Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Dr Monika Bansal v. Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed timely payment of salary arrears due to retrospective promotions, rejecting budgetary constraints as justification for delay.
Chander Bose v. Madhu Bansal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the registration of a second FIR as a permissible counter-complaint by the accused in the first FIR when it discloses a distinct cause of action.
Mahender & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Nigam Prakash & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Akash Pack Tech (P) Limited v. M/S Today Tea Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as time barred, holding that the appellant failed to provide a credible and sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, especially given contradictory explanations and prior participation in the suit.
Rohit Madan v. Aditya Madan
The High Court upheld the executing court's payment direction but allowed the judgment debtor to submit a payment schedule and part payment for consideration.
Gaurav Enterprises v. Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tender conditions for security services, holding that tender requirements are within the exclusive domain of the issuing authority and that exclusion of bonus from the price bid is permissible if reimbursed separately.
Sudhir Kumar Dhingra v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a DDA flat allotment due to improper service of notices and directed re-allotment of a similar flat, emphasizing that delay caused by administrative lapses does not bar relief.
Sushma v. State NCT of Delhi
Pre-arrest bail was denied to the mother-in-law accused of dowry harassment leading to the unnatural death of her daughter-in-law, emphasizing the statutory presumption under Section 113B Indian Evidence Act and the necessity of custodial interrogation.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Balbir Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner must approach the Punjab & Haryana High Court as the cause of action arose there.
MD Shakil v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC after considering hostile witness testimony, prolonged custody, and imposing stringent conditions to mitigate risks.
Danish & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to release funds for continuation of treatment of children with rare diseases and mandated streamlining of medicine procurement to uphold patients' right to health.
Ayra Roy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed release and consolidation of assets left by deceased parents to their minor child, including provident fund and insurance claims, and urged empathetic treatment of outstanding loan dues.
Viphil Jain v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the kingpin of a spurious anti-cancer injection racket, holding that his central role and risk of evidence tampering outweigh parity with co-accused granted bail.
Rustam Beg (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly in a suit for permanent injunction, emphasizing judicial discretion and fairness while imposing costs for delay.
Mahender Singh & Ors. v. Hukam Chand
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to grant an effective opportunity for cross-examination when affidavits were supplied on the same day contrary to its own order for advance copy, emphasizing procedural fairness.
M/S SPELL ORGANICS LTD v. M/S APSOM TURNER PVT LTD & ANR
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s challenge to the deletion of a defendant under Order I Rule 10 CPC, permitting the defendant to lead evidence and directing the Trial Court to decide mis-joinder issues afresh.
Bhim Singh v. Ram Kumar
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's cryptic order granting conditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC and directed a fresh, reasoned consideration of the application.
CS Construction Company Pvt Ltd v. Excelling Geo and Engineering Consultant Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the DIAC coordinator's administrative order reassessing arbitrator's fees separately for claim and counter claim, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdictional error or exceptional circumstances.