Delhi High Court

102,696 judgments

Year:

INDIAN BANK v. MOHAN MURTI SHANDILYA

09 Feb 2026 · AMIT MAHAJAN · 2026:DHC:1065

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery and false claim of secured creditor status by Indian Bank under Section 340 CrPC, holding the allegations to be an afterthought and continuation of proceedings an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 340 CrPC Section 482 CrPC SARFAESI Act secured creditor

Arjun Singh @ Parth Devnath v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Feb 2026 · Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:1073

Delhi High Court upheld convictions but commuted appellant's sentences to the period already served considering mitigating circumstances and maintained fines.

criminal sentence_modified Significant sentence commutation mitigating circumstances theft IPC Sections 328, 379, 411, 34

Ganesh v. Union of India (Ministry of Railway)

09 Feb 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10274
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of a passenger injured after falling from a running train, holding he was entitled to compensation despite non-recovery of ticket, emphasizing the beneficent nature of railway claims law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident bona fide passenger

Mohd. Shadab v. The State of NCT of Delhi

09 Feb 2026 · Prathiba M. Singh; Madhu Jain · 2026:DHC:1039-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside murder convictions due to lack of intent and pre-existing heart condition, converting them to convictions for voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC.

criminal conviction_modified Significant Section 302 IPC Section 325 IPC murder grievous hurt

Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashwini Kumar, JSC v. M/S MAHAGUN (INDIA) PVT. LTD

09 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD... · 2026:DHC:1083-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals of the Income Tax Department, upholding the Tribunal's decision that TDS on annual lease rent payments to development authorities is required prospectively as per established precedent.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Tax Deducted at Source TDS on lease rent Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rajesh Projects case

Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao and Ms. Mansi Rao, Advs v. STATE & ANR

09 Feb 2026 · JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN · 2026:DHC:1028-DB

Through: Counsel for v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

09 Feb 2026 · JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA · 2026:DHC:1050

Through: Mr. Atul K. Bandhu, Ms. Kusum, Advs v. G.K. NIJHAWAN

09 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR RENU BHATNAGAR, J. · 2026:DHC:1037

Judgment delivered on: 09.02.2026 SATYA PAUL v. ALKA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION AND ANR

09 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. · 2026:DHC:1038

Mr. Abhay Verma, Advs v. KAPIL GURJAR

09 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MAN... · 2026:DHC:1098-DB

Through: Mr. Naved Khan, Adv v. SHRI CHETAN PRAKASH JAIN & ANR

09 Feb 2026 · JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Sin... · 2026:DHC:1253-DB

Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ANR

09 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL · 2026:DHC:1432