High Court of Karnataka
48 judgments
d5956633e92f15eed129e1ae9d1b35eaf4896e74f8d53046b6c926f3d4abc467
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and cruelty under Sections 302, 498J, and 304 Part I IPC, affirming that consistent circumstantial evidence and credible prosecution proof justify the conviction.
a95270d3bde720c02c8da59dbc86b40973ea91b4c1a3e4374e98e8c814dad6b4
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death and murder under Sections 302 and 498J IPC, affirming the application of presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act and the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence.
72c6fdc529b84629b90318159bf6ef67429b1be5e48e2822f69d51c9707cbc46
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction and death sentence under Section 302 IPC, affirming that the case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category warranting capital punishment.
12bfafcce117db524e167cea426352e80d365f62af8e78e292e674de8236c02c
The court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Indian Penal Code for criminal breach of trust and dishonor of cheque, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
c6b9c4e1173ea5e500279fcc034c9874af6958be1a15bf942b9335f81f29c56d
The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that the prosecution proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence.
dabb9e84111f72eb3144f94af6829416723bc837ff40e9a9ee36028a7ff63c1e
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 160(2) of the Karnataka Police Act, affirming that unauthorized entry into a protected area is punishable and procedural irregularities not affecting core evidence do not vitiate conviction.
bc0f1aca2581f56977c956c35c69a3231d8e1c3a0c965f6200e4a329d3859cc2
The Supreme Court upheld the recovery of Rs. 6,00,000/- from a government employee under Sections 118(J), 138, and 139 of the Indian Evidence Act, affirming the presumption of correctness of official documents and the burden on the appellant to rebut it.
2fd4df2c91d15c9886e994ec92f332fd6f633d0ac5f242ebb126bef4a0104a0a
The court upheld the liability of the respondent for cheque dishonor under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, affirming the lower courts' orders for repayment of Rs. 6,00,000/- with interest and costs.
1f4a2cf150275d0649d2d7a2c12465fa40becb1d11e6c171b8cc5d64e37154da
The High Court upheld the appellate court's decision dismissing the petitioner's claim to exclusive ownership and possession of disputed property due to insufficient proof of title and possession.
ae4f4f78b6e7f71cffb1b0b61401ba64ee3d3eb021dd66bfcec274b042087b2e
The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that the accused had common intention to commit murder and the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
43e9bd934d303a53d79867cef49e2f8edd49c52f68d7636ba54012edb9074348
The court upheld the conviction and sentence for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming that intentional infliction of fatal injuries constitutes murder.
065c6b50f9acf9054c1599131a4bd6758eb8da4e1e78838e1a2eac425c22999e
The court held that Consumer Forums have jurisdiction over cooperative societies providing services, affirming consumer protection laws apply alongside cooperative laws.
ef860a3748bc26005dc2981c30f3e399caedaaa9546fb9000f55aa2b29286e0f
The court held that tenancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act arise from actual possession and cultivation, allowing the appellant's claim and setting aside conflicting ownership claims.
caabce444a427420d053cfe82ee6cd85e54962433e8640c18e6c8d2ab18a4b2e
The court dismissed the appeal, holding that tenancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act must be strictly determined as per statutory provisions and prior government notifications, upholding the validity of the impugned orders.
043ac9c73fef78ea61c851bf17a065a8a5995e83391a0bc5645c453ed5f7ed5a
The court allowed the appeal directing correct pay fixation and increments for the petitioner in accordance with applicable government orders and service rules, including arrears and consequential benefits.
c1bc424761b0d20a762d469bb680be356969f26b6581b1b3cc43f6f35702fc8c
The High Court upheld the conviction under the Karnataka Control of Organized Crime Act, 2005, affirming that credible evidence and proper application of law justify the appellant's conviction for organized crime and extortion.
bdc325b44fd56e4d6b939bd11f25755be0a6ddb65aee47e286cce81bb33f17b8
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellant for criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust, and forgery under various IPC sections, affirming the sufficiency of evidence and procedural compliance.
c0f19acb77b46e91bdf8e17a4ec87ca81461fb20260e6a3d81f3079eb3359330
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for criminal conspiracy, cheating, and breach of trust, affirming the admissibility and sufficiency of documentary and expert evidence.
434991ecb6e4fbdb1013cde235d1d2f516b96c6b5029ace62411a6bf02457892
The Karnataka High Court upheld the conviction of the accused for dowry harassment and murder under Sections 498-J and 302 IPC, affirming that consistent circumstantial and medical evidence proved the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
73ec181ed35da8356174c13238624b9df8498b9270a145780398c368e0d9297d
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence for murder and related offences, affirming the trial and High Court's findings based on cogent evidence and proper application of law.