High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Brijesh Kumar Srivastava & Ors. v. The Union of India & Ors.

31 Jan 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition to condone delay in filing an application for interest on delayed payments to Naval Dockyard employees, emphasizing that plausible explanations for delay must be liberally considered.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Central Administrative Tribunal interest on delayed payment equitable treatment

Vicky Bharat Kalyani v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

31 Jan 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court referred to a Larger Bench the interpretation of Sections 50, 41, and 41A Cr.P.C. concerning procedural safeguards during arrest, emphasizing the need for uniformity and protection of fundamental rights.

criminal other Significant Section 50 Cr.P.C. grounds of arrest Section 41 Cr.P.C. Section 41A Cr.P.C.

Avinash Ajay Benewal v. The State of Maharashtra

31 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an 18-year-old accused in a robbery case, emphasizing rehabilitation and education continuity under the Probation of Offenders Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail young offender Probation of Offenders Act education disruption

M/s. Atria Constructions v. The Municipal Commis, Pune

31 Jan 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Arif S. Doctor

The Bombay High Court quashed a municipal stop work notice issued without jurisdiction and natural justice, holding that construction under valid environmental clearance cannot be deemed illegal merely due to pending revised clearance applications, and directed issuance of occupancy certificate pending arbitration of private disputes.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Stop Work Notice Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act Natural Justice

Bhalchandra Haribhau Tingre v. Chairman/Secretary, Kumar City Residence Coop Housing Society Limited

30 Jan 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld a deemed conveyance order under MOFA, ruling that procedural defects from initiating proceedings against a deceased person are curable by subsequent estate representation and that the Competent Authority lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate title disputes or operate as a civil court for res judicata purposes.

property appeal_dismissed Significant deemed conveyance Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act legal representatives nullity

Vivek Babu Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

30 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a disabled employee is entitled to regularization and promotion with arrears in a government-aided college, directing accommodation in aided posts by dislodging incumbents or creating supernumerary posts, quashing contradictory administrative orders.

administrative petition_allowed Significant persons with disabilities reservation government aided posts promotion

Suhas B. Marathe v. Balwant Mahadeo Joglekar

30 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that while a tenant can recover full repair expenses from a negligent landlord, recovery in any year is limited to one-fourth of the yearly rent under Section 23 of the Bombay Rent Act, and upheld the decree accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 23 Bombay Rent Act tenant repairs landlord statutory duty rent control

Sandeep Tanaji Bangar & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

30 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court quashed the Education Officer's rejection of a private school teacher's transfer proposal for failure to grant opportunity to cure deficiencies and directed reconsideration in accordance with law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer approval private school teachers natural justice deficiency cure

Tanangi Kenchappa Gurubala v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

30 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court regularized a full-time teacher’s appointment made in violation of reservation rules, balancing legality with equity, and directed backlog clearance and penalties on the Management.

administrative petition_allowed Significant reservation roster regularization of service illegal appointment backlog clearance

High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Vineeta Srinandan

29 Jan 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court convicted Mrs. Vineeta Srinandan for criminal contempt for issuing a derogatory circular scandalizing the judiciary, sentencing her to one week imprisonment and fine, while accepting the Board's apology and disowning of the publication.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 scandalizing court judicial authority

Wonderchef Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Swaminarayanan Pty Ltd

27 Jan 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court granted a limited 90-day injunction restraining a distributor from disparaging the manufacturer’s products pending arbitration, balancing contractual obligations with free commercial speech.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 interim injunction commercial speech confidential information

Nitin Prabodhchandra Gadekar v. The State Bank of India

27 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The High Court upheld the appellate court's discretion to set aside a judgment on admission in a lease dispute, holding that such judgment requires clear, unambiguous admission and proper interpretation of lease termination provisions under Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission lease determination Section 111 Transfer of Property Act

M/s. Amar Builders v. Champalal Indraraj Sand alias Rahtekar & Ors.

27 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing cross-objections in a civil appeal where the appeal was stayed and not taken up for final hearing, emphasizing the wide discretion under Order XLI Rule 22 CPC.

civil petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay cross-objections Order XLI Rule 22 CPC extension of time

Millan Pradhan v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Jan 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of university rules annulling exam performance for revealing identity and requiring passing all 1st year MBBS subjects before promotion, dismissing the petition challenging these regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unfair means medical education MBBS examination annulment of performance

wp32492023 134e5e89

24 Jan 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court issued procedural directions for removal of office objections and scheduled the hearing dates for multiple criminal appellate matters.

criminal other Procedural office objections interim order listing of matters criminal appellate jurisdiction

Anil Shivajirao Bhosale v. Directorate of Enforcement

24 Jan 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused under PMLA after he completed half the maximum sentence, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA Section 436A CrPC Bail

M/s.N.K Proteins Limited v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Jan 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the MPID Act and the court has discretion to condone delay beyond 30 days under Section 5(3), dismissing the appellant's challenge to the condonation order.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5(3) MPID Act condonation of delay

Sabyasachi Devpriya Nishank v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Jan 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an intoxicated driver charged with rash and negligent driving causing damage, imposing community service and monetary conditions to balance public safety and the accused's future prospects.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail rash and negligent driving intoxication community service

Mangesh Girish Sarjerao v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Jan 2025 · Nitin W. Sambre; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing issuance of a 'Thakar' Scheduled Tribe certificate to the petitioner, holding that affidavits and caste validity certificates of paternal relatives are admissible evidence to discharge the burden of proof.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe certificate Thakar tribe burden of proof caste validity certificate

Shri Dnyaneshwar Baban Katkar v. The Director General and Inspector General of Police

22 Jan 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking correction of date of birth in service records beyond the prescribed five-year period under service rules, holding that the Registration of Births and Deaths Act does not override service conditions and emphasizing the adverse impact of belated changes on service benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant date of birth correction Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1981 Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 service book entry