Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Sudipta Kumar Mandal v. State NCT of Delhi

05 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3678

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere possession of live cartridges without conscious knowledge or intent does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession mens rea Section 25 Arms Act quashing of FIR

Nisha Khan @ Nazma v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3677

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking FIR registration and investigation transfer in a death case, emphasizing the availability of alternate remedies under the CrPC and absence of foul play.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR registration Article 226 Section 156(3) CrPC Section 174 CrPC

Hari Om Singhal v. University of Delhi

05 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3510
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside a debarment order issued without a show cause notice, affirming that natural justice mandates an opportunity of hearing before blacklisting a contractor.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant debarment show cause notice natural justice opportunity of hearing

M/S S AND S CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNION OF INDIA

05 May 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:3531

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual clause extinguishing the right to invoke arbitration within 30 days is void under Section 28(b) of the Indian Contract Act, and appointed a sole arbitrator despite delayed invocation.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator Indian Contract Act Section 28(b) Limitation period

M/S Supreme Infrastructure India Limited v. Freyssinet Memard India Pvt. Ltd.

05 May 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:3483
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte arbitral award due to non-receipt of mandatory Section 21 notice and unilateral appointment of arbitrator, holding that arbitration proceedings did not validly commence and limitation for challenge had not begun.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 21 notice Unilateral appointment of arbitrator Ex parte arbitral award

Perfect Cargo Movers Private Limited & Ors. v. Ram Murti Paul

05 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3515

The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interlocutory order final disposal

Deepak Mehta v. AJ Capstone Infotech Pvt Ltd

05 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3514

The court held that a zero-interest loan advanced to an employee as part of employment does not constitute a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, and allowed the petitioner to withdraw the challenge to the trial court's dismissal of the application.

civil petition_dismissed Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VII Rule 11 CPC Commercial dispute Loan agreement

Chandna Singh Rakshit v. Rajeev Rakshit

05 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3314-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's delayed appeal challenging maintenance awarded under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that the income assessment was reasonable and delay in filing the appeal was unjustified.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 affidavit of income

Kedarnath Gupta v. M/S Gunjan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

05 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3449-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court modified a restraint order to limit fund transfer restrictions to securing Rs. 15 crores under a settlement deed and allowed bank account disclosure under judicial supervision.

civil appeal_allowed restraint order settlement deed bank account disclosure civil appeal

Commissioner of Police & Ors. v. Sandeep

05 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3450-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination for a police constable candidate declared unfit due to a finger deformity, emphasizing the need to show impairment of duty performance and upholding delay as a ground for dismissal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical examination fitness for appointment fixed extension deformity delay and laches

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Shruti Mishra

05 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3448-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination for a candidate declared medically unfit due to inconsistent medical reports, emphasizing fairness in public service appointments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical examination Central Administrative Tribunal fresh medical board medical fitness

Hem Kumar; Samarth Choudhary v. Capital Land Builders Pvt Ltd & Ors

05 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3291-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's belated application to recall a witness for further cross-examination on documents already exhibited and examined, to prevent undue delay in a long-pending civil suit.

civil appeal_dismissed recall of witness cross-examination Registrar of Companies Annual Returns

Harsh Mariwala v. Pramod Kumar

05 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:3278
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Marico Ltd. and its officials for alleged misbranding, holding that the complaint lacked prima facie material, statutory compliance was established, and the accused were improperly summoned without specific allegations of personal involvement.

criminal petition_allowed Significant misbranding Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 26 D&C Act Section 202 CrPC inquiry

MS XXX v. State and Anr

05 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3470

The Delhi High Court upheld anticipatory bail granted post-chargesheet and cognizance, clarifying that anticipatory bail remains maintainable even after dismissal of regular bail on jurisdictional grounds without remand or custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 170 CrPC Section 437 CrPC Section 438 CrPC

Akash v. The State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

05 May 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3360

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual assault case after the prosecutrix retracted allegations against him at the bail stage, emphasizing that gender or literacy cannot discredit initial statements and balancing the accused's right to liberty with the seriousness of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail sexual assault prosecutrix retraction Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023

The Commissioner CGST Delhi South Commissionerate v. M/S HAAMID REAL ESTATE PVT LTD

05 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3340-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals against CESTAT orders in service tax matters lie exclusively to the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not maintainable.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax transfer of development rights appeal maintainability Central Excise Act 1944

Anshuman v. Union of India & Ors.

05 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3342-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment within four weeks, reserving the petitioner's right to challenge the decision thereafter.

administrative petition_allowed compassionate appointment writ petition administrative delay direction to decide

Anita Sharma v. Mukandi Devi & Ors.

05 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3429

The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interim orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging such an order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interim order maintainability

Sammaan Capital Ltd. v. Bhupinder Singh Rana

05 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1894

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from publishing defamatory content on social media, balancing freedom of expression with the plaintiff’s right to reputation in a loan dispute context.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction defamation social media freedom of expression

Petitioner in person v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

05 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:3386-DB

The Delhi High Court mandated installation and effective monitoring of flow meters on all sewage treatment plants and directed cooperation among agencies to prevent Yamuna River pollution and waterlogging in Delhi.

administrative other Significant Sewage Treatment Plants Flow meters Yamuna River pollution Delhi Jal Board