Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

V. Vincent Velankanni v. The Union of India and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Sandeep Mehta; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 748
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that seniority in industrial establishments must be reckoned from the date of promotion after probation and trade test completion as per applicable rules, and a subsequent Government Order restoring seniority reckoning from initial appointment applies prospectively only.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant seniority probation trade test promotion

K. Vadivel v. K. Shanthi

30 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 746

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing further investigation in a murder trial, holding that such power must be exercised sparingly and only on sound legal grounds, and directed the trial to conclude expeditiously.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant further investigation Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. Section 311 Cr.P.C. post-cognizance stage

Atul Kumar v. The Chairman (Joint Seat Allocation Authority) and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 749

The Supreme Court allowed admission to a Scheduled Caste candidate who missed the fee payment deadline due to procedural difficulties, invoking Article 142 to grant relief and create a supernumerary seat.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution of India Admission to educational institutions Scheduled Caste reservation JEE Advanced 2024

Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd v. Jhabua Power Limited and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 768

The Supreme Court held that State Electricity Regulatory Commissions are guided but not bound by State Government policy directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that review of regulatory orders requires demonstration of error, thereby upholding APTEL's setting aside of KSERC's review order approving power purchase agreements based solely on such directions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 108 State Electricity Regulatory Commission policy directions

Manisha Ravindra Panpatil v. The State of Maharashtra

27 Sep 2024 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 762

The Supreme Court set aside the summary removal of a woman Sarpanch based on unverified allegations, emphasizing the need for proper inquiry and protection against discriminatory administrative actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant elected representative removal Sarpanch disqualification government land encroachment natural justice

LAKHA SINGH v. BALWINDER SINGH

27 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 744
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside concurrent judgments upholding a disputed agreement to sell agricultural land, finding the agreement fabricated and the findings of fact perverse, thereby allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell earnest money concurrent findings

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited v. M/s Sanman Rice Mills

27 Sep 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 742

The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act have limited jurisdiction confined to grounds under Section 34 and cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their view for the arbitrator's, restoring the arbitral award set aside by the High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Sanjay Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

27 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 745
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a censure entry on a police officer's service record, holding that the procedure under the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers Rules, 1991 and principles of natural justice were duly followed.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant censure entry natural justice show cause notice Uttar Pradesh Police Officers Rules 1991

Ahmednagar District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

27 Sep 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 741

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's belated challenge to an auction sale of cooperative society property, upholding the sale to a statutory body while directing payment of dues to the appellant under Article 142.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant auction sale Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 valuation undervaluation

V. Senthil Balaji v. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement

26 Sep 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 739
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court granted bail to a PMLA accused after prolonged pre-trial incarceration, holding that the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 overrides stringent statutory bail restrictions when trial delay is unreasonable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act bail speedy trial Article 21

Janardan Das & Ors. v. Durga Prasad Agarwalla & Ors.

26 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 778

The Supreme Court held that plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness and that the agent lacked authority to bind co-owners, thus dismissing specific performance and upholding the bona fide sale to appellants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness General Power of Attorney co-owners

Shivkumar Ramsundar Saket v. State of Maharashtra

26 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 759

The Supreme Court upheld convictions but set aside the death sentence on appellant Shivkumar Ramsundar Saket, restoring the Trial Court's sentence, emphasizing that death penalty should be reserved for 'rarest of rare' cases and not imposed selectively without clear segregation of roles.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of rare circumstantial evidence witness credibility

Vijay Singh v. State of Bihar

25 Sep 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 735

The Supreme Court acquitted all accused in a murder and abduction case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, failure to prove residence and motive, and improper reversal of acquittal by the High Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction murder circumstantial evidence reversal of acquittal

Shoyeb Raja v. State of Madhya Pradesh

25 Sep 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 731
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that charges under Section 307 IPC must be framed if prima facie material indicates intent to cause death, even if injuries are minor, and set aside acquittal to direct trial on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC framing of charge intention to kill common intention

In Re: Remarks by High Court Judge During Court Proceedings

25 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna; B R Gavai; Surya Ka... · 2024 INSC 758

The Supreme Court addressed inappropriate remarks made by a High Court Judge during live-streamed proceedings, accepted the Judge's apology, and emphasized the need for judicial impartiality and decorum in the digital age without imposing further sanctions.

administrative other Significant judicial impartiality live streaming judicial conduct apology in court

Baljinder Singh @ Ladoo and Others v. State of Punjab

25 Sep 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 738

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under sections 148, 302, and 307 IPC read with section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention can be inferred from conduct and minor discrepancies in injured eyewitness testimony do not vitiate conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant common intention section 34 IPC section 149 IPC injured eyewitness

Manik & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 734

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for custodial death under Section 304 Part II IPC but acquitted appellants of charges under Section 201 IPC due to failure of prosecution to conclusively prove the identity of the recovered dead body as that of the deceased.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant custodial death fingerprint evidence identity of dead body Section 304 Part II IPC

Prakash Bhalotia v. Indra Chandra Goyal

25 Sep 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 941

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord’s appeal and ordered eviction of the tenant for continuous default in payment of rent under the UP Rent Act, emphasizing statutory tenancy protection is conditional on timely rent payment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972 Section 20 UP Rent Act Section 30 UP Rent Act statutory tenancy

Kailashben Mahendrabhai Patel & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

25 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 737
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC as an abuse of process, holding that vague allegations intertwined with a civil dispute do not warrant prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR abuse of process Section 498A IPC

Vijay Singh v. State of Bihar

25 Sep 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 759

The Supreme Court acquitted all accused in a murder and abduction case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, failure to prove residence and motive conclusively, and improper reversal of acquittal by the High Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction murder circumstantial evidence reversal of acquittal