High Court of Karnataka
48 judgments
c736bd72398ac902e753ac2ff084dd6b88f169638c8f69dc589e0d8beaed5614
The Karnataka High Court upheld the conviction of the accused for criminal trespass and outraging the modesty of a woman under IPC and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, affirming the sufficiency of evidence and correct application of law.
f428731c77515c2af3bfcfc159c13f4b6432f3c3cac1e778e98d1a4a8a12db04
The court upheld the recovery of principal and interest within statutory limits under the Karnataka Money Lenders Act, dismissing the respondent's challenge and confirming the decree.
61881d690a3387ed1348a616431e6db1d4ac70c741abb5c3a9c5dfd71add2594
The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with the Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1957 invalidates a loan recovery claim and set aside the decree in favor of the lender.
4231c5507d4ccb4d48bea24b0474d81915cb4cc2a05867f3eaf909777b9d2a11
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence for voluntarily causing hurt with dangerous weapons and related offences, affirming the sufficiency of prosecution evidence and the correctness of the courts below.
259247f1f6331dc9e93ff54a8eec5b85d610e5ea1bab4d48223643aedcac0945
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 65 of the Karnataka Excise Act, affirming that proper seizure and evidence are essential for sustaining conviction and limiting interference under Section 482 CrPC.
5a88e7ecba8ef0c2a16e0218ffd48820050bb3a215b6b4a989fbb30a0855e12a
The Karnataka High Court upheld enforcement of the Contract Labour Act, 1974 against a contractor for non-compliance with labor welfare provisions, dismissing the appeal against penalties imposed.
40002460fa0d1617d7364c38d8ebe11fe13551f4fdc26c744d759ea9224c7024
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence, affirming the correct application of criminal law principles and statutory provisions without violation of fundamental rights.
091f2a3614000ddf19eed50f080085ded2b21c52492854deac20ce830e49e583
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 136 CrPC, affirming the necessity of credible evidence and procedural compliance to ensure a fair trial under Article 21.