High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation v. Nandkishor Govind Sane
The Bombay High Court held that a settlement agreement arrived during conciliation proceedings is binding on all employees, including non-union members, and complaints for its enforcement are maintainable within limitation from the date of breach.
The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited v. Maharashtra State Electricity Board & Ors.
The court held that MSEB is the real tenant entitled to eviction, rejecting the State Government tenancy claim, and allowed the writ petition setting aside concurrent decrees dismissing the eviction suit.
Royal Realtors Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. v. Shubham/Pallavi/Mayur
The Bombay High Court upheld and decreed the consent terms executed between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, rejecting allegations of fraud and illegality, thereby enforcing the settlement in a joint development dispute.
Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.7 v. M/s. Byramjee Jeejibhoy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that only the registered owner with possession at acquisition is entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, excluding illegal occupants and unauthorized structure owners.
Sopana Bala Kadam v. Vijay Harishchandra Khaire
The Court held that tenancy rights of the tenant-mortgagee over part of mortgaged land survive suspension during mortgage period under Section 25A of the Maharashtra Tenancy Act, allowing purchase rights over that land while rejecting tenancy claims over land possessed by a third-party mortgagee.
Uma Pradeep Divate v. Chandra Gulab Advani & Ors.
The Court held that an assignment of tenancy disguised as a transfer of a running business without genuine intention to continue the business amounts to unlawful subletting, allowing eviction of the tenant.
Prabhat Sadan Properties Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that for compulsorily registrable documents, transfer premium must be computed from the date of execution of the document, not the date of registration, and quashed MCGM's fresh demand based on later rates.
Geeta Mangesh Laud & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that requisitioned premises remain under requisition until physical possession is returned to the owner, validating eviction orders under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 and directing the State to hand over possession to the owner.
Purnima Talkies v. Chief Officer, Dahanu Nagar Parishad
The court held that land acquisition by granting TDR/FSI requires a concluded agreement, and in absence thereof, acquisition must follow the 2013 Act with payment of monetary compensation before demolition.
Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri v. M.S Johnson Dye Works Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld orders directing lessees to deposit outstanding water charges under Order XV-A of the CPC despite primary statutory liability resting on the occupier, clarifying the distinction between water taxes and water charges under the MMC Act.
Shri. Harilal Anurup Awadhia and Ors. v. Prabhakar Shravan Shinde
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant for unauthorized dominant residential use of commercial premises, clarifying that change of user alone suffices for eviction under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act.