High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Bhavesh Suresh Kataria v. Kataria Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd.

08 Dec 2025 · Arif S. Doctor
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the mark "KATARIA INSURANCE," holding that the Plaintiff established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and passing off, and the Defendant's adoption was not bona fide.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Mark Infringement Passing Off Section 29 Trade Marks Act Section 35 Trade Marks Act

Christian Rajendran v. The State of Maharashtra

05 Dec 2025 · R. M. Joshi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the conviction of one accused for sexual offences under POCSO Act based on reliable victim testimony and medical evidence, acquitted another accused for lack of proof, and modified sentence of a third accused for failure to report the offence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault victim testimony medical evidence

Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali v. Assistant Director

05 Dec 2025 · Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of bail in a money laundering case involving shell companies, holding that the applicant's acts of cheating and forgery tainted the proceeds as 'proceeds of crime' under PMLA.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant money laundering proceeds of crime shell companies cheating

The Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Sudha Instant Soft Drinks and Essences

04 Dec 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that processed and canned pineapple products do not qualify as 'fresh fruits' under the Bombay Sales Tax Act and are liable to sales tax, overruling the Tribunal's exemption order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Entry A-23 fresh fruits sales tax exemption

New Shree Krishna SRA CHS v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Mumbai

04 Dec 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court directed the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to finalize the rehabilitation list without succumbing to illegal political interference, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory duties under the Slum Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Slum Rehabilitation Authority Annexure-II Slum rehabilitation scheme Extra-legal interference

Vasant Shenoy v. Sanjay Kumar

04 Dec 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a certificate of sale issued by the Court in a public auction does not require mandatory registration under the Registration Act, and possession must be delivered upon payment of stamp duty.

civil appeal_allowed Significant certificate of sale registration act 1908 mandatory registration auction sale

Hany Babu v. National Investigation Agency

04 Dec 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the appellant accused under UAPA due to prolonged pretrial incarceration violating his constitutional right to a speedy trial, applying the principle of parity with co-accused and harmonizing statutory restrictions with Article 21 protections.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail prolonged incarceration speedy trial Article 21

Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. Niket Mehta

03 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court held that a suit against a Trustee of a public trust for recovery of compensation requires prior consent of the Charity Commissioner under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, and failure to obtain such consent mandates rejection of the suit plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 Section 50 MPT Act Section 51 MPT Act Charity Commissioner consent

Villa Realcon LLP v. Chandresh Parbat Gothi

03 Dec 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and directed reference of disputes arising under a 2019 MoU containing an arbitration clause to arbitration, holding that the presence of non-signatory parties in the suit does not preclude arbitration of disputes between parties bound by the arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 8 Arbitration Act arbitration agreement cause of action segregation non-signatory parties

Sha Vijay Anandrao Sawant v. Baramati Nagar Parishad

03 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that landowners deprived of land for public use must receive just and fair compensation under Article 300A, overruling municipal regulations providing nominal compensation and directing acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Article 300A Right to property Just compensation Development Control Regulations

Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

03 Dec 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Shyam C. Chandak
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held the petitioner's arrest illegal for failure to record specific individualized reasons and non-compliance with constitutional safeguards, ordering his release.

criminal petition_allowed Significant arrest procedure Section 35 BNSS Article 22 Constitution individualized reasons for arrest

Nitin Kedu Rajole v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Dec 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging cancellation of appointment for failure to prove project affected status and for unexplained delay in filing the petition.

administrative petition_dismissed project affected person land acquisition recruitment advertisement appointment cancellation

Blessing Amaka Okonko v. State of Maharashtra

03 Dec 2025 · Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court rejected bail to the accused in a narcotics case, holding that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act was met and that the presence of commercial quantity narcotics and risk of absconding justified denial of bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 42 compliance Section 50 personal search bail under NDPS Act

MPD Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. Angel Broking Ltd

02 Dec 2025 · Neela Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that jurisdictional objections not raised during arbitration are waived and that no patent illegality justified setting aside the award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 16 jurisdiction

Jyoti Harsukhrai Joshi & Ors v. Triveniben Bhikhalal Busa & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of tenant for failure to file mandatory application under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act within 90 days, holding the time limit is mandatory and not extendable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 15(3) tenant eviction rent arrears

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Rajashri Pramanik Sable

02 Dec 2025 · Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court upheld the MACT award of Rs. 35.92 lakhs with interest for the death of a minor in a motor accident, affirming enhanced notional income and rejecting appellant's challenge on compensation quantum and contributory negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim minor death compensation notional income multiplier method

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Sanket Dattatraya Mistri

02 Dec 2025 · Aarti Sathe
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a motor accident claim award, holding the bus driver solely negligent and upholding compensation to the injured passenger.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim negligence compensation contributory negligence

Daji Patil Shikshan Sanstha v. The Union of India

02 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court directed authorities to determine eligibility and release arrears of education entitlement grants within eight weeks, ensuring procedural fairness under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 entitlement grants reimbursement educational institutions

Mrs. Sushama C. Pendharkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that an employee appointed by the University of Pune and governed by its service rules is entitled to pension and gratuity despite deployment in a UGC-funded project, directing payment with interest for delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant University employment pension entitlement gratuity payment UGC funded project

M/s. Bella Vista Drycleaners v. Vishwanath Kanojia, Akhil Bhartiya General Kamgar Union and Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court held that a small employer can be represented by an advocate before the Labour Court with leave of the Court and that refusal based solely on the opposite party's objection violates natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 36(3) and 36(4) legal representation Labour Court