Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Bharat Bhushan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10303-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to decide on issuing a vending certificate to a visually disabled petitioner following survey participation, maintaining interim protections for his vending activity.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act, 2014 Certificate of Vending Town Vending Committee disability rights

M/S GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10332-DB

Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders for lack of fair hearing and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A of CGST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Personal Hearing

Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement v. Amlendu Pandey

21 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10302-DB

The High Court held that search and seizure under Section 17 of PMLA do not require a complaint specifically against the person searched and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after setting aside the Appellate Tribunal's order de-freezing the respondent's property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 17 PMLA search and seizure attachment confirmation

Inder Dev Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2-Delhi

21 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10268-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and Faceless Assessing Officer have concurrent jurisdiction to issue reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing petitions challenging JAO's jurisdiction.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Faceless Assessing Officer Section 151A Income Tax Act

Prema Kumari v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11031-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant’s lien cannot be terminated without employer’s timely action and opportunity, quashing the CISF’s refusal to revert a petitioner who was not confirmed in another department due to maternity leave.

administrative petition_allowed Significant lien reversion technical resignation Central Industrial Security Force

Vinayak International Housewares Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court held Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules unconstitutional and, following its omission effective 8th October 2024, quashed all pending proceedings under it, allowing exporters to claim IGST refunds without restrictions imposed by the rule.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Rule 96(10) CGST Rules IGST refund constitutional validity omission of rule

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Anant Ram

20 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10488

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to material contradictions in the sole eyewitness testimony and emphasized the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal eyewitness testimony contradictions in evidence rash and negligent driving

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MC Era II Navin Kumar

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising during service are attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Union of India & Ors. v. JWO G Sasmal (Retd)

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10312-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless rebutted, and limited its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Bharat Singh Tomar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10414

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a genuine settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers of High Court Section 528 BNSS

M/S ARJUN ENGINEERING CO. v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, NORTH DELHI

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10280-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing a GST appeal due to inadequate hearing notice and counsel illness, setting aside dismissal and directing hearing on merits subject to costs.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay principles of natural justice CGST Act 2017 appeal dismissal

Sahil Padma Shinde v. Union of India and Ors

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10305-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification for Indian Coast Guard recruitment, holding that concurrence between medical examinations suffices and distinct medical standards for paramilitary forces are valid.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness axial length paramilitary recruitment Detailed Medical Examination

Union of India & Ors. v. IC 65809 LT COL Sandeep Kumar

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10295-DB

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the respondent’s promotion excluding arbitrary Value Judgment marks and allowing age waiver, ensuring fair assessment under established policy and law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Value Judgment marks Promotion Selection Board Age waiver

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Hav Sanjay Kumar Singh

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Hari Ram Gujar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10291-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions for seniority refixation due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, reaffirming the settled Supreme Court mandate that all affected parties must be impleaded.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority refixation impleadment necessary parties service law

M/S. Jagat Singh Gurcharan Singh v. Saurabh Arora

20 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10339
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenant on bona fide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenant’s challenge and belated documents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Alok Kumar Agarhari v. IIFT & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10298

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a contractual employee, holding that termination in accordance with contract terms without proof of regularization was lawful.

employment petition_dismissed contractual employment termination of service regularization unauthorized absence

Aienaddin Gurgij v. Customs Through Air Customs Officer

20 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:10240
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a commercial quantity heroin case, holding that the statutory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met despite prolonged custody and trial delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity bail heroin

Imran Khan v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:10243
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused caught with commercial quantity heroin, holding that statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act applies and procedural irregularities do not vitiate prosecution at bail stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 commercial quantity bail

Nadeem Ahmad v. Commissioner of Customs

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10277-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court ordered release of a detained gold bar due to non-issuance of mandatory Show Cause Notice within statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act, relying on Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 110 Show Cause Notice Seized goods