High Court of Bombay

4,240 judgments

Year:

Madhukar Janardhan Dhole v. The Chief Officer, Baramati Municipal Council & Suchetra Udaysinha Gaikwad

07 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court directed the Baramati Municipal Council to demolish unauthorized construction despite pending civil suit, affirming the municipal authority's duty to act promptly against illegal structures under public law.

administrative petition_allowed Significant unauthorized construction municipal demolition Article 226 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act

Vikram @ Bala Shahaji Sonavane v. Commissioner of Police

07 Feb 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that non-placement of the entire reasoned bail order before the detaining authority does not vitiate the detention order where the bail order's reasons do not affect the grounds for detention.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant preventive detention subjective satisfaction bail order detention order

Ritik Suresh Millil v. State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to a 20-year-old accused in a serious sexual offence case against his minor cousin, emphasizing the need for reformative justice given his age and discrepancies in the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC sexual offences POCSO Act

Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused after over four years' incarceration without trial commencement, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 and balancing it against the seriousness of offences and risk of witness tampering.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial detention

Santosh Pralhad Waghmare v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an under-trial accused after nearly eight years of incarceration without trial commencement, emphasizing the fundamental right to speedy trial and personal liberty under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial detention

Kailas Ramdas Sangle v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Prithviraj K. Chavan

The High Court acquitted a police officer charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt and invalid sanction order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

Roop Kishor Bhootra v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court upheld the Special Court's order allowing NSEL's application under Section 190 CrPC to summon additional accused persons, holding that an accused can file such application and proposed accused have no locus standi to intervene at the cognizance stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 190 CrPC Section 319 CrPC Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act NSEL scam

Smt. Prabhalaxmi Chhotalal Yoganand v. Chief Officer, Diu Municipal Council

07 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The High Court upheld cancellation of a business license after the petitioner relinquished tenancy rights, holding that possession and license rights cease upon surrender of tenancy.

civil petition_dismissed tenancy rights Deed of Release possession business license cancellation

Ghanshyam Maruti Chougule v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

06 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused in a sexual assault case due to unexplained delays and refusal of medical examination, emphasizing that bail observations do not prejudice the trial merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail sexual assault delay in FIR medical examination refusal

Guddu Soubhan Harijan v. The State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused held for nearly seven years without trial commencement, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 and that bail is the rule, jail the exception.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial incarceration

Deepak Manohar Deshmukh v. The State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · Prithviraj K. Chavan

The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove abetment of suicide beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictory dying declarations and lack of overt acts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Section 498-A IPC abetment of suicide dying declaration

Shantaram Sakharam Ghadi v. State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

Tenants cannot challenge eviction notices under the MRTP Act; only landlords have locus, and public interest Town Planning Schemes prevail over alleged tenancy claims.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 Sections 88, 89, 90 MRTP Act tenancy rights eviction notices

Priyanka Balkrishna Jadhav v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

05 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court modified the refusal of approval for upgradation of a part-time teacher to a full-time aided post, directing eligibility after completion of six years on unaided establishment in line with applicable rules and government resolutions.

administrative petition_partly_allowed Significant upgradation part-time teacher unaided post aided post

Surendra Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India

05 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of pro-rata pension to an ex-Air Force JCO discharged before completing qualifying service, affirming that pension entitlement requires fulfillment of minimum service and procedural conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force JCO/OR pension All India Services Rules 1958

Kantilal S/o Chandrakant Khade Patil & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

05 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra State Government to grant pay scale benefits and arrears with interest to Laboratory Assistants as per the 2006 Government Resolution, affirming compliance after repeated Supreme Court dismissals of State appeals.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Government Resolution 27-02-2006 pay scale benefits arrears payment interest on delayed payment

State of Maharashtra v. Tanmay Sunil Gite

05 Feb 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court allowed the State's petition, holding that the third child born after 31/12/2001 to a deceased government servant is not entitled to compassionate appointment under the relevant Government Resolution, irrespective of legitimacy or number of marriages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment Government Resolution 2001 third child restriction illegitimate child

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - 14 v. M/s Buniyad Chemicals Ltd.

05 Feb 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that unexplained credits in an assessee's books, including electronic records, can be fully added as income under Section 68 if the assessee fails to identify beneficiaries, rejecting attempts to evade tax liability by claiming non-maintenance of books or that credits belong to customers.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 68 Income-tax Act unexplained cash credits accommodation entries books of account

Udesh Shantaram Patekar v. Prakash Rajaram Surve

05 Feb 2025 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that an election petition lacking concise material facts and full particulars of corrupt practices as required under Section 83 of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 can be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Election Petition Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 Section 83 RP Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Priyanka Communications India Pvt v. Tata Capital Limited

04 Feb 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that past legal representations by an arbitrator do not warrant substitution under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, and challenges to impartiality under the Fifth Schedule must await the final award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 jurisdiction Fifth Schedule Seventh Schedule

Dharmendra Kumar v. Union of India

04 Feb 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of restricting the number of Civil Services Examination attempts for PwBD candidates based on their vertical category, dismissing the claim for uniform unlimited attempts irrespective of SC/ST or OBC status.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Benchmark Disability Horizontal reservation Vertical reservation Civil Services Examination Rules 2024