Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

SKA Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors Private Limited v. Regional Director (Northern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10261

The Delhi High Court upheld the Regional Director’s order directing a company to change its name under Section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that substantial similarity of company names suffices irrespective of trademark infringement.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 16(1)(a) Companies Act 2013 company name change Regional Director jurisdiction trademark infringement

NDMC v. Kanhaiya Manjhi & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10166-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that school closure without prior approval under Rule 46 DSER 1973 is unlawful, limiting employees' right to absorption under Rule 47, but directed absorption with salary liability apportioned between the school management and NDMC.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Rules 1973 Rule 46 closure of school Rule 47 absorption of surplus employees prior approval for school closure

Murari Lal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10165-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the dowry death conviction under Section 304B IPC due to lack of proximate cruelty evidence but upheld dowry harassment conviction under Section 498A IPC, clarifying the requirement of harassment soon before death and the validity of framing alternative charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC alternative charges

Radha & Ors. v. Sunil Ambulance Service & Anr

19 Nov 2025 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10223

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of an employees' compensation claim, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of all relevant evidence including employment certificates.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 claim petition Labour Commissioner employment proof

Jinte @ Jitender and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:10182

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 308/34 IPC but modified the sentence of appellant no. 1 to release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act considering his conduct and mitigating circumstances.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Probation of Offenders Act Section 4 Probation Act Modification of sentence

BWL Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10174

The Delhi High Court held that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable only on the principal amount and not on pendente lite interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal and upheld by courts.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Post-award Interest Pendente Lite Interest Section 31(7) Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Neelu Chawla v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia

The Delhi High Court allowed examination of witnesses via videoconferencing under its procedural rules and directed enforcement of outstanding costs under Section 35B CPC, setting aside the trial court's refusal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant videoconferencing examination of witnesses Section 35B CPC costs enforcement

Mukesh Swami v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10178

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341 and 354 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Kumar Shanu and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10183

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Jaya v. Union of India

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1851

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical assessment by a specialist Medical Board where discrepancies arose between initial and review medical reports in police recruitment, ensuring fair evaluation of the candidate's fitness.

administrative other Significant medical examination recruitment anaemia haemoglobin count

Naresh Kumar v. State

19 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10212

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and consistent evidence to uphold conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC prosecutrix testimony contradictions and improvements

Virender Chawla & Anr. v. Naresh & Ors.

18 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10245

The High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction protecting the appellants' possession of the disputed property pending trial, setting aside the dismissal of their injunction application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC possession title dispute

Suman Kumar Seth v. Neelu Kapur

18 Nov 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:10895
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding no arbitrable dispute existed as the petitioner’s claim for interest accrued on investment was not supported by the family settlement deed.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Family Settlement Deed Arbitrable dispute

J M Jain Prop Sh Jeetmal Choraria v. Union of India

18 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10505-DB

The Delhi High Court held that presumptions under the Income Tax Act do not apply to GST proceedings but the GST Department can independently scrutinize seized materials to issue a valid Show Cause Notice, dismissing the petition challenging the SCN and the constitutional validity of Section 75(2) of the CGST Act as premature.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 75(2) CGST Act Section 132(4) Income Tax Act Section 292C Income Tax Act

G. Ramakrishna v. State C.B.I.

18 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 4788
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for unauthorized issuance of a Bank Guarantee under the Prevention of Corruption Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors including delay, age, and health.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Bank Guarantee Financial authority Sentencing principles

Shabir @ Shakir v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10428

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery-related offences and directed concurrent running of sentences in two closely connected cases involving the same accused under Section 427 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 427 Cr.P.C. concurrent sentences robbery Section 392 IPC

Sharp Business Systems India L v. UOI & ANR

18 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10218-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that service tax exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST applies only to goods sold with documentary proof, granting relief to the petitioner against tax demand on consumables in composite services.

tax petition_allowed Significant service tax composite services Notification No. 12/2003-ST Finance Act 1994

GRID SOLUTIONS SAS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

18 Nov 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:10137-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued after the limitation period due to delay in electronic dispatch is invalid, quashing the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Notice issuance Limitation period

Pulak M. Pandey v. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

18 Nov 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10232-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a censure recorded after a domestic inquiry, holding that the Single Judge rightly refused to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 227 in absence of any manifest error.

administrative appeal_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction domestic inquiry sexual harassment inquiry

Kavita Kharbanda and Others v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Another

18 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:10145

The Delhi High Court invoked its parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 to appoint the wife of a vegetative state patient as his legal guardian with authority over his medical care and property management.

civil petition_allowed Significant parens patriae jurisdiction legal guardian vegetative state comatose state