Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Nipun Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others

20 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10301-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major wife who voluntarily chose to live with her family, affirming the principle that such writs are not maintainable against consenting adults.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 personal liberty voluntary absence

M/S J AND S PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. HANSALAYA HOLDINGS

19 Nov 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:10926

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by the absolute three-month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing strict adherence to timelines and presumption of receipt upon dispatch.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation Arbitral award challenge Limitation period

Aashish v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) HQRS. & Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10275-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner’s bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies and concealment of material facts by the petitioner.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 83 CGST Act provisional attachment freezing of bank account GST evasion

Davender Kumar Chadha v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 and Anr

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10254-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a rectification order under Section 161 of the CGST Act for failure to provide hearing, emphasizing the mandatory nature of natural justice in tax proceedings adversely affecting the assessee.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 161 CGST Act rectification order natural justice hearing

Manjeet Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10487-DB

The Delhi High Court held that injuries sustained by a BSF personnel while returning from leave on private transport are attributable to government service, entitling him to disability pension under the CCS (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 2023.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules on duty attributability

ORIENTAL INSURNCE CO. LTD v. RAVI JAIN

19 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan

Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation award by excluding mediclaim reimbursement, enhancing loss of income and non-pecuniary damages, and upheld insurer’s right to recover from driver and owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation quantum mediclaim reimbursement future loss of income

Kumar Sanjay Jha v. Union of India

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10255-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging punishment on respondents’ undertaking to decide the matter within eight weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to approach the court again if aggrieved.

administrative other writ petition punishment challenge suspension of sentence administrative decision

Pradeep v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine DLT 711
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a service member whose psychological condition is aggravated by military service is entitled to disability pension, even if the condition’s onset is due to non-service factors.

service_law petition_allowed Significant disability pension military service aggravation psychological condition Central Industrial Security Force

Gulfam v. Commissioner of Customs

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10313-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-issuance of Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under the Customs Act mandates release of seized goods and remanded the matter for proper hearing and adjudication.

administrative remanded Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Section 110(2) Section 110A

PANAAYA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ELECTRONIC TENDER. COM (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10352

The Delhi High Court held that delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition beyond 30 days is condonable under the 2018 Rules, but the impugned order was not an interim arbitral award and thus not challengeable under Section 34.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition interim award condonation of delay

Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital v. M/s Innovision Limited

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10227-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed with a 242-day delay under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Commercial Courts Act, holding that such substantial delay cannot be condoned as it defeats the object of speedy commercial dispute resolution.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Commercial Courts Act, 2015 condonation of delay limitation period

Vikas Kumar v. Union of India

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10322-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a post-judgment Seniority List for Tax Assistants for non-compliance with the Supreme Court's ruling in K. Meghachandra Singh, affirming the prospective application of that decision.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Seniority List Tax Assistant K. Meghachandra Singh N. R. Parmar

Niranjan Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10206-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the change in educational qualifications for Indian Railways Level-1 posts, holding that the recruitment process commenced with the formal advertisement and the employer's prescription of qualifications was valid.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment advertisement educational qualification Indian Railways Central Administrative Tribunal

M/S CLUES NETWORK PVT LTD v. M/S LOREAL

19 Nov 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:10253-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the dispute between Clues Network and L'Oréal by recording a valid settlement agreement addressing counterfeit listings and intermediary liability.

civil settled settlement agreement intermediary liability counterfeit listings e-commerce

Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India, Through Director General- Works C.P.W.D. & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10278-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of long-serving casual workers' claims for regularisation, holding that denial based on absence of employer-employee relationship after judicial findings is unsustainable and amounts to contempt.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularisation casual workers employer-employee relationship Central Administrative Tribunal

State of NCT of Delhi v. Chain Singh

19 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10429

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case, affirming the Trial Court's benefit of doubt due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and reinforcing the principle of double presumption of innocence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal rape Section 376 IPC double presumption of innocence

M/S INOX WORLD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

19 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10440

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of arbitration proceedings under Section 16, holding that the insurance policy's arbitration clause limiting arbitration to disputes over quantum where liability is admitted is valid and not arbitrary under the Constitution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 Section 11(6) Arbitrability

Jatinder Pal Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10434

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 324 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 324 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 528 BNSS

Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10392-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing a Re-Survey Medical Board to reassess a retired Army officer's disability pension claim under Rule 8(a) of the Entitlement Rules, emphasizing the independent right to post-discharge disability pension despite Regulation 72(iii) restrictions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Army Pension Regulations 2008 Entitlement Rules 2008 Release Medical Board

Kiran Gambhir v. Delhi Development Authority

19 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10450

The Delhi High Court held that where delay in allotment of a flat is caused by the authority, the cost payable by the successful writ petitioner must be calculated based on rates prevailing on the date of filing the writ petition, not on later rates.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority MIG flat allotment cost calculation writ petition