Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Yugal Sikri v. State of U.P.

30 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 597

The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act must specifically aver breach of a binding settlement and be filed with proper government authority under Section 34(1), and quashed proceedings where these conditions were not met.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 29 ID Act Section 34 ID Act Section 482 CrPC

Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India

30 Jul 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 558

The Supreme Court held that State Bar Councils cannot charge enrolment fees beyond the statutory amount prescribed under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, and other fees cannot be made mandatory pre-conditions for enrolment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Advocates Act, 1961 enrolment fee State Bar Councils Bar Council of India

YASH DEVELOPERS v. HARIHAR KRUPA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

30 Jul 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2024 INSC 559
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a slum rehabilitation developer's agreement for inordinate delay and lack of bona fide efforts, emphasizing the statutory duty and accountability of authorities under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Section 13(2) Slum Rehabilitation Authority Judicial review

PIC DEPARTMENTALS PVT. LTD. v. SREELEATHERS PVT. LTD.

30 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 654

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretion to allow a delayed Written Statement due to registry confusion, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant extension of time written statement condonation of delay procedural rules

Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

30 Jul 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1107
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that death after nine months due to injuries inflicted by the accused maintains the chain of causation and the High Court erred in reducing the conviction to attempt to murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC causation intention

VIDYA AND OTHERS v. M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD.

29 Jul 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 557

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal directing refund of amounts paid for delayed possession of a flat with interest at 12% per annum, rejecting the Developer's force majeure defense.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant real estate delay refund with interest force majeure flat buyer agreement

Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors v. Prakash Kumar Dixit

29 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 575
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against a Single Judge's contempt order that crystallizes substantive rights, restoring the appeal for merits consideration regarding promotion entitlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19 appeal Letters Patent Appeal Promotion entitlement

NEK PAL v. NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

26 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 574
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a second appeal under Section 100 CPC cannot be finally heard without prior framing and notice of substantial questions of law, setting aside the High Court judgment and restoring the appeals for fresh hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second appeal Substantial question of law Framing of issues

UP ROADWAYS RETIRED OFFICIALS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

26 Jul 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court held that former Uttar Pradesh Roadways employees who never held pensionable posts as per relevant Government Orders and regulations are not entitled to pension, dismissing their appeals and clarifying pension rights under statutory provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension entitlement Uttar Pradesh Roadways State Roadways Transport Corporation Government Orders

Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/S Steel Authority of India

25 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; B.V. Nagarathna · 2024 INSC 554

The Supreme Court held that royalty under the MMDR Act is not a tax and that the Act limits State powers to tax mineral rights, clarifying the constitutional division of legislative powers over mineral taxation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant royalty mineral rights taxation Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

Manharan Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

25 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Prashant Kumar Mishra; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 560

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to the prosecution's failure to prove his presence at the relevant time and held that the burden under Section 106 Evidence Act cannot be shifted without cogent evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act last seen together burden of proof

Chairman, National Highways Authority of India v. Arvind Kumar Thakur

24 Jul 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 556

The Supreme Court allowed NHAI's appeal, holding that toll collection on a partially completed highway section under BOT contract is lawful and toll amounts collected need not be refunded.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Highways Authority of India toll collection Build Operate Transfer National Highways Fee Rules 2008

SHRI GURUDATTA SUGARS MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. PRITHVIRAJ SAYAJIRAO DESHMUKH

24 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 551
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that authorized signatories of a company are not 'drawers' under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act and cannot be directed to pay interim compensation, limiting such liability to the drawer company alone.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 143-A drawer authorized signatory

Vanshika Yadav v. Union of India

23 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 553

The Supreme Court held that the NEET (UG) 2024 question paper leak was localized and not systemic, declined to order a re-test, accepted expert opinion on a disputed question, and directed result revision while allowing individual grievances to be pursued in High Courts.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant NEET (UG) 2024 question paper leak systemic breach examination integrity

M/S NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING CO. LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

23 Jul 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2024 INSC 547

The Supreme Court held that customs duty liability arises under Section 125 upon redemption of confiscated goods by payment of fine, must be assessed under Section 28, and interest under Section 28AB is payable on delayed duty payment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs duty Confiscation Section 125 Customs Act Section 28 Customs Act

The Goa Foundation v. The Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority & Ors.

23 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 561
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the NGT orders permitting Tiracol Bridge construction without hearing objections, restored the application for merits hearing by the correct zonal bench, emphasizing natural justice and environmental rights under Article 21.

environmental_law appeal_partly_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 principles of natural justice Coastal Regulation Zone Notification No Development Zone

Rajinder Kaur v. Gurbhajan Kaur

23 Jul 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 552

In a partition suit, co-sharers possessing property beyond their ownership share are liable to render accounts or pay mesne profits, and purchasers obtaining vacant possession cannot evade this liability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit rendition of accounts mesne profits co-sharers

BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. v. SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. & Anr.

23 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 548
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that approval of a resolution plan of a corporate guarantor extinguishes only the guarantor’s liability and does not discharge the principal corporate debtor’s liability, permitting simultaneous insolvency proceedings against both under the IBC.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant corporate insolvency resolution process corporate guarantor liability Section 7 IBC application subrogation Section 140 Contract Act

A.S. Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayati Medical Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

23 Jul 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 690
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compounding an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires the complainant's consent and set aside the High Court's order compounding without such consent, while quashing the proceedings under Article 142 in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC compounding offence

Gene Campaign & Another v. Union of India & Others

23 Jul 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 545
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that the approval for environmental release of GM mustard DMH-11 violated constitutional and environmental principles, mandating regulatory reforms, transparency, and a moratorium on certain GM crops.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Genetically Modified Organisms Environmental Release Precautionary Principle Public Trust Doctrine