Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Abhishek Banerjee & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement

18 Jul 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 668
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of summons issued under Section 50 of the PMLA for personal appearance in New Delhi, ruling that the special procedure under PMLA prevails over Cr.P.C. provisions on territorial jurisdiction and procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 50 PMLA summons territorial jurisdiction

Zubair P v. State of Kerala

18 Jul 2024 · Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 151

The Supreme Court upheld the requirement of subject-specific State Eligibility Test qualification for appointment as Higher Secondary School Teacher under Kerala Education Rules and dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging rejection of his appointment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Higher Secondary School Teacher State Eligibility Test Kerala Education Rules subject-specific qualification

State of Meghalaya v. Lalrintluanga Sailo

16 Jul 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 537
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted under the NDPS Act solely on the accused's HIV status, emphasizing strict compliance with mandatory twin conditions for bail in commercial quantity narcotics cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37(1)(b)(ii) bail commercial quantity

Bihar Staff Selection Commission v. Himal Kumari

16 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 531

The Supreme Court held that minimum qualifying marks apply only to the written test under the Bihar City Manager Cadre Rules, 2014, and prior executive orders cannot override these statutory rules, thereby allowing a candidate with requisite written test marks but no experience to be considered for appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant minimum qualifying marks written examination experience marks Bihar City Manager Cadre Rules 2014

P. RAVINDRANATH & ANR. v. SASIKALA & ORS.

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 533

The Supreme Court held that failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract disentitles plaintiffs from specific performance and dismissed the suit while awarding compensation for the advance paid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness agreement to sell time essence of contract

Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 529

The Supreme Court set aside the withdrawal of prosecution against a politically influential accused in a double murder case, condemning delay tactics and directing expeditious trial to uphold justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant withdrawal of prosecution Section 321 CrPC political influence criminal revision petition

Baba Natarajan Prasad v. M. Revathi

15 Jul 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 523
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the offence of bigamy under Section 494 IPC is serious and modified an unduly lenient sentence of imprisonment till the rising of the court to six months simple imprisonment, emphasizing the principle of proportionality in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 494 IPC bigamy proportionality in sentencing imprisonment till rising of court

S. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

15 Jul 2024 · Sanjay Kumar; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 521
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the NPPA’s demand for recovery of excess price charged by the appellant under Paragraph 13 of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995, dismissing the appeal and clarifying the scope of liability of distributors under the statute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 Paragraph 13 DPCO overcharged amount recovery National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority

MANCH BIHAR, PATNA v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 528

The Supreme Court held that only Parliament can amend the Scheduled Castes list under Article 341, quashed Bihar's Notification merging "Tanti-Tantwa" with Scheduled Castes, and restored reservation benefits accordingly.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 341 Scheduled Castes list State Government Notification Parliamentary legislation

Ram Prakash Chadha v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

15 Jul 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 522
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court allowed discharge of the appellant in a custodial death case, holding that mere suspicion without prosecution material disclosing criminal conspiracy or involvement is insufficient to proceed under Section 227 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 227 CrPC discharge application custodial death criminal conspiracy

Amro Devi & Ors. v. Julfi Ram (Deceased) & Ors.

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 527

The Supreme Court held that an oral settlement without a written compromise deed is not a valid compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and upheld the validity of a sale deed executed during pendency of appeal, setting aside the appellate decrees and confirming the Trial Court's dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC compromise decree sale deed lis pendens

State of Punjab v. M/S Punjab Spintex Ltd.

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 526

The Supreme Court held that exemption from Market fee under Punjab's Industrial Policy, 2003 does not extend to Rural Development fee, as they are distinct levies under separate statutes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Market fee Rural Development fee Industrial Policy 2003 Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act 1961

Kiran Jyot Maini v. Anish Pramod Patel

15 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 530
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dissolved a long-standing broken marriage under Article 142 and fixed Rs. 2 Crores as one-time permanent alimony, balancing the parties' financial positions and closing interim maintenance claims.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India permanent alimony interim maintenance

Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

12 Jul 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 512
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that arrests under Section 19(1) of the PML Act must satisfy strict statutory preconditions, including furnishing the 'reasons to believe' to the arrestee, and are subject to judicial review to prevent arbitrary deprivation of liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 19 PML Act arrest legality reasons to believe grounds of arrest

Harpreet Singh Talwar @ Kabir Talwar v. The State of Gujarat

12 Jul 2024 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 662

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea in a major transnational narcotics smuggling case, holding that prima facie evidence and risks of witness tampering justify continued custody under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant regular bail Section 43D(5) UAPA NDPS Act criminal conspiracy

MD. RAHIM ALI @ ABDUR RAHIM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

11 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 511

The Supreme Court held that the Foreigners Act proceedings must disclose the material basis of allegations to the accused to satisfy natural justice before shifting the burden of proof, setting aside the declaration of the appellant as a foreigner for failure to do so.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Foreigners Act, 1946 Section 9 burden of proof Foreigners Tribunal Natural justice

M/S NEW WIN EXPORT & ANR. v. A. SUBRAMANIAM

11 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 535
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction under Section 138 NI Act based on a genuine settlement and payment, emphasizing the importance of compounding offences to prioritize compensation over punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Cheque dishonour Compounding of offence

Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

10 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 519
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's discharge from prosecution under Section 306 IPC, holding that mere allegations of harassment without proximate instigation or aid to suicide are insufficient to sustain abetment charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Mens rea Instigation

Vikas Kanaujia v. Sarita

10 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 517

The Supreme Court dissolved a 22-year estranged marriage under Article 142 on the ground of irretrievable breakdown despite opposition, setting aside the High Court's refusal to grant divorce.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India divorce cruelty

Shanmugasekar v. The State of Tamil Nadu

10 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 504

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, ruling that deliberate assault with a deadly weapon causing death without grave and sudden provocation constitutes murder.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Murder Intention Eyewitness testimony