Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Peter A Fernandes v. O P Manchanda & Anr.
The High Court held that applications under Order VII Rule 10/11 CPC at the stage of final arguments are generally unnecessary and that personal appearance directions must be reasoned, disposing of the petition as not pressed.
Som Dutt Sharma v. Munni Lal
The Delhi High Court allowed tenants a final opportunity to complete cross-examination of their witness despite a five-year delay, imposing costs to deter further delay.
Manjeet Plastic Industries & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical disqualification of bidders in a government procurement process for failing to meet eligibility criteria, while directing refund of forfeited Bank Guarantee pending lawful proceedings.
Attal Plastics v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging technical disqualification from a government tender, holding that fresh documents post disqualification cannot be entertained and tender eligibility criteria must be strictly followed.
M/S NF INFRATECH SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical and financial evaluation of bids in a government procurement tender, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the qualification and ranking of successful bidders based on financial, technical, and Make in India compliance criteria.
Sujeet v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and conspiracy case due to lack of prima facie evidence connecting him to the crime, emphasizing the need for verified evidence at the bail stage.
Shashank Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Interim bail on medical grounds was denied as the accused's medical condition was stable and adequate treatment was available in jail despite the seriousness of the charges.
Delhi Development Authority v. M/S Naraindas R Israni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitrator's reasonable contract interpretations and factual findings on claims related to delay, damages, and interest.
Trodat GmbH & Anr. v. Addprint India Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of permission to manufacture a self-inking stamp design, holding it did not infringe the registered designs of the appellants under the Designs Act, applying the informed user test and limiting appellate interference in interlocutory orders.
Idresh Ali v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the deemed acceptance provision of the CCS Pension Rules does not apply to CRPF personnel, directing the respondents to decide the petitioner’s voluntary retirement application within a fixed time while upholding the transfer order.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted injunction against the respondent's use of the deceptively similar mark ACNESCAR, holding it infringed the appellant's registered pharmaceutical trademark ACNESTAR.
Sunil Yadav & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses resolving all matrimonial disputes including maintenance and custody.
Kartar Singh v. State (NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a theft case, observing that his identity was not conclusively established and material witnesses had been examined, subject to stringent conditions.
Narender v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to a petitioner suffering from serious spinal injuries, emphasizing the need for specialized treatment outside custody under strict conditions.
Arjun Sarkar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that contraband quantities recovered from co-accused can be aggregated under Section 29 to invoke the statutory bail bar under Section 37 for conspiracy involving commercial quantity.
Pradip Barman v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail, holding that quantities of narcotics recovered from co-accused can be combined under conspiracy to attract the bail prohibition for commercial quantity offences under the NDPS Act.
People Educational Society v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-release of grant-in-aid by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs for lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum conveniens.
Ved Kumari @ Vaijanti Mala v. Bharat Bhushan and Ors.
The High Court held that a suit for partition and rendition of accounts relating to different properties is not barred by a prior settlement concerning other properties and set aside the dismissal of the suit without notice.
Sandeep Kumar Srivastava and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that empanelment of advocates as government counsel is discretionary and no legal right exists to claim inclusion, dismissing the petition challenging omission from the empanelled counsel list.
Barun Kumar v. M S Groupe Seb India Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's rejection of leave to defend in a cheque bounce recovery suit, emphasizing that leave to defend is the rule and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the defendant's jurisdictional and other objections.