Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

City Montessori School v. State of U.P.

02 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 570

The Supreme Court upheld the illegality of leasehold-to-freehold conversion without market value payment and affirmed that State land transfers must be transparent and non-arbitrary, dismissing appeals challenging auction cancellation and conversion orders.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Nazul property leasehold to freehold conversion auction cancellation State largesse

The State of Gujarat v. M/s. Ambuja Cement Ltd

02 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 572

The Supreme Court upheld that Value Added Tax and unclaimed tax credit purchases are excluded from taxable turnover under the Gujarat VAT Act, emphasizing strict statutory interpretation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Value Added Tax purchase price taxable turnover of purchases tax credit

Sudeep Chatterjee v. State of Bihar

02 Aug 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 567

The Supreme Court held that onerous and impracticable conditions imposed for anticipatory bail in matrimonial offence cases violate personal liberty and must be reasonable and conducive to reconciliation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. onerous bail conditions matrimonial disputes

NATIONAL HOUSING BANK v. BHERUDAN DUGAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD.

01 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 566

The Supreme Court held that specific averments of being in charge and responsible for company business are mandatory under Section 50(1) of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, quashing the complaint against directors lacking such averments but allowing it against the Managing Director and company.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant National Housing Bank Act, 1987 Section 50(1) vicarious liability Managing Director liability

Union of India v. Prohlad Guha

01 Aug 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 563

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of employees appointed on compassionate grounds through forged documents, ruling such appointments void ab initio and not protected under Article 311 of the Constitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment fraudulent appointment Article 311 Constitution of India natural justice

M/S. PRO KNITS v. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CANARA BANK

01 Aug 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 565
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that the MSME revival and rehabilitation framework notified under the MSMED Act and RBI directions are mandatory for banks before classifying MSME loans as NPAs, setting aside the High Court's contrary ruling.

civil appeal_allowed Significant MSMED Act SARFAESI Act MSME restructuring framework Non-Performing Asset

The State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh

01 Aug 2024 · D. Y. Chandrachud; B. R. Gavai; Pankaj Mithal; Satish Chandr... · 2024 INSC 562

The Supreme Court held that sub-classification within Scheduled Castes for reservation is constitutionally permissible under Articles 14, 15, and 16, overruling the earlier Chinnaiah judgment.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark sub-classification Scheduled Castes reservation Articles 14, 15, 16

Yugal Sikri v. State of U.P.

30 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 597

The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act must specifically aver breach of a binding settlement and be filed with proper government authority under Section 34(1), and quashed proceedings where these conditions were not met.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 29 ID Act Section 34 ID Act Section 482 CrPC

Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India

30 Jul 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 558

The Supreme Court held that State Bar Councils cannot charge enrolment fees beyond the statutory amount prescribed under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, and other fees cannot be made mandatory pre-conditions for enrolment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Advocates Act, 1961 enrolment fee State Bar Councils Bar Council of India

YASH DEVELOPERS v. HARIHAR KRUPA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

30 Jul 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2024 INSC 559
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a slum rehabilitation developer's agreement for inordinate delay and lack of bona fide efforts, emphasizing the statutory duty and accountability of authorities under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Section 13(2) Slum Rehabilitation Authority Judicial review

PIC DEPARTMENTALS PVT. LTD. v. SREELEATHERS PVT. LTD.

30 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 654

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretion to allow a delayed Written Statement due to registry confusion, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant extension of time written statement condonation of delay procedural rules

Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

30 Jul 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1107
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that death after nine months due to injuries inflicted by the accused maintains the chain of causation and the High Court erred in reducing the conviction to attempt to murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC causation intention

SBS Biotech & Others v. State of Himachal Pradesh

29 Jul 2024 · Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 171
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld prosecution under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act for record-keeping violations, affirmed the three-year limitation period, and confirmed the Special Judge's jurisdiction to try the offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 18(a)(vi) Section 18-B Section 27(d)

VIDYA AND OTHERS v. M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD.

29 Jul 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 557

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal directing refund of amounts paid for delayed possession of a flat with interest at 12% per annum, rejecting the Developer's force majeure defense.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant real estate delay refund with interest force majeure flat buyer agreement

Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors v. Prakash Kumar Dixit

29 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 575
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against a Single Judge's contempt order that crystallizes substantive rights, restoring the appeal for merits consideration regarding promotion entitlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19 appeal Letters Patent Appeal Promotion entitlement

NEK PAL v. NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

26 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 574
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a second appeal under Section 100 CPC cannot be finally heard without prior framing and notice of substantial questions of law, setting aside the High Court judgment and restoring the appeals for fresh hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second appeal Substantial question of law Framing of issues

UP ROADWAYS RETIRED OFFICIALS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

26 Jul 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court held that former Uttar Pradesh Roadways employees who never held pensionable posts as per relevant Government Orders and regulations are not entitled to pension, dismissing their appeals and clarifying pension rights under statutory provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension entitlement Uttar Pradesh Roadways State Roadways Transport Corporation Government Orders

Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/S Steel Authority of India

25 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; B.V. Nagarathna · 2024 INSC 554

The Supreme Court held that royalty under the MMDR Act is not a tax and that the Act limits State powers to tax mineral rights, clarifying the constitutional division of legislative powers over mineral taxation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant royalty mineral rights taxation Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

Manharan Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

25 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Prashant Kumar Mishra; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 560

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to the prosecution's failure to prove his presence at the relevant time and held that the burden under Section 106 Evidence Act cannot be shifted without cogent evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act last seen together burden of proof

Chairman, National Highways Authority of India v. Arvind Kumar Thakur

24 Jul 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 556

The Supreme Court allowed NHAI's appeal, holding that toll collection on a partially completed highway section under BOT contract is lawful and toll amounts collected need not be refunded.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Highways Authority of India toll collection Build Operate Transfer National Highways Fee Rules 2008