Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Gulfam v. Commissioner of Customs

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10313-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-issuance of Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under the Customs Act mandates release of seized goods and remanded the matter for proper hearing and adjudication.

administrative remanded Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Section 110(2) Section 110A

PANAAYA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ELECTRONIC TENDER. COM (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10352

The Delhi High Court held that delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition beyond 30 days is condonable under the 2018 Rules, but the impugned order was not an interim arbitral award and thus not challengeable under Section 34.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition interim award condonation of delay

Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital v. M/s Innovision Limited

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10227-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed with a 242-day delay under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Commercial Courts Act, holding that such substantial delay cannot be condoned as it defeats the object of speedy commercial dispute resolution.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Commercial Courts Act, 2015 condonation of delay limitation period

Vikas Kumar v. Union of India

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10322-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a post-judgment Seniority List for Tax Assistants for non-compliance with the Supreme Court's ruling in K. Meghachandra Singh, affirming the prospective application of that decision.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Seniority List Tax Assistant K. Meghachandra Singh N. R. Parmar

Niranjan Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10206-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the change in educational qualifications for Indian Railways Level-1 posts, holding that the recruitment process commenced with the formal advertisement and the employer's prescription of qualifications was valid.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment advertisement educational qualification Indian Railways Central Administrative Tribunal

M/S CLUES NETWORK PVT LTD v. M/S LOREAL

19 Nov 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:10253-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the dispute between Clues Network and L'Oréal by recording a valid settlement agreement addressing counterfeit listings and intermediary liability.

civil settled settlement agreement intermediary liability counterfeit listings e-commerce

Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India, Through Director General- Works C.P.W.D. & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10278-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of long-serving casual workers' claims for regularisation, holding that denial based on absence of employer-employee relationship after judicial findings is unsustainable and amounts to contempt.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularisation casual workers employer-employee relationship Central Administrative Tribunal

State of NCT of Delhi v. Chain Singh

19 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10429

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case, affirming the Trial Court's benefit of doubt due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and reinforcing the principle of double presumption of innocence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal rape Section 376 IPC double presumption of innocence

M/S INOX WORLD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

19 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10440

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of arbitration proceedings under Section 16, holding that the insurance policy's arbitration clause limiting arbitration to disputes over quantum where liability is admitted is valid and not arbitrary under the Constitution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 Section 11(6) Arbitrability

Jatinder Pal Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

19 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10434

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR under Section 324 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 324 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 528 BNSS

Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar

19 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10392-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing a Re-Survey Medical Board to reassess a retired Army officer's disability pension claim under Rule 8(a) of the Entitlement Rules, emphasizing the independent right to post-discharge disability pension despite Regulation 72(iii) restrictions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Army Pension Regulations 2008 Entitlement Rules 2008 Release Medical Board

Kiran Gambhir v. Delhi Development Authority

19 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10450

The Delhi High Court held that where delay in allotment of a flat is caused by the authority, the cost payable by the successful writ petitioner must be calculated based on rates prevailing on the date of filing the writ petition, not on later rates.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority MIG flat allotment cost calculation writ petition

Ferrero SPA & Ors. v. Abhimanyu Prakash & Ors.

19 Nov 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:10308

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and partial costs against defendants manufacturing infringing NUTELLA glass jars, applying summary judgment for trademark infringement with no real defense.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement permanent injunction summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

Neena Malhotra & Abhimanyou Malhotra v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Ishayu Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.

19 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving substantive disputes for arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitration agreement Prima facie examination

Manash Sarkar & Ors. v. Shukla Sarkar

19 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10561-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a preliminary decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC cannot be passed without clear admissions and allowed the appeal setting aside the partition decree to ensure a fair trial on disputed facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC preliminary decree partition suit deemed admission

M/S ORCHID INTERNATIONAL v. M/S GOYAL AND GOEL STAINLESS STEEL & ANR

19 Nov 2025 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10281

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, affirming the limited scope of appellate review over arbitral awards and upholding the dismissal of the Section 34 petition challenging the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Section 37 appellate jurisdiction arbitral award

Naved v. Rehana

19 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10622

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against petitioners arising from a property dispute, holding the complaint to be mala fide and an abuse of the criminal process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal complaint mala fide prosecution abuse of process

Sita Devi v. Commissioner of Customs

19 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10260-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a pending Customs revision petition concerning confiscated gold jewellery and waived warehousing charges due to delay, while leaving substantive rights open.

administrative other Procedural Customs Act, 1962 confiscation revision petition personal hearing

Manmohan Singh Ahuja v. Mahinder Singh Ahuja

19 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10248-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of injunction in a partition suit, holding that a duly signed family settlement is binding absent material evidence of misrepresentation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement Memorandum of Understanding injunction partition suit

Shyamsundar Sharma v. ACIT/Initiating Officer, Benami Prohibition Unit-2, Delhi & Anr.

19 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10372-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Show Cause Notice and provisional attachment under the Benami Act against the petitioner, holding that the Initiating Officer had sufficient material and reason to believe the petitioner was a benamidar, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 Section 24 Show Cause Notice Provisional Attachment Reason to Believe