Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Ferrero SPA & Ors. v. Abhimanyu Prakash & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:10308

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and partial costs against defendants manufacturing infringing NUTELLA glass jars, applying summary judgment for trademark infringement with no real defense.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement permanent injunction summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

Neena Malhotra & Abhimanyou Malhotra v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Ishayu Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.

19 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving substantive disputes for arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitration agreement Prima facie examination

Manash Sarkar & Ors. v. Shukla Sarkar

19 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10561-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a preliminary decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC cannot be passed without clear admissions and allowed the appeal setting aside the partition decree to ensure a fair trial on disputed facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC preliminary decree partition suit deemed admission

M/S ORCHID INTERNATIONAL v. M/S GOYAL AND GOEL STAINLESS STEEL & ANR

19 Nov 2025 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10281

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, affirming the limited scope of appellate review over arbitral awards and upholding the dismissal of the Section 34 petition challenging the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Section 37 appellate jurisdiction arbitral award

Naved v. Rehana

19 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10622

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against petitioners arising from a property dispute, holding the complaint to be mala fide and an abuse of the criminal process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal complaint mala fide prosecution abuse of process

Sita Devi v. Commissioner of Customs

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10260-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a pending Customs revision petition concerning confiscated gold jewellery and waived warehousing charges due to delay, while leaving substantive rights open.

administrative other Procedural Customs Act, 1962 confiscation revision petition personal hearing

Manmohan Singh Ahuja v. Mahinder Singh Ahuja

19 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10248-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of injunction in a partition suit, holding that a duly signed family settlement is binding absent material evidence of misrepresentation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement Memorandum of Understanding injunction partition suit

Shyamsundar Sharma v. ACIT/Initiating Officer, Benami Prohibition Unit-2, Delhi & Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10372-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Show Cause Notice and provisional attachment under the Benami Act against the petitioner, holding that the Initiating Officer had sufficient material and reason to believe the petitioner was a benamidar, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 Section 24 Show Cause Notice Provisional Attachment Reason to Believe

SKA Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors Private Limited v. Regional Director (Northern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10261

The Delhi High Court upheld the Regional Director’s order directing a company to change its name under Section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that substantial similarity of company names suffices irrespective of trademark infringement.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 16(1)(a) Companies Act 2013 company name change Regional Director jurisdiction trademark infringement

NDMC v. Kanhaiya Manjhi & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10166-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that school closure without prior approval under Rule 46 DSER 1973 is unlawful, limiting employees' right to absorption under Rule 47, but directed absorption with salary liability apportioned between the school management and NDMC.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Rules 1973 Rule 46 closure of school Rule 47 absorption of surplus employees prior approval for school closure

Murari Lal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10165-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the dowry death conviction under Section 304B IPC due to lack of proximate cruelty evidence but upheld dowry harassment conviction under Section 498A IPC, clarifying the requirement of harassment soon before death and the validity of framing alternative charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC alternative charges

Radha & Ors. v. Sunil Ambulance Service & Anr

19 Nov 2025 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10223

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of an employees' compensation claim, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of all relevant evidence including employment certificates.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 claim petition Labour Commissioner employment proof

Jinte @ Jitender and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:10182

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 308/34 IPC but modified the sentence of appellant no. 1 to release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act considering his conduct and mitigating circumstances.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Probation of Offenders Act Section 4 Probation Act Modification of sentence

BWL Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10174

The Delhi High Court held that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable only on the principal amount and not on pendente lite interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal and upheld by courts.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Post-award Interest Pendente Lite Interest Section 31(7) Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Neelu Chawla v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia

The Delhi High Court allowed examination of witnesses via videoconferencing under its procedural rules and directed enforcement of outstanding costs under Section 35B CPC, setting aside the trial court's refusal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant videoconferencing examination of witnesses Section 35B CPC costs enforcement

Mukesh Swami v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

19 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10178

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341 and 354 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Kumar Shanu and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10183

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Jaya v. Union of India

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1851

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical assessment by a specialist Medical Board where discrepancies arose between initial and review medical reports in police recruitment, ensuring fair evaluation of the candidate's fitness.

administrative other Significant medical examination recruitment anaemia haemoglobin count

Naresh Kumar v. State

19 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10212

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and consistent evidence to uphold conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC prosecutrix testimony contradictions and improvements

Virender Chawla & Anr. v. Naresh & Ors.

18 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10245

The High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction protecting the appellants' possession of the disputed property pending trial, setting aside the dismissal of their injunction application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC possession title dispute