Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Shripal & Anr. v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 144
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that termination of workmen during conciliation proceedings without statutory compliance is illegal, directing reinstatement with continuity, partial back wages, and a fair process for regularization despite recruitment bans.

labor appeal_allowed Significant U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 6E Section 6N termination during conciliation

Karuppudayar v. State

31 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 132
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under the SC-ST Act as the alleged caste-based abuse did not occur in a place within public view, a necessary ingredient for the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC SC-ST Act public view quashing of criminal proceedings

C & C Constructions Ltd. v. IRCON International Ltd.

31 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 138
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld a contractual clause barring claims for damages due to employer-caused delays and dismissed the appellant's challenge to the arbitral award rejecting such claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 clause 49.[5] GCC extension of time limitation of liability

Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 136

The Supreme Court held that temporary employees appointed against sanctioned posts under a Special Recruitment Drive are entitled to regular pay-scale benefits after three years, overruling the High Court Division Bench's denial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Special Recruitment Drive Regular pay-scale Temporary employees Part-time sweepers

Karan Singh v. State of Haryana

31 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 133
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment soon before death, thus negating the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

JASMINBHAI BHARATBHAI KOTHARI v. STATE OF GUJARAT

30 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 172

The Supreme Court held that exemption from surrendering under Order XXII Rule 5 of its Rules is only maintainable where the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment, and dismissed the petition challenging refusal to extend temporary bail as infructuous after the petitioner surrendered.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 5 exemption from surrendering temporary bail sentence of imprisonment

SURESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

30 Jan 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 156
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under circumstantial evidence principles.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC proof beyond reasonable doubt burden of proof

N. Usha Rani v. Moodudula Srinivas

30 Jan 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 129

The Supreme Court held that a woman de facto separated from her first husband and knowingly married again is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC despite the absence of a legal divorce decree.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC second marriage subsisting marriage

R. Rajebdran v. District Collector

30 Jan 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 131

The Supreme Court upheld the continuing liability of polluting tanneries to pay compensation and remediate environmental damage beyond 1998, directing enforcement of pollution control and compensation measures in Vellore District.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant polluter pays principle precautionary principle environmental compensation tannery pollution

Ashok Saxena v. State of Uttarakhand

30 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 148

The Supreme Court modified the conviction of Ashok Saxena from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-I IPC applying the doctrine of transfer of malice and reduced his sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Section 301 IPC Doctrine of transfer of malice

M/S. JM LABORATORIES AND OTHERS v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER

30 Jan 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 127

The Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings against JM Laboratories due to the trial court's failure to assign reasons while summoning the accused, emphasizing the necessity of judicial mind application in issuing process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summoning order Section 204 CrPC reasons for issuance of process Drugs and Cosmetics Act

INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

30 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 128

The Supreme Court held that sale of drugs between licensed manufacturers under Form 25 does not violate the Drugs and Cosmetics Act even if the buyer lacks a Form 20B license, and quashed the complaint and summoning order for lack of application of mind by the Magistrate.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 manufacture definition Form 25 license Form 20B license

Parimal Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

30 Jan 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 134
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that eligibility criteria prescribed at recruitment commencement cannot be altered mid-process and only JTET-qualified candidates were eligible for Jharkhand teacher recruitment, setting aside the High Court's direction permitting CTET/STET candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Teacher Eligibility Test Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act Section 23 RTE Act JTET

Mahabir & Ors. v. State of Haryana

29 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 120
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction reversing acquittal under revisional jurisdiction, holding such conversion impermissible without retrial and emphasizing procedural safeguards and the non-retrospective nature of victim's appellate rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 401 CrPC revisional jurisdiction Acquittal conversion prohibited Victim's right to appeal proviso Section 372 CrPC Natural justice in criminal revision

INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD v. GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS

29 Jan 2025 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 124

The Supreme Court held that prior approval of the Competition Commission of India is mandatory before the Committee of Creditors can approve a resolution plan containing a combination under Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 31(4) proviso Competition Commission of India approval Committee of Creditors

Ajai Kumar Chauhan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

29 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 140
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove premeditation and intent beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide

S. VISHNU GANGA & Ors. v. M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & Ors.

29 Jan 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 123

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's compensation award, holding that loss of income and future prospects must be assessed considering the deceased's active business role and that continuation of business by dependents does not negate pecuniary loss.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of income future prospects

SHANKAR LAL SHARMA v. RAJESH KOOLWAL

29 Jan 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 200
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court disposed of a Special Leave Petition by directing a monetary settlement to the petitioner and emphasized the crucial role of advocates in providing voluntary legal assistance to indigent litigants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Special Leave Petition Amicus Curiae Settlement Access to Justice

DR. TANVI BEHL v. SHREY GOEL

29 Jan 2025 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 125

The Supreme Court held that domicile or residence-based reservation in PG Medical courses is constitutionally invalid, mandating merit-based admissions except for permissible institutional preferences.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant residence-based reservation domicile PG Medical Courses Article 14

Narcotic Control Bureau v. Lakhwinder Singh

29 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 190

The Supreme Court held that bail pending appeal under the NDPS Act can be granted before serving half the sentence if justified, upholding the High Court's order and emphasizing judicial discretion and fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail pending appeal NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act suspension of sentence