High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Subhash Kantilal Pawar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

22 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition to quash a corruption FIR against a police hawaldar, holding that prima facie material at the investigation stage warrants continuation of proceedings and alternative remedies must be pursued.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Prevention of Corruption Act Article 226 Constitution Section 482 CrPC

Hardik Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

22 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The Bombay High Court allowed a petition directing a further thorough investigation into a murder case due to lapses and incompleteness in the original police investigation, emphasizing the court's power under Article 226 to ensure justice through proper inquiry.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Further investigation Transfer of investigation Murder investigation

Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd

22 Dec 2025 · SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ; GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld CIDCO's cancellation of a tender despite the petitioner being the highest bidder, holding that no vested right arises without issuance of allotment letter and judicial interference in bona fide commercial decisions is limited.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender cancellation highest bidder earnest money deposit judicial review

Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

22 Dec 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ; Gautam A. Ankhand, J
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL seeking CBI investigation into the Lavasa Project, holding that delay, availability of statutory remedies, and prior dismissal of related PILs preclude judicial interference.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation CBI investigation Article 226 Code of Criminal Procedure

Indian Express and Commercial Ventures and Projects Private Limited v. Fundamental Hospitality Private Limited and Another

19 Dec 2025 · Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's claim for interim injunction against the Defendants' use of the mark "HOM", holding that the Plaintiff failed to prove that the abbreviation "HOM" is recognized by the public as its trademark and that there is no prima facie case of infringement or passing off.

civil petition_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off abbreviation as trademark goodwill

Harsh Anil Singh v. The State of Maharashtra

19 Dec 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings against a student accused under the NDPS Act due to absence of any material evidence linking him to narcotic consumption.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c) Section 27

Vishal Ashok Kamble v. The State of Maharashtra

19 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

The High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting claims of provocation and private defence due to the brutal and disproportionate nature of the assault.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder exceptions to murder right of private defence

Hindustan Construction Company v. Mumbai Metro One Private Limited

18 Dec 2025 · Abhay Ahuja
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a Settlement Agreement superseding the original contract and lacking an arbitration clause extinguishes the original arbitration clause, rendering disputes under the Settlement Agreement non-arbitrable and dismissing the application to refer the suit to arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 8 Settlement Agreement Supersession of contract

Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceuticals Corporation Employees’ Union v. The State of Maharashtra

18 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a Conciliation Officer must admit an industrial dispute for conciliation proceedings and cannot refuse on technical grounds, quashing the premature closure of conciliation in this case.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Conciliation Officer Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 conciliation proceedings industrial dispute

Ayyappa Swami v. State of Maharashtra & Rushali Purushottam Gupta

18 Dec 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR alleging wrongful restraint for preventing illegal feeding of stray dogs in a society, holding the obstruction lawful and the FIR an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant wrongful restraint Section 126 BNS Act feeding stray dogs abuse of process

Omkar alias Tedya Umesh Satpute v. State of Maharashtra

18 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order under the MPDA Act, holding that individual criminal acts without broader impact on public order do not justify detention.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act

Jyotirmayasinhji Upendrasinhji Jadeja v. The State of Maharashtra & Damini Kumari Narhari Pratap Singh

18 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of a minor residing in Germany, holding that foreign custody orders and the child's welfare in habitual residence govern custody disputes, and extraordinary writ relief is not maintainable absent unlawful custody.

family petition_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody writ petition foreign custody orders

Amrina Mathew Fernandes v. Rhythm Arvind Goyal

18 Dec 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court canceled bail granted to an accused in a serious assault case, holding that procedural lapses under Section 35(3) BNSS do not apply to offences punishable with life imprisonment and bail cannot be granted solely on technical grounds ignoring the gravity of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail procedural compliance Section 35 BNSS Section 48 BNSS

D. G. M. & A Operated S. A. B. English Medium School through Principal Ashwini Harish Suryawanshi v. Shivaji Laxman Bhamare

18 Dec 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court held that eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act apply only to residential licenses and quashed eviction orders against a school operating under a Leave and License agreement for non-residential premises.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 24 Leave and License Agreement Competent Authority jurisdiction

Suvarna Harishchandra Chavan v. State of Maharashtra

18 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe · 2019 (3) Mh.L.J. 903

The Bombay High Court held that pensionary benefits under the Old Pension Scheme include service rendered in an unaided institution prior to receiving 100% government grant-in-aid, directing pension sanction with interest on arrears.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pension grant-in-aid qualifying service unaided institution

Shraddha Hitesh Raikar v. Hitesh Dattaram Raikar

18 Dec 2025 · Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that a second divorce petition filed under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act based on failure to resume cohabitation after restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable and not barred by res judicata.

family petition_dismissed Significant res judicata Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1A)(ii) restitution of conjugal rights

Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

18 Dec 2025 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that an Agreement To Lease granting only a license without present demise is not a lease and not chargeable with stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

civil petition_allowed Significant Agreement to Lease License vs Lease Stamp Duty Bombay Stamp Act, 1958

wp46292025 b4d200bf

18 Dec 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court adjourned listed matters due to paucity of time and clarified the continuation of ad-interim reliefs until next dates.

other Procedural adjournment daily board supplementary board ad-interim relief

Reliance Defence & Engineering Limited v. M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd

17 Dec 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court directed the return of amounts withdrawn by the judgment creditor under a bank guarantee after the corporate debtor's resolution plan extinguished the arbitral award debt, rejecting the claim for interest and holding the arbitration challenge infructuous.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Arbitral Award Section 34 Petition

Sitaram Ganu Huddar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Abhay Ahuja, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal enhancing compensation for land acquired under the same notification in adjoining villages to a uniform rate of Rs.25 per sq. meter, following Supreme Court precedents.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation Market value Uniform compensation