High Court of Bombay

5,061 judgments

Year:

Shipping Corporation of India Limited v. Dasu M. Kutty

13 Mar 2061 · M.M. Sathaye
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld compensation for a seaman’s permanent disablement due to heart disease after long service, dismissing the employer’s appeal challenging the award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and N.M.B. Agreement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 permanent disablement National Maritime Board Agreement maritime employment

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

13 Mar 2055 · A. S. Chandurkar; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of BSNL under the HT-II commercial electricity tariff category for 2008-2010, rejecting its claim for industrial tariff benefits without required certification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Electricity tariff classification HT-I industrial tariff HT-II commercial tariff Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission

K. V. Satyamurthy; S.M. Builders v. Golden Beach Co-op Housing Society Ltd.; Competent Authority and The District Deputy Registrar

20 Mar 2045 · ARIF S. DOCTOR

The Bombay High Court upheld the deemed conveyance order under MOFA, ruling that bungalows forming part of a common layout qualify as flats, and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction to grant conveyance despite petitioners' objections.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act deemed conveyance bungalows vs flats definition of flat

Swapnil Prakash Bhogle v. Union of India

08 Dec 2026 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court quashed vague and unreasoned GST cancellation orders for violating natural justice, reviving the petitioner's registration and directing fresh proceedings with due consideration.

administrative petition_allowed Significant show cause notice natural justice cancellation order GST registration

Vina Ahuja v. The Commissioner of Customs (Export)

08 Nov 2026 · M. S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court ordered refund with interest of a wrongly recovered customs amount due to PAN number confusion, directed record correction, and left admitted dues recovery open for due process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant wrongful recovery refund with interest PAN number error customs drawback

Alok Knit Exports Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

02 Nov 2026 · K.R. Shriram; Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued to a company that ceased to exist due to merger is invalid and cannot be cured as a clerical error.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Notice to non-existent company Amalgamation Jurisdictional defect

Balu Namdevrao Mule v. The General Manager, The BEST Undertaking

23 Oct 2026 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court set aside the dismissal of a bus driver due to procedural irregularities in disciplinary proceedings and remanded the case for fresh enquiry respecting natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry principles of natural justice domestic enquiry delegation of disciplinary powers

Darshana Anand Damle v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

12 Oct 2026 · K. R. Shriram; Dr. N. K. Gokhale
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening of income tax assessment under Section 148, holding that granting development rights does not amount to transfer of land and reopening based on a mere change of opinion is impermissible.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Reopening of assessment Development Agreement

Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

14 Sep 2026 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court held that recovery of deficit stamp duty involving dispute over market value must be initiated within ten years under Section 32A, and proceedings under Section 33A beyond this period are barred and invalid.

civil petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Section 32A limitation Section 33A impounding deficit stamp duty

Rachana Developers v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

12 Sep 2026 · Amit Borkar

The court held that a promoter cannot retain open-ended discretion to decide the form of flat purchasers' organisation and that a declaration under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act must be executed by all owners to preclude registration of a cooperative society.

property petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 declaration under MAO Act

Naziya Banu Abdul Hafiz Ansari @ Jabbar Sofi v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

27 Aug 2026 · R.D. Dhanuka; Kamal Khata
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the invalidation of a caste certificate obtained through fraudulent documents, dismissing the petitioner’s writ challenging her disqualification from reserved local body elections.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant caste certificate Maharashtra Scheduled Castes Rules 2012 Other Backward Class vigilance inquiry

M/S Sab Developers v. M/S Vijay Enterprises

12 Aug 2026 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The High Court held that the arbitration agreement survives termination of the main contract and parties must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside the lower court's rejection of the arbitration application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Termination of contract Rescission

Kishore Jetha Somai v. Union of India

06 Aug 2026 · Nitin Jamdar; M. M. Sathaye
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld RBI's termination of a candidate appointed under ST reservation whose caste certificate was invalidated, holding that provisional appointments subject to caste verification can be lawfully terminated and writ jurisdiction does not extend to disputed factual issues.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant provisional appointment caste certificate invalidation Scheduled Tribe reservation termination of service

Namrata Tapan Bose v. Sunita Vilas Gaonkar

04 Aug 2026 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld the Petitioners’ right to dissolve the partnership firm under a final arbitral award, ordered court receiver possession, and forensic audit to protect their interests against Respondents’ contumacious conduct.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Partnership at will Arbitral Award Section 9 Arbitration Act Dissolution of partnership

Nileshkumar Jashvantsinh Parmar & Ors. v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha & Ors.

20 Jul 2026 · S.M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that an amendment application based on a new cause of action arising during trial can be allowed without applying the due diligence test under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging such amendment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC due diligence new cause of action

Rohit Dewan v. Syndicate Bank

12 Jul 2026 · Dipankar Datta, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that an employee can validly withdraw resignation before it becomes effective upon expiry of the notice period, and directed reinstatement of the petitioner whose resignation withdrawal was unlawfully rejected.

labor petition_allowed Significant resignation withdrawal notice period service regulations Syndicate Bank

Kamlakar Motiram Satve and Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

07 Jun 2026 · S.V. Gangapurwala, ACJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court condoned developers' delay in completing flats under the Powai Area Development Scheme, recorded compliance with interim orders, lifted restrictions on further development, and disposed of related public interest litigations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Powai Area Development Scheme Tripartite Agreement interim orders condonation of delay

Purple Products Private Limited v. Union of India

01 Jun 2026 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that the Customs Authorities have jurisdiction under the Customs Act to adjudicate alleged misrepresentation in imports without first resorting to the treaty-based dispute resolution mechanism under Article 24 of AIFTA, which is not incorporated into Indian law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement Article 24

Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd. v. Imagine Realty Pvt. Ltd.

10 May 2026 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

The Bombay High Court held it has jurisdiction to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29-A, refused to substitute the arbitrator for alleged delay and bias, and extended the mandate by six months.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Section 29-A Arbitration and Conciliation Act extension of arbitral mandate substitution of arbitrator jurisdiction of court

Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 v. Citron Infraprojects Limited

30 Apr 2026 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna · 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 2772

The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of prior approvals under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act due to total non-application of mind, invalidating reassessment proceedings under Section 153A and dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153D Income Tax Act prior approval non-application of mind Section 153A Income Tax Act