Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Trisha Singh v. Anurag Kumar

15 May 2024 · B. R. Gavai; S. V. N. Bhatti; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 450
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enforced a matrimonial settlement agreement, dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142, and upheld the binding nature of mediated compromises in family disputes.

family petition_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 9 Section 13-B Article 142 Constitution

Shivendra Pratap Singh Thakur @ Banti v. State of Chhattisgarh

15 May 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Satish Chandra Sharma; Sandeep Mehta

The Supreme Court quashed a delayed and unsubstantiated FIR alleging trespass and damage to property, holding that vague allegations and lack of evidence justify quashing under Article 142.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR delay in lodging FIR Section 447 IPC Section 294 IPC

Rajni and Another v. Union of India and Another

15 May 2024 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1201
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that credible prima facie proof of ticket issuance shifts the burden to Railways to disprove bonafide travel under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, allowing compensation despite absence of physical ticket or seizure memo.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 Section 124-A compensation bonafide passenger

The Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar, Kerala v. P.J. Antony

14 May 2024 · A.S. Bopanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 412

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of a confiscation order for sandalwood on private lands, holding that no forest offence was proved and procedural compliance under the Government scheme was required.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Forest Act, 1961 confiscation order forest offence Section 69 presumption

Bar of Indian Lawyers v. D. K. Gandhi PS National Institute

14 May 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 410
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that services rendered by advocates under a contract of personal service are excluded from the Consumer Protection Act, and complaints alleging deficiency in legal services are not maintainable under the Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act Advocates Act Legal Profession Deficiency in Service

Bhikchand S/O Dhondiram Mutha v. Shamabai Dhanraj Gugale

14 May 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 411

The Supreme Court held that under Section 144 CPC, a judgment debtor is entitled to restitution by setting aside an execution sale made to the decree holder when the decree is subsequently varied to his detriment, especially where the executing court failed to sell only necessary property portions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 144 CPC restitution execution sale decree variation

IN RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS

14 May 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 461

The Supreme Court directed States to urgently improve prison conditions and infrastructure to uphold prisoners' fundamental rights under Article 21, emphasizing adherence to the Model Prison Manual 2016 and timely compliance.

constitutional other Significant prison overcrowding inhuman conditions Article 21 fundamental rights of prisoners

Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen & Ors.

13 May 2024 · Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 407

The Supreme Court held that delayed reporting of seizure to the Magistrate under Section 102(3) Cr.P.C. does not vitiate the seizure order, clarifying that such procedural lapses are irregularities and not illegality.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 102 Cr.P.C. seizure of property reporting to Magistrate forthwith

Dharnidhar Mishra and Another v. State of Bihar and Others

13 May 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 415
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that the State must pay just compensation for acquired land without undue delay and set aside the High Court’s order dismissing the claim on delay grounds, remanding for fresh consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Article 300-A right to property

M/S. EMBIO LIMITED v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE

13 May 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 408

The Supreme Court held that penalty under Section 11(2) of the FT Act cannot be imposed for mere non-fulfilment of export obligation and set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 Section 11(2) export obligation penalty

Mrugendra Indravadan Mehta and others v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation

10 May 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 401
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claim for additional land allotment and enhanced compensation under a varied Town Planning Scheme, emphasizing acceptance of allotment and compensation without protest forecloses further claims.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Town Planning Scheme Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 Variation of scheme Compensation

Union of India v. Mrityunjay Kumar Singh

10 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 404
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld bail granted to a terrorism accused under the UAP Act, emphasizing the need for prima facie satisfaction and non-violation of bail conditions before interference.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act terrorism prima facie

Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

10 May 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 400

The Supreme Court granted interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal pending final adjudication of his appeal, emphasizing the exercise of judicial discretion in bail matters considering his political status and ongoing general elections.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 legality of arrest political status and bail

State of Orissa v. Santi Kumar Mitra

10 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 402

The Supreme Court held that the State lawfully determined the lease due to lessee's breaches, allowing resumption of possession and setting aside the High Court's judgment favoring the lessees.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal determination of lease Bihar and Orissa Government Estates Manual, 1919 breach of lease conditions

SHRIRAM CHITS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. RAGHACHAND ASSOCIATES

10 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 403

The Supreme Court held that the service provider bears the burden to prove that the service was availed for commercial purposes to exclude the complainant from the definition of consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, dismissing the appeal and upholding the complaint's maintainability and findings of deficiency of service.

consumer appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 definition of consumer commercial purpose onus of proof

Ali Hossain Mandal & Ors. v. West Bengal Board of Primary Education & Ors.

09 May 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 453
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appointments must follow the prescribed recruitment rules, a Merit List expires after one year without extension, and no appointments can be made from an expired panel, setting aside lower court directions to the contrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant primary school teacher recruitment Merit List validity Recruitment Rules 2016 panel expiry

Rajendra Bhagwanji Umraniya v. State of Gujarat

09 May 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 413

The Supreme Court held that victim compensation under Section 357 CrPC is independent of criminal sentencing and cannot be a ground for remission of sentence, setting aside the High Court's order that linked compensation payment with sentence reduction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 357 CrPC victim compensation sentence reduction remission of sentence

Municipal Committee Katra & Ors. v. Ashwani Kumar

09 May 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 398
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition seeking damages for a contractual dispute and set aside the award of pro-rata compensation to the respondent who caused delay by non-compliance with tender conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction contractual dispute damages nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria

Col. Ramneesh Palsingh v. Sugandhi Aggarwal

08 May 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 397
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored permanent custody of minor children to the father, rejecting unsubstantiated parental alienation claims and emphasizing the paramount welfare principle and the children's clear preference.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody of minor children welfare of child Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 parental alienation syndrome

Mahendra Kaur Arora v. HDFC Bank Ltd.

08 May 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 432

The Supreme Court held that the security deposit refund obligation arises only upon actual handing over of vacant possession, restoring the Rent Tribunal's decree in favor of the landlord and dismissing the intra-court appeal as not maintainable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease agreement security deposit vacant possession rent recovery