High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund v. IndusInd Bank Ltd. & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that the priority of secured creditors under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act, 2002 prevails over provident fund dues under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952, dismissed the writ petition for non-exhaustion of alternate remedies and lack of writ jurisdiction against private financial institutions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 11 EPF Act Section 26E SARFAESI Act

Jagannath Pandurang Waghare v. State of Maharashtra

17 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for raping his minor daughter, discarding flawed DNA evidence but relying on credible victim testimony and statutory presumptions under the POCSO Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault minor victim DNA evidence chain of custody

Vitthal Mahadeo Shelar v. The State of Maharashtra

17 Dec 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Shyam C. Chandak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held the petitioner’s arrest illegal for non-communication of grounds in writing and delayed production beyond 24 hours, quashing remand orders and granting release on bail.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest grounds of arrest Article 22 Constitution production before Magistrate

Shivkrupa Sahakari Patpedhi Limited v. State of Maharashtra

17 Dec 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court held that a statutory auditor's Special Report and an order initiating inquiry under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act are preliminary steps not amenable to revision under Section 154, and quashed the revisional authority's order setting aside the inquiry.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Section 81 audit Section 88 inquiry Section 154 revision jurisdiction

Kum. Mimonee Rakesh Kumbhare v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · SUMAN SHYAM; S. M. MODAK · (2013) 1 Mh.L.J. 180
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the invalidation of the petitioner's 'Halba' Scheduled Tribe status due to lack of pre-constitutional evidence, affirming the Scrutiny Committee's decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Tribe status Halba tribe Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee pre-constitutional documents

Faisal Javed Shaikh v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 4 · Cited by 2

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order against a person in custody for NDPS offences for failure to consider the real possibility of bail and the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing strict adherence to legal safeguards in preventive detention cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail

Ramdev Singh Jadeja; Vishal Mir; Chintan Arvindbhai Desai v. Union Territory of Daman & Diu

16 Dec 2025 · Neela Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Magistrate's rejection of bail for police officers accused of abduction and extortion, affirming the Magistrate's independent discretion to take cognizance despite the investigating officer dropping a key non-bailable offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail abduction extortion police misconduct

Krishna Vijay Gohil v. Union Territory of Daman & Diu

16 Dec 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court upheld the Magistrate's cognizance of serious offences against police officers accused of abduction and extortion, rejecting bail and affirming the Magistrate's independent scrutiny over the Investigating Officer's opinion.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail police misconduct abduction extortion

Dhanji Dubriya v. Union Territory of Daman & Diu

16 Dec 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale

The High Court upheld the Magistrate's cognizance of non-bailable offences against police officers accused of abduction and extortion, rejecting their bail application due to the gravity of offences and conduct during investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail abduction extortion police misconduct

Vikas Rajput v. State of Maharashtra

16 Dec 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale

The High Court upheld the Magistrate's cognizance of serious offences against police officers accused of abduction and extortion, rejecting their bail application and affirming that the Magistrate is not bound by the Investigating Officer's opinion in the charge sheet.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail abduction extortion police misconduct

Jatin Patel v. Union Territory of Daman & Diu

16 Dec 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale

The High Court upheld the Magistrate's rejection of bail for police officers accused of abduction and extortion, affirming that the Magistrate must independently scrutinize the charge sheet and that the gravity of offences and conduct during investigation preclude bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail abduction extortion police misconduct

Mr. Aditya Avinash Sood v. The State of Maharashtra

16 Dec 2025 · Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court rejected bail applications of accused involved in a criminal conspiracy to tamper with evidence by forging medical documents and swapping blood samples in a fatal drunk driving case, emphasizing the gravity of offences and risk of evidence tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail criminal conspiracy forgery of valuable security blood sample swapping

Narendra Babarao Deshmukh v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

16 Dec 2025 · R.I. Chagla; Farhan P. Dubash
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld that LIC’s Reduced Paid-up Policies mature on the originally scheduled date or death, rejecting the petitioner’s claim for earlier maturity under the Non-Forfeiture Regulations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Life Insurance Corporation of India Non-Forfeiture Regulations Reduced Paid-up Policy Date of Maturity

Hitesh Gopal More v. The District Magistrate, Dadra & Nagar Haveli

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for failure to supply grounds and documents in the detenue's language, violating Article 22(5) rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) fundamental rights detention order

Vikas @Papya Ashok Shinde v. Commissioner of Police, Thane & State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unexplained delay and held that individual acts not disturbing public order do not justify detention under the MPDA Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order unexplained delay

Nilofer Ramjan Shaikh v. Commissioner of Police, Pune City & Ors.

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale · 2025 ALL MR (Cri) 357
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for lack of public order disturbance and unexplained delay, emphasizing the strict constitutional limits on preventive detention.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order delay in detention order

M/s. Permanent Magnets Limited v. Mahipat Yadav

15 Dec 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court dismissed the employer's appeal, affirming that applications under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act are maintainable for recovery of previously adjudicated wage arrears and benefits to statutory canteen workers.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act Labour Court jurisdiction wage arrears statutory canteen workers

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Kalpita Enclave Co-operative Housing Society

15 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed the Municipal Corporation's appeal directing removal of obstructing structures on a public DP road, emphasizing public interest over Plaintiffs' claims of incomplete road development.

property appeal_allowed Significant Development Plan road Municipal Corporation public road obstruction injunction

Naresh Prabhubhai Golani v. State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder and robbery due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt, including vitiated identification and unreliable recoveries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together theory Test Identification Parade (TIP) recovery of stolen property

Naresh Prabhubhai Golani v. State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence, particularly invalidating identification and last seen together theories.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together theory identification parade Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act