Delhi High Court

Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Adv v. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE INT. TAX 1(3)(1) NEW DELHI

Through: Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv v. RAJDARBAR HERITAGE VENTURES LTD

Mr. Shubham Shukla, Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Mr. Ayush and Mr. Mukund Ranjan, Advocates v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD & ORS

& Mr. Nawendu Kr. Pandey, Advocates v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Through: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv. with v. THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR

BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA v. KAMESWAR RAO

Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Ms. Shivpriya, Ms. Harshita Singh, Ms. Anjali Kumari and Mr. Dilip Vyas, Advs v. INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSTIY

Through: Mr. Roshan Lal, Advocate along with v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Parmesh Bali, Advocate along with v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal with Mr. Aekta Vats and Mr. Mohit Nandwani, Advocates v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Through: Mr. Nipun Joshi, Advocate v. OM PRAKASH GARG

Through: Mr. R.V. Singh, Advocate with v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mrs. Rinku Narula, Mr. Anugrah Ekka and Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocates v. USHA DEVI AND ANR

BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA v. KAMESWAR RAO

Rhino Finance Private Limited v. Golden Bag Technology Private Limited

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that electronic delivery of a signed award triggers the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Co.

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of attachment of mortgage properties not purchased from proceeds of crime and directed their restoration to the Resolution Applicant under PMLA in light of insolvency proceedings.

Ex-Constable Virender Singh v. Union of India

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant who voluntarily retires with a disability aggravated by service is entitled to disability pension under CCS (EOP) Rules, distinguishing the case from Army Pension Regulations and dismissing the review petition.

At-Baani Corporate One Tower Suite # 303, 3rd Floor Plot No. 5, District Commercial Centre v. M/S Vyagrah Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.

The Delhi High Court held that Non-Executive Independent Directors cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act without specific material showing control, but the CFO can be summoned, partially quashing the complaint against some directors.

Amit Goyal v. State of NCT of Delhi

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against Amit Goyal and Dharmender Yadav under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and absence of specific incriminating role.

Airports Authority of India v. URC Construction (P) Ltd.

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award granting compensation for delay and escalation in a construction contract, holding the arbitrator’s findings as a plausible view not warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.