High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

Mr. Aditya Avinash Sood v. The State of Maharashtra

16 Dec 2025 · Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court rejected bail applications of accused involved in a criminal conspiracy to tamper with evidence by forging medical documents and swapping blood samples in a fatal drunk driving case, emphasizing the gravity of offences and risk of evidence tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail criminal conspiracy forgery of valuable security blood sample swapping

Narendra Babarao Deshmukh v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

16 Dec 2025 · R.I. Chagla; Farhan P. Dubash
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld that LIC’s Reduced Paid-up Policies mature on the originally scheduled date or death, rejecting the petitioner’s claim for earlier maturity under the Non-Forfeiture Regulations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Life Insurance Corporation of India Non-Forfeiture Regulations Reduced Paid-up Policy Date of Maturity

Hitesh Gopal More v. The District Magistrate, Dadra & Nagar Haveli

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for failure to supply grounds and documents in the detenue's language, violating Article 22(5) rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) fundamental rights detention order

Vikas @Papya Ashok Shinde v. Commissioner of Police, Thane & State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unexplained delay and held that individual acts not disturbing public order do not justify detention under the MPDA Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order unexplained delay

Nilofer Ramjan Shaikh v. Commissioner of Police, Pune City & Ors.

15 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale · 2025 ALL MR (Cri) 357
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for lack of public order disturbance and unexplained delay, emphasizing the strict constitutional limits on preventive detention.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order delay in detention order

M/s. Permanent Magnets Limited v. Mahipat Yadav

15 Dec 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court dismissed the employer's appeal, affirming that applications under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act are maintainable for recovery of previously adjudicated wage arrears and benefits to statutory canteen workers.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act Labour Court jurisdiction wage arrears statutory canteen workers

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Kalpita Enclave Co-operative Housing Society

15 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed the Municipal Corporation's appeal directing removal of obstructing structures on a public DP road, emphasizing public interest over Plaintiffs' claims of incomplete road development.

property appeal_allowed Significant Development Plan road Municipal Corporation public road obstruction injunction

Naresh Prabhubhai Golani v. State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder and robbery due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt, including vitiated identification and unreliable recoveries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together theory Test Identification Parade (TIP) recovery of stolen property

Naresh Prabhubhai Golani v. State of Maharashtra

15 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence, particularly invalidating identification and last seen together theories.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together theory identification parade Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Kalpita Enclave Co-operative Housing Society

15 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed the Municipal Corporation's appeal directing removal of unauthorized structures obstructing a public DP road, rejecting Plaintiffs' demand for uniform 13.40 meters road width completion before opening the road.

property appeal_allowed Significant Development Plan road Municipal Corporation public road obstruction Section 314 MMC Act

Irwin Edmund Sequeira & Ors. v. Sale Proceeds of MV Karnika

12 Dec 2025 · Abhay Ahuja
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed a mortgagee's intervention in an Admiralty suit under Rule 1086, holding that intervention depends solely on interest in the vessel or sale proceeds and that scope of defences is to be adjudicated at trial.

admiralty appeal_allowed Significant Admiralty jurisdiction Intervention Rule 1086 Bombay High Court Rules Maritime lien

Federal Express Corporation v. Fedex Securities Private Ltd. & Ors.

11 Dec 2025 · R.I. Chagla

The Bombay High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark FEDEX, holding that their use infringed the plaintiff's registered and well-known trademark despite defendants' reliance on Section 159(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 159(5)

Deputy Collector v. M/s. Vasinaka Sahakari Mandal

11 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that the Reference Court under the Land Acquisition Act has jurisdiction to determine the relevant notification date for compensation calculation, rejecting the acquiring body's preliminary objection.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Reference Court jurisdiction Relevant date of notification Market value determination

M/s. Ramnarain Sons Pvt Ltd v. The Board of Mumbai Port Authority

11 Dec 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that eviction suits instituted before appointment of the Estate Officer under the PPE Act retain jurisdiction in the original court despite subsequent transfers, dismissing the petition challenging Small Causes Court jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 15 PPE Act jurisdiction Small Causes Court

Shri Pundlik Dagu Holgade & Ors. v. Shri Pandurang Kashinath Hire & Ors.

11 Dec 2025 · Gauri Godse
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The court held that a clear sale deed with a condition to repurchase, lacking debtor-creditor relationship, is not a mortgage by conditional sale, and the right to repurchase extinguished after the stipulated period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mortgage by conditional sale sale with condition to repurchase Transfer of Property Act Section 58 debtor-creditor relationship

Afsana Enterprises v. The Assistant Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

11 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court dismissed appeals challenging eviction notices on unauthorized structures on court-controlled land, holding the suits frivolous and an abuse of process, and upheld removal of encroachments with exemplary costs imposed.

property appeal_dismissed Significant custodia legis unauthorized construction Section 351 MMC Act Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement

Erle Benedict Pereira v. Erlyn Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Ltd

10 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court upheld the Plaintiff's right to 900 sq.ft. additional FSI reserved in a 1994 Deed of Conveyance against the Society, granting interim relief restraining redevelopment without honoring this entitlement.

property appeal_allowed Significant Deed of Conveyance Additional FSI Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 Section 11 MOFA

Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India & Ors.

10 Dec 2025 · R.I. Chagla; Farhan P. Dubash
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Court held that ownership of a secured asset under SARFAESI Act transfers only upon issuance of the sale certificate, and an interim moratorium under IBC precludes possession transfer before such issuance.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code interim moratorium ownership transfer

Thermax Limited v. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.

09 Dec 2025 · R.I. Chagla
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award holding the purchaser responsible for GTG breakdown due to improper maintenance and barred consequential damages claims under contract exclusion clauses.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Arbitration Defect Liability Preliminary Acceptance Certificate Gas Turbine Generators

Lokranjan Breweries Private Limited & Anr v. State of Maharashtra

09 Dec 2025 · Somasekhar Sundaresan

The Bombay High Court held that licence fees for country liquor manufacture must be charged uniformly at a flat rate per case based on overall production, striking down arbitrary slab-wise differential treatment violating Article 14.

administrative petition_allowed Significant licence fees CL-1 License Maharashtra Potable Liquor Rules, 1973 Notification dated January 30, 2016