High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

B. Suguna v. Smt. Bolla Malathi

11 Feb 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; M.M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court held that a nomination for GPF does not automatically become invalid upon the subscriber acquiring a family without formal cancellation, entitling the original nominee to the entire fund subject to succession claims.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant General Provident Fund Nomination Cancellation of nomination Rule 5(5)(b)

Ravi Manoj Rai v. Union of India & Anr.

11 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to accused Nos. 2 and 4 in a narcotics smuggling case, holding that co-accused statements under Section 67 NDPS Act are inadmissible at bail stage and the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS Section 37 NDPS bail

Shrimati Dr. Gaikwad Rajashri Nitin v. The Deputy Secretary Affiliation Department

10 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that grace marks awarded under university ordinance for securing higher class are valid for eligibility in teacher recruitment and that a government resolution disallowing grace marks cannot be applied retrospectively to deny appointment approval and service continuity.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Grace marks Ordinance 91 Government Resolution 8.3.2019 Clock Hour Basis appointment

Kalyani Aditya Mineral Limited v. Aditya Birla Group Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd.

10 Feb 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court dismissed challenges to arbitrators under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, holding that mere perceived associations without legal incapacity do not disqualify an arbitrator and serious misconduct allegations must be raised before the arbitral tribunal.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14 Arbitration and Conciliation Act de jure inability arbitrator challenge Seventh Schedule

Swanubhuti Jeevraj Jain v. State of Maharashtra

10 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition seeking caste certificate based on the mother's caste, affirming the presumption of the father's caste unless sole maternal upbringing and deprivation are proven.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant caste certificate mother's caste presumption of father's caste reservation

The State of Maharashtra v. Pramila Vitthal Kawale

07 Feb 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court upheld mid-term police transfers made under Election Commission directives as valid and not temporary deputations limited to the election period, overruling the Tribunal's contrary order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer orders Election Commission of India Section 22-N Maharashtra Police Act deemed deputation

Swastik Promoters and Developers v. The Competent Authority & Ors.

07 Feb 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority’s order granting deemed conveyance under MOFA, holding that title disputes lie with civil courts and the Authority’s role is limited to enforcing the promoter’s statutory conveyance obligations.

property petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Section 11 MOFA deemed conveyance competent authority jurisdiction

Madhukar Janardhan Dhole v. The Chief Officer, Baramati Municipal Council & Suchetra Udaysinha Gaikwad

07 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court directed the Baramati Municipal Council to demolish unauthorized construction despite pending civil suit, affirming the municipal authority's duty to act promptly against illegal structures under public law.

administrative petition_allowed Significant unauthorized construction municipal demolition Article 226 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act

Vikram @ Bala Shahaji Sonavane v. Commissioner of Police

07 Feb 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that non-placement of the entire reasoned bail order before the detaining authority does not vitiate the detention order where the bail order's reasons do not affect the grounds for detention.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant preventive detention subjective satisfaction bail order detention order

Ritik Suresh Millil v. State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to a 20-year-old accused in a serious sexual offence case against his minor cousin, emphasizing the need for reformative justice given his age and discrepancies in the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC sexual offences POCSO Act

Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused after over four years' incarceration without trial commencement, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 and balancing it against the seriousness of offences and risk of witness tampering.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial detention

Santosh Pralhad Waghmare v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an under-trial accused after nearly eight years of incarceration without trial commencement, emphasizing the fundamental right to speedy trial and personal liberty under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial detention

Kailas Ramdas Sangle v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Prithviraj K. Chavan

The High Court acquitted a police officer charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt and invalid sanction order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

Roop Kishor Bhootra v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Feb 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court upheld the Special Court's order allowing NSEL's application under Section 190 CrPC to summon additional accused persons, holding that an accused can file such application and proposed accused have no locus standi to intervene at the cognizance stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 190 CrPC Section 319 CrPC Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act NSEL scam

Smt. Prabhalaxmi Chhotalal Yoganand v. Chief Officer, Diu Municipal Council

07 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The High Court upheld cancellation of a business license after the petitioner relinquished tenancy rights, holding that possession and license rights cease upon surrender of tenancy.

civil petition_dismissed tenancy rights Deed of Release possession business license cancellation

Ghanshyam Maruti Chougule v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

06 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused in a sexual assault case due to unexplained delays and refusal of medical examination, emphasizing that bail observations do not prejudice the trial merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail sexual assault delay in FIR medical examination refusal

Guddu Soubhan Harijan v. The State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused held for nearly seven years without trial commencement, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 and that bail is the rule, jail the exception.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 pre-trial incarceration

Deepak Manohar Deshmukh v. The State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · Prithviraj K. Chavan

The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove abetment of suicide beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictory dying declarations and lack of overt acts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Section 498-A IPC abetment of suicide dying declaration

Shantaram Sakharam Ghadi v. State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

Tenants cannot challenge eviction notices under the MRTP Act; only landlords have locus, and public interest Town Planning Schemes prevail over alleged tenancy claims.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 Sections 88, 89, 90 MRTP Act tenancy rights eviction notices

Priyanka Balkrishna Jadhav v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

05 Feb 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court modified the refusal of approval for upgradation of a part-time teacher to a full-time aided post, directing eligibility after completion of six years on unaided establishment in line with applicable rules and government resolutions.

administrative petition_partly_allowed Significant upgradation part-time teacher unaided post aided post