Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Suhail Ahmed Khan v. Union of India

27 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:7515-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the hereditary appointment of the Shahi Imam and his son lacks legal validity without Wakf Board ratification and directed authorities to ensure proper management and protection of Jama Masjid.

administrative other Significant Shahi Imam Jama Masjid Wakf Board appointment of Imam

Vishnu Verma and Ors v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7495

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Sunny Anand & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7490

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Karan Tejpaul & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7499

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent powers

Kajol Gupta v. Sarthak Jain

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7554

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final limited opportunity to conclude cross-examination in a divorce proceeding despite prior refusals, imposing costs for delay.

family appeal_allowed cross-examination matrimonial dispute trial court discretion procedural delay

Varun Gupta v. Suman Grover & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner limited cross-examination on a subsequently filed certificate under Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act and disposed of related petitions in a recovery suit.

civil appeal_allowed Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 certificate of electronic record cross-examination

Sawan Khokhar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7498

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Union of India v. Mahender Singh

27 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:257-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order setting aside disciplinary punishment imposed without furnishing UPSC advice to the charged officer, reaffirming the requirement of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings UPSC advice natural justice non-supply of documents

ARN INFRASTRUCTURES INDIA LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-28 DELHI & ORS.

26 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 148 beyond limitation is barred unless supported by valid findings, affirming that no additions can be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during search, while preserving the Revenue's reassessment powers under Sections 147/148 subject to statutory conditions.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149(1) Section 150

Chandra Global Finance Ltd v. ITO Ward 6(1) New Delhi & Anr

26 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7439-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued on grounds of mere change of opinion, reaffirming that reopening assessments requires tangible reasons to believe income has escaped assessment beyond previously considered facts.

tax petition_allowed Significant reassessment change of opinion Section 147 Income Tax Act Section 148 Income Tax Act

Apoorvi Sood v. Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology

26 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh

The Delhi High Court held that faculty appointments made through a regular selection process against sanctioned posts must be treated as regular despite contractual terms, directing NSIT to regularize the Petitioners' services with consequential benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of appointment contractual appointment selection committee sanctioned posts

Radico Khaitan Ltd v. M/S Raina Beverages & Ors.

26 Sep 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7727
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Radico Khaitan Ltd. against defendants for infringing its registered trademark and copyright in the "Magic Moments Remix" trade dress, holding that the defendants' use constituted infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement trade dress passing off

TATA CAPITAL LTD v. UNITECH ASSOCIATES & ANR

26 Sep 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7667

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed exploration of mediation before adjudication.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 30(1) sole arbitrator appointment

Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.

26 Sep 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7671

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed the arbitrator to encourage mediation before adjudication.

other petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 30(1) sole arbitrator appointment

Shri Aruj Seth & Ors. v. State (NCT. of Delhi) Through SHO, PS. Tilak Nagar & Anr

26 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7437

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Sh Ravi Kant & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

26 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7436

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute case following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

R P FOAM HOME (P) LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

26 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7445-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reopening of the petitioner's income tax assessment for AY 2011-12 under Section 148, holding that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment based on new information.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Reopening of assessment Reason to believe Section 143(1) processing

M.R Apparels Private Limited v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - 6

26 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7518-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the revision of the appellant's tax assessment under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for failure to verify dishonoured cheques related to the sale of immovable property.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 263 Assessment order Erroneous order

Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.

26 Sep 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7658

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed exploration of mediation before adjudication in a loan dispute.

other appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 30(1) Section 12

Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.

26 Sep 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7659

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed the arbitrator to encourage mediation before adjudicating disputes arising from a loan agreement.

other petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 30(1) Section 12