Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

R.K. Munshi v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir

02 May 2024 · B.R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 365

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the recovery of unauthorized House Rent Allowance drawn by a government employee residing in government accommodation allotted to his retired father, applying Rule 6(h)(i) and (ii) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Rules, 1992.

civil appeal_dismissed House Rent Allowance Government accommodation Recovery notice Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Rules

Chaitra Nagammanavar v. State of Karnataka

02 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 367

The Supreme Court held that the 2001 Rules apply to university appointments for backlog vacancies, binding the university to follow its advertised mode of selection, and dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the appointment of a preferential candidate.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation backlog vacancies Scheduled Tribes Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000

Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

02 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 366

The Supreme Court set aside the summoning order under Section 319 Cr.P.C. due to insufficient evidence against the appellants, emphasizing the high threshold for exercising this extraordinary power.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning order extraordinary power prima facie case

Deependra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh

01 May 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 362

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidity of an amendment segregating meritorious reserved candidates, validated the normalization of two main examination results, and dismissed appeals challenging the High Court’s directions on recruitment process fairness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Madhya Pradesh State Service Examination Rules, 2015 Rule 4 amendment reservation category candidates normalization of marks

Commissioner of Trade and Taxes v. Femc Pratibha Joint Venture

01 May 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 364

The Supreme Court held that the mandatory refund timeline under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act must be strictly followed, and refund amounts cannot be retained or adjusted against dues arising after the refund period, dismissing the department's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 38 refund timeline adjustment of refund tax refund

Sharif Ahmed and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

01 May 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 363
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court clarified the mandatory contents of chargesheets under Section 173(2) CrPC and quashed a chargesheet for lack of sufficient particulars and evidence to sustain offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant chargesheet Section 173(2) CrPC police report cognizance

Union of India v. Asket Singh

01 May 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 409

The Supreme Court upheld the grant of solatium and interest for inordinate delay in payment of compensation under the 1952 Act, reading such reliefs into the statute to prevent arbitrariness and protect property rights.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 solatium interest on compensation delay in compensation

Hanna v. State of Uttar Pradesh

01 May 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 390

The Supreme Court set aside murder convictions due to unreliable prosecution evidence, material contradictions, and procedural lapses including withholding of material witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC hostile witness material omissions adverse inference

M/S. BISCO LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE

30 Apr 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 231

The Supreme Court held that goods stored outside a notified bonded warehouse but within factory premises with official permission are not improperly removed under the Customs Act, setting aside duty and confiscation demands on such goods while upholding liability for missing goods.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 warehousing public bonded warehouse improper removal

Ajay Ishwar Ghute v. Meher K. Patel

30 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 353

The Supreme Court held that orders passed in terms of 'Minutes of Order' must ensure impleadment of all necessary parties and compliance with natural justice, setting aside a High Court order permitting construction of a compound wall without hearing affected third parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Minutes of Order Article 226 non-joinder of parties natural justice

Jasobanta Sahu v. State of Orissa

30 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 349
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, dubious extra-judicial confession, and questionable weapon recovery, holding that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony extra-judicial confession

Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur v. Jindal Drugs Ltd.

30 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 354

The Supreme Court held that labelling of goods under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act amounts to manufacture, entitling cenvat credit and rebate, and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Note 3 to Chapter 18 manufacture

THR LRS. v. SHYAM LAL CHAUHAN

30 Apr 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 352

The Supreme Court held that the appellate court must follow proper procedure under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC by considering subordinate court reports and objections before substituting legal representatives, and remanded the matter for fresh decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 22 Rule 5 CPC legal representative substitution civil appeal

New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. M/s Tata Steel Ltd.

30 Apr 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 356

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's right to settle the fire insurance claim on depreciation basis at 60% due to the insured's failure to comply with the Reinstatement Value Clause and furnish necessary documents.

insurance appeal_allowed Significant Reinstatement Value Clause Depreciation Insurance claim Fire insurance policy

BANK OF INDIA v. PANKAJ SRIVASTAVA

30 Apr 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 538

The Supreme Court held that dependents of a deceased employee are entitled to compassionate appointment unless major penalty proceedings were formally initiated or clearly contemplated before death, dismissing the Bank's appeal and directing consideration of the claim.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment disciplinary proceedings major penalty charge sheet

Priyanka Jaiswal v. State of Jharkhand

30 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 357
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court partially set aside the High Court's quashing of dowry harassment proceedings, holding that prima facie allegations and territorial jurisdiction justified continuation against certain accused, while quashing proceedings against others due to vague allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR domestic violence dowry harassment

Suresh @ Unni @ Vadi Suresh v. State of Kerala

30 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 350

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable identification and lack of credible evidence, emphasizing the necessity of reliable identification procedures and proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identification parade injured eyewitness reasonable doubt recovery of evidence

Firdoskhan Khurshidkhan v. The State of Gujarat

30 Apr 2024 · Sandeep Mehta; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 351

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of one accused for heroin possession under the NDPS Act while acquitting the co-accused due to unreliable identification and inadmissible confessional statements.

criminal appeal_allowed (for Firdoskhan), appeal_dismissed (for Anwarkhan) Significant NDPS Act search and seizure confessional statement Section 67 NDPS Act

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

30 Apr 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2024 INSC 358
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court affirmed Rajasthan's power to levy stamp duty on insurance policies under the 1952 Act but set aside recovery orders due to non-availability of stamps and inapplicability of cash payment provisions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant stamp duty insurance policies legislative competence Entry 91 List I

A v. State of Maharashtra

29 Apr 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 371

The Supreme Court upheld the fundamental right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21, directing that medical boards must consider the physical and mental health of pregnant persons beyond 24 weeks gestation and giving primacy to the pregnant person's consent in termination decisions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 reproductive autonomy fundamental rights Article 21