High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6688-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda without statutory authority violate the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6692-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda without statutory authority or procedural safeguards violate the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6690-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against alleged defaulters violate Article 21 and are unconstitutional without statutory authority and procedural safeguards.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Article 21 Right to travel

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6687-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda allowing public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against alleged defaulters violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, lacking statutory authority and procedural safeguards, and are therefore unconstitutional.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6685-DB

The Bombay High Court invalidated executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars restricting overseas travel, holding such actions violate Article 21 and the Passports Act, 1967.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6679-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against alleged defaulters violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution due to lack of statutory authority and procedural safeguards, rendering such LOCs unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6686-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda violate the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 and are unconstitutional without statutory authority and due process.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6672-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks without statutory authority or due process violate the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6671-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda violate Article 21 and are unconstitutional without statutory authority and procedural safeguards.

constitutional petition_allowed Landmark Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6676-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive instructions allowing public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars restricting overseas travel lack statutory authority and violate fundamental rights under Article 21.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6673-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda permitting public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against defaulters violate Article 21 and lack statutory authority, rendering such LOCs unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6674-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda lack statutory authority and violate Article 21, thereby quashing such LOCs and affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Article 21 Fundamental Right to Travel

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6696-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks under executive Office Memoranda without statutory authority or procedural safeguards violate the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6691-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks without statutory authority and procedural safeguards violate Article 21 and the Passports Act, rendering them unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Article 21 Fundamental Right to Travel

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-OS:6695-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks without statutory authority and procedural safeguards violate Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Rights Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-AS:6671-DB

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars without statutory authority violate the fundamental right to travel under Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against defaulters violate fundamental rights under Article 21 and lack statutory authority, rendering such LOCs unconstitutional.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India

The Bombay High Court held that executive Office Memoranda empowering public sector banks to request Look Out Circulars against alleged defaulters violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and are unconstitutional without statutory authority or due process.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Article 21 Fundamental Rights

Viraj Chetan Shah v Union of India & Anr

· 2024:BHC-AS:1699-DB

The Bombay High Court held that Look Out Circulars issued at the request of public sector banks without statutory authority violate fundamental rights under Article 21 and are unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circulars Office Memoranda Fundamental Right to Travel Article 21

Ashok Mallinath Halsangi v. The State of Maharashtra

· A. S. Chandurkar; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court upheld the disqualification of candidates who submitted multiple applications for the same police constable driver post, affirming the clear prohibition in the recruitment advertisement and rejecting attempts to reinterpret its terms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recruitment advertisement multiple applications clause 11.10 disqualification