Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Vivek Rastogi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Fahiq Siddiqui & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered for cyber fraud under BNS after the parties amicably settled, holding that criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Mohd. Rashid & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Amit Sethi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed Look Out Circulars issued against a personal guarantor in absence of any criminal charges or investigation, holding that banks lack authority to request such LOCs under a quashed Ministry of Home Affairs memorandum.
Taekwondo Federation of India v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports must follow procedural safeguards under the Sports Code before withdrawing recognition of a National Sports Federation and quashed the recognition granted to a parallel body, affirming the petitioner as the sole recognized NSF for Taekwondo in India.
Pawan Malik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the MEA’s order directing a magisterial inquiry into the extradition of an Indian national to Canada, holding that the dual criminality requirement under the India-Canada Extradition Treaty is satisfied by the conduct alleged.
Union of India and Ors. v. 648216 Ex HFO Rakesh Babu Chaturvedi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law apparent on record.
Irshad v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing the rape conviction to attempt to rape due to insufficient medical evidence and procedural lapses, while upholding other convictions related to robbery and assault.
Puneet Kapoor v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Madhu Arora
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner as cognizance was taken beyond the limitation period without condonation of delay or hearing, and the complaint was found to be mala fide and vexatious.
M/S Saraswati Eduvision Pvt Ltd v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging refusal of interim relief by the DRAT in a SARFAESI Act auction dispute, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before invoking Article 226 jurisdiction.
Satpudke Tarkeshwar Dashrath v. Union of India
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the disciplinary punishment order.
Aryan Infraheight P Limited v. Signature Global India Ltd
Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act where cause of action arises outside Delhi and arbitration clauses restrict appointment to a non-appointed arbitrator.
Lalita Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Prayagraj Railway Station, affirming jurisdiction and relying on uniform Indian Railways policy and prior precedents.
Arun Kumar Singh @ Arun Kumar Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it within six weeks, disposing of the petition without granting further relief.
Vijender v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the Indian Coast Guard to grant technical resignation and No-Objection Certificate to an officer confirmed as Navik (GD) to join the BSF as Sub-Inspector, applying relaxed eligibility guidelines.
Dharmendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
A writ petition for re-fixation of seniority is not maintainable without impleading all necessary parties, and failure to do so results in dismissal with liberty to re-file.
M/S RBC FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order lacking reasons, granted the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing and filing reply, and left the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court's pending decision.
Delhi Sales Corporation v. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that payment of tax and interest before issuance of a show cause notice under Section 74(5) CGST Act limits penalty liability to 15%, quashing further penalty demands against the petitioner upon deposit of the said amount.
Manoj Kumar Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for re-fixation of seniority due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, emphasizing the mandatory procedural requirement to include all interested parties in seniority disputes.
Sh. Ram Gopal & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.