High Court of Bombay

4,240 judgments

Year:

Sandeep Tanaji Bangar & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

30 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court quashed the Education Officer's rejection of a private school teacher's transfer proposal for failure to grant opportunity to cure deficiencies and directed reconsideration in accordance with law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer approval private school teachers natural justice deficiency cure

Tanangi Kenchappa Gurubala v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

30 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court regularized a full-time teacher’s appointment made in violation of reservation rules, balancing legality with equity, and directed backlog clearance and penalties on the Management.

administrative petition_allowed Significant reservation roster regularization of service illegal appointment backlog clearance

High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Vineeta Srinandan

29 Jan 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court convicted Mrs. Vineeta Srinandan for criminal contempt for issuing a derogatory circular scandalizing the judiciary, sentencing her to one week imprisonment and fine, while accepting the Board's apology and disowning of the publication.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 scandalizing court judicial authority

Wonderchef Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Swaminarayanan Pty Ltd

27 Jan 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court granted a limited 90-day injunction restraining a distributor from disparaging the manufacturer’s products pending arbitration, balancing contractual obligations with free commercial speech.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 interim injunction commercial speech confidential information

Nitin Prabodhchandra Gadekar v. The State Bank of India

27 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The High Court upheld the appellate court's discretion to set aside a judgment on admission in a lease dispute, holding that such judgment requires clear, unambiguous admission and proper interpretation of lease termination provisions under Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission lease determination Section 111 Transfer of Property Act

M/s. Amar Builders v. Champalal Indraraj Sand alias Rahtekar & Ors.

27 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing cross-objections in a civil appeal where the appeal was stayed and not taken up for final hearing, emphasizing the wide discretion under Order XLI Rule 22 CPC.

civil petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay cross-objections Order XLI Rule 22 CPC extension of time

Millan Pradhan v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Jan 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of university rules annulling exam performance for revealing identity and requiring passing all 1st year MBBS subjects before promotion, dismissing the petition challenging these regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unfair means medical education MBBS examination annulment of performance

wp32492023 134e5e89

24 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court issued procedural directions for removal of office objections and scheduled the hearing dates for multiple criminal appellate matters.

criminal other Procedural office objections interim order listing of matters criminal appellate jurisdiction

Anil Shivajirao Bhosale v. Directorate of Enforcement

24 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused under PMLA after he completed half the maximum sentence, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA Section 436A CrPC Bail

M/s.N.K Proteins Limited v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Jan 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the MPID Act and the court has discretion to condone delay beyond 30 days under Section 5(3), dismissing the appellant's challenge to the condonation order.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5(3) MPID Act condonation of delay

Sabyasachi Devpriya Nishank v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an intoxicated driver charged with rash and negligent driving causing damage, imposing community service and monetary conditions to balance public safety and the accused's future prospects.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail rash and negligent driving intoxication community service

Mangesh Girish Sarjerao v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Jan 2025 · Nitin W. Sambre; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing issuance of a 'Thakar' Scheduled Tribe certificate to the petitioner, holding that affidavits and caste validity certificates of paternal relatives are admissible evidence to discharge the burden of proof.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe certificate Thakar tribe burden of proof caste validity certificate

Shri Dnyaneshwar Baban Katkar v. The Director General and Inspector General of Police

22 Jan 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking correction of date of birth in service records beyond the prescribed five-year period under service rules, holding that the Registration of Births and Deaths Act does not override service conditions and emphasizing the adverse impact of belated changes on service benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant date of birth correction Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1981 Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 service book entry

Jadhav Satish Vijay v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Jan 2025 · Nitin W. Sambre; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Bombay High Court held that cancellation of a CISF appointment for alleged suppression of criminal antecedents was illegal where the petitioner had truthfully disclosed and was acquitted, directing reinstatement with continuity of service.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant criminal antecedents disclosure public employment cancellation of appointment

Shree Jagrutti Cooperative Housing Society Ltd v. Shree Jagruti CHS Proposed

22 Jan 2025 · Amit Borkar

The High Court held that registration of cooperative housing societies under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires a reasoned order recording statutory compliance, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration due to absence of such reasons.

administrative remanded Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Section 9 registration reasoned order quasi-judicial decision

Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani & Prajakta Chandrashekhar Chaugule v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

21 Jan 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a removed slum rehabilitation developer loses rights to free sale area but State authorities must act lawfully and in good faith, setting aside unlawful demolition and directing compensation or equivalent area to petitioners.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Slum Rehabilitation Authority Section 13(2) Slum Act Free sale area Demolition

Sukhshanti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Mr. Nishant M. Mahimtura & Ors.

21 Jan 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held flat owners guilty of contempt for unauthorized amalgamation of flats without municipal permission, directed strict enforcement by BMC, and ordered restoration of the premises.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Unauthorized construction Amalgamation of flats Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai BMC Act enforcement

Rakesh Brijlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra

21 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

Criminal proceedings under PMLA and IPC were quashed as the dispute was contractual and no prima facie offence of cheating or money laundering was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 cheating criminal breach of trust proceeds of crime

Navneet Singh Gogia and Simran Kaur Gogia v. The State of Maharashtra and Sushma B. Chandak

21 Jan 2025 · S. M. MODAK
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that in cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, the trial court may proceed and convict in absence of the accused without recording Section 313 statement if the accused persistently absents without justification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 313 CrPC absence of accused summary trial

Jaysingh Revaji Patil v. The Municipal Corporation Malegaon

21 Jan 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge a Municipal Corporation notice under Sections 52 and 53 of the MRTP Act and must seek remedy against the landlord in civil court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant tenant rights Municipal Corporation notice Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act 1966 Section 52 MRTP Act