun 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 224

The Supreme Court held that an oral family settlement with payment can transfer joint family property rights absent registered documents, restoring appellants' exclusive ownership of Kamla Nagar property while affirming respondents' exclusive ownership of Malcha Marg property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family settlement joint family property oral settlement immovable property

Palakom Abdul Rahiman v. The Station House Officer

01 Jun 2024 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention among accused suffices for murder liability even without proof of unlawful assembly.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention Section 302 IPC murder

Palakom Abdul Rahiman v. The Station House Officer

01 Jun 2024 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld life convictions of accused for double murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention suffices for joint liability even without common object under Section 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention Section 302 IPC murder