High Court of Bombay

3,981 judgments

Year:

Nitin Kedu Rajole v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Dec 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging cancellation of appointment for failure to prove project affected status and for unexplained delay in filing the petition.

administrative petition_dismissed project affected person land acquisition recruitment advertisement appointment cancellation

Blessing Amaka Okonko v. State of Maharashtra

03 Dec 2025 · Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court rejected bail to the accused in a narcotics case, holding that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act was met and that the presence of commercial quantity narcotics and risk of absconding justified denial of bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 42 compliance Section 50 personal search bail under NDPS Act

MPD Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. Angel Broking Ltd

02 Dec 2025 · Neela Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that jurisdictional objections not raised during arbitration are waived and that no patent illegality justified setting aside the award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 16 jurisdiction

Jyoti Harsukhrai Joshi & Ors v. Triveniben Bhikhalal Busa & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of tenant for failure to file mandatory application under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act within 90 days, holding the time limit is mandatory and not extendable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 15(3) tenant eviction rent arrears

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Rajashri Pramanik Sable

02 Dec 2025 · Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court upheld the MACT award of Rs. 35.92 lakhs with interest for the death of a minor in a motor accident, affirming enhanced notional income and rejecting appellant's challenge on compensation quantum and contributory negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim minor death compensation notional income multiplier method

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Sanket Dattatraya Mistri

02 Dec 2025 · Aarti Sathe
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a motor accident claim award, holding the bus driver solely negligent and upholding compensation to the injured passenger.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim negligence compensation contributory negligence

Daji Patil Shikshan Sanstha v. The Union of India

02 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court directed authorities to determine eligibility and release arrears of education entitlement grants within eight weeks, ensuring procedural fairness under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 entitlement grants reimbursement educational institutions

Mrs. Sushama C. Pendharkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that an employee appointed by the University of Pune and governed by its service rules is entitled to pension and gratuity despite deployment in a UGC-funded project, directing payment with interest for delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant University employment pension entitlement gratuity payment UGC funded project

M/s. Bella Vista Drycleaners v. Vishwanath Kanojia, Akhil Bhartiya General Kamgar Union and Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court held that a small employer can be represented by an advocate before the Labour Court with leave of the Court and that refusal based solely on the opposite party's objection violates natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 36(3) and 36(4) legal representation Labour Court

Tata Communications Limited v. State of Maharashtra

01 Dec 2025 · Kamal Khata
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The High Court held that a change in shareholding of a company does not amount to transfer of its immovable property, quashed the demand for unearned income, and set aside the impugned orders for violation of natural justice.

property petition_allowed Significant transfer of shares transfer of property company as separate legal entity unearned income

Venco Research and Breeding Farm Private Limited v. Rashtriya Shramik Aghadi

01 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court set aside the Labour Court's reinstatement order for striking workmen due to lack of formal termination but directed the employer to pay monetary compensation for the period of non-employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F termination of workmen strike

Narendra Ramprakash Podar v. Pragnesh Narayan Podar

01 Dec 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court upheld the Charity Commissioner's orders setting aside trustee change reports due to lack of proper quorum, failure to conduct mandatory enquiry, and procedural irregularities, dismissing the writ petitions challenging those orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 Section 22 enquiry Section 70A revision locus standi

Ramughraha Ramcharita Tiwari v. Alaknanda Gopalkrishna Badale

01 Dec 2025 · M.M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision application challenging eviction under the Bombay Rent Act, holding that purported legal heirs lacked locus and the Appeal Court's bona fide requirement finding was not perverse.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC Bombay Rent Act bona fide requirement eviction

Roshan Jaywant Pagare v. State of Maharashtra

01 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court acquitted appellants convicted solely on the testimony of injured eyewitnesses due to serious doubts arising from previous enmity, lack of corroboration, and disbelieved third eyewitness, emphasizing the need for reliable and corroborated evidence in criminal convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant injured eyewitness false implication previous enmity ocular evidence

Roshan Jaywant Pagare v. State of Maharashtra

01 Dec 2025 · Manish Pitale; Manjusha Deshpande

The High Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder, holding that the injured eyewitnesses' evidence was tainted by previous enmity, lacked corroboration, and was insufficient to overcome reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant injured eyewitness false implication previous enmity ocular evidence

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-19 Mumbai v. Avinash B. Jaising

28 Nov 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT’s dismissal of the Revenue’s appeal, affirming the allowance of set off of short term capital loss against long term capital gain on identical facts as in related family members’ cases, emphasizing consistency in taxing statutes.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Short Term Capital Loss Long Term Capital Gain Set off

Sanket Satish Patil & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil

The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 based on an amicable settlement and no objection from the complainant, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 assault

State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. Ravinder Singh Indersingh Sehgal & Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court held that contractual compensation under Clause 15 does not cap mesne profits, which arise independently from wrongful possession, and upheld mesne profit awards exceeding the contractual sum against State Trading Corporation of India Ltd.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mesne profits lease deed Clause 15 Indian Contract Act Section 74

Indian Link Chains Mfrs. Ltd. v. The Official Liquidator

27 Nov 2025 · Arif S. Doctor
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that a post-commencement Deed of Assignment of company property executed without court validation is void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and refused to ratify the transaction, directing possession to be handed over to the Official Liquidator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 536(2) winding-up Official Liquidator

Deepak Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Nov 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ; Gautam A. Ankhad, J
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a seniority list for Inspectors (Examiner) and directed fresh fixation of seniority in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in K. Meghachandra Singh, emphasizing seniority from date of appointment and overruling N.R. Parmar.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority list direct recruits promotees rotation of quotas