Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to stay ICC disciplinary proceedings on sexual harassment allegations, except directing change of the Presenting Officer due to conflict of interest, holding that interlocutory relief is not warranted absent jurisdictional defects or non-misconduct.
M/S WIRETEL SOLUTION PVT.LTD v. M/S ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT INDIA PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of unilateral arbitrator appointment objection, directing the Single Judge to decide the Section 34 petition on merits without influence from interim observations.
Sanjay Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that uncommunicated adverse ACRs cannot be considered in promotion decisions and directed a review DSC ignoring such ACRs, setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's claim.
SI Shivam, PS Seelam Pur v. Shreepal
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's probation order for a convict under Section 397 IPC, affirming that probation can be granted despite mandatory minimum sentences absent a non obstante clause.
Mr. Naresh & Anr. v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Amish Bajaj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Nishit Jain and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Sanjay Khurana v. Income Tax Department Ministry of Finance
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of condonation of nine-month delay in filing revised Income Tax Return, holding that no sufficient cause or genuine hardship was shown under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Yogendra Singh v. C R P F Through Director General & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to refile after impleading necessary parties.
Kuzbayeva Maral v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for regular bail of a foreign national accused of human trafficking and related offences, holding that the prima facie case and incriminating material justified continued custody.
M/S DSI SOLUTION PVT. LTD. v. SH. NARESH KUMAR HOODA
The High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing rectification of an omitted verification signature in the plaint, holding that such defect is curable and the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC applies only after trial commencement by witness examination.
Amita Gandoak v. Harkirat Singh Sodhi and Another
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely due to a prior consent decree to which the plaintiff was not a party, allowing the suit for partition to proceed to trial.
Gaurav Dixit v. Priyanka Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal, holding that sustained mental cruelty was proved and the clean hands doctrine was wrongly applied, thereby granting divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Rahul & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Daya Chand v. State of NCT of Delhi & Karan Vir
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail in a cheating case under Section 420 IPC arising from a civil property dispute, holding that prolonged custody without evidence of tampering and delay in FIR registration justified bail.
Walnut Pictures v. Rajyesh Kumar Patni
The Delhi High Court upheld summary judgment in a commercial suit where appellants admitted liability through correspondence and partial payments, rejecting unsubstantiated defences and allegations of coercion.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Satish Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a police constable for habitual absenteeism, ruling that courts will not interfere with disciplinary penalties unless they shock the conscience or violate natural justice.
Ritu Ravi Prakash v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside disciplinary penalty imposed for unauthorized absence due to arbitrary denial of Child Care Leave, holding the disciplinary process procedurally flawed and penalty disproportionate.
Harjinder Singh v. The State
The High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to unexplained delay, contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony, and lack of corroborative medical evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt.
Madhu Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to treat the writ petition as a reply to the Show Cause Notice, provide hearings to parties, and dispose of the matter expeditiously following due procedure.