Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

M/S Muscle Fuelz v. United Spirits Limited

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7576

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging summoning under Section 138 N.I. Act, holding that admitted signatures invoke presumption of liability and disputed issues require trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Dishonoured cheque

Radha Nath Nandy v. Rajpal

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7575

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging the dismissal of a complaint for criminal trespass due to contradictory evidence and held no jurisdictional error in not summoning the accused at the pre-summoning stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Section 203 CrPC Section 319 CrPC criminal trespass

Khyali Ram and Ors v. Indira Gandhi Hospital and Ors

30 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7559-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal against an order passed on consent with liberty to approach the Single Judge by an appropriate application.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural appeal withdrawal order passed on consent liberty to approach Single Judge Delhi High Court

Anil Dutt Sharma v. Govt. of GNCT of Delhi

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7573

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discretion to limit summoning of defense witnesses to only those relevant, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to summon all eleven witnesses in a corruption trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 243(2) Cr.P.C. summoning defense witnesses discretion of trial court right to fair trial

Satish Kumar v. Directorate of Enforcement

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7572
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a BSF officer accused under PMLA for alleged involvement in cattle smuggling, emphasizing the mandatory twin conditions for bail and the primacy of fundamental liberty rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 45 PMLA Article 21 Constitution of India

Ankush Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7570

The Delhi High Court held that filing of a complaint within the statutory period and taking cognizance precludes default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC even if further investigations continue, dismissing bail applications of Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Section 167(2) CrPC charge-sheet complaint

Kohilika @ Kuhi v. Anubhav Saxena

30 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7564

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed written statement electronically in a divorce case, emphasizing merits over technicalities and imposing costs for procedural delay.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce petition written statement family court electronic filing

Siyaram Bros. (Rajasthan) Pvt Ltd v. Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd

30 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7563

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to make best efforts to dispose of a long-pending civil suit expeditiously, preferably within four months from the next hearing date.

civil other expeditious disposal final arguments time-bound direction trial court

Vimla v. Sanjay Sindhani

30 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7562

The court dismissed the petition to implead a third party in a suit for eviction, holding that impleadment is not warranted where it would convert a simple eviction suit into a complex title dispute.

civil petition_dismissed Significant impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC eviction suit

Aditya Madan v. The State & Ors.

30 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7561

The High Court held that allowance of an amendment to include an additional prayer in a guardianship petition does not guarantee the grant of that prayer, which remains subject to the Trial Court's final decision.

civil other guardianship petition Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 Order VI Rule XVII CPC

Sushma Jindal v. United India Insurance Company Limited

30 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7560

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arises and allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction consumer disputes National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Rashida Khatoon v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7533

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case after finding no direct role in the stabbing and considering settled legal principles on bail in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC serious offences prima facie evidence

BKP Enterprise & Ors. v. Spicejet Limited

30 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7893

The Delhi High Court held that no binding contract existed between the plaintiffs and SpiceJet for Haj operations due to an unexecuted Letter of Intent and fraudulent concealment, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for damages and specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Letter of Intent binding contract fraudulent concealment Haj operations

Raghav Garg v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35 (1) Delhi

30 Sep 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7555-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Assessing Officer's reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on credible information of bogus purchases from non-existent suppliers, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Reassessment Reason to believe

Shyamal Jana & Ors. v. Reliance Commercial Finance Limited

30 Sep 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7694

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator and appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute afresh under DIAC rules.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award unilateral appointment nullity Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.

30 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7548-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order dismissing Revenue's appeal against deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on royalty, stock valuation, warranty provisions, and CSR expenditure under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115JB Transfer Pricing Arm's Length Price

Pragati Kesharwani v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:7896

The Delhi High Court upheld ONGC's cancellation of a disabled candidate's appointment on medical grounds, affirming employer's prerogative to enforce medical standards and rejecting the binding nature of the Chief Commissioner's recommendation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 medical fitness reasonable accommodation pre-employment medical examination

M/S MILI MARKETING PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD. & ANR.

30 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7409

The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondents.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

M/S PARASRAMKA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD & ANR.

30 Sep 2024 · C. HARI SHANKAR · 2024:DHC:7410

The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension to the mandate of the learned Arbitrator under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondents.

other petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

M/S MORAN PLANTATIONS PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD & ANR

30 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7411

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by four months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings