Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Crystal Crop Protection Limited v. Safex Chemicals India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the dyeing agent or pigment is an essential element of the plaintiff's patent and dismissed the interim injunction application as the defendants' products lacking this element do not prima facie infringe the patent.
Ajay Kumar and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, emphasizing the futility of continuing criminal proceedings.
Akash Bisht v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving intermediate quantity of charas, holding that the statutory bar under Section 37 does not apply and bail is justified given the trial stage and petitioner’s antecedents.
Cholpon Bisht v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a foreign national accused in an NDPS case involving intermediate quantity of Charas, holding that statutory bail bar under Section 37 does not apply and foreign nationality alone cannot deny bail when passport is seized.
Karan Kochhar and Ors v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, applying Supreme Court precedents to prevent further animosity.
Radhey Shyam & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 498A IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of maintenance proceedings.
Pawan Kumar Mittal v. Vijay Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an unreasoned refusal of ex parte injunction in a trademark infringement suit and remitted the matter for fresh consideration of injunction, waiver of service, and appointment of Local Commissioner.
Karan Arora and Ors. v. State of Delhi NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC following a mutual divorce and amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust.
Himanshu Yadav & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 308, 452, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between the parties, affirming the Court's power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unfair or an abuse of process.
Mohd Danish v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for regular bail in a case involving serious allegations of sexual assault, blackmail, and digital exploitation supported by forensic evidence, holding that such matters require trial and bail is not warranted at this stage.
Sachin Tomar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 and 509 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, reaffirming the court's power to quash proceedings to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.
Umesh Chand Tyagi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of excess GPF payments made due to employer’s bona fide mistake without employee fault is impermissible after retirement and quashed the recovery, directing refund with interest.
Sonia v. Sita Ram
The High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(b) CPC without a finding of undervaluation and correct valuation, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's order.
J M Traders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to defective service of notice and lack of personal hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
IE Venture Fund I v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 4 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-claim of carry forward loss in subsequent years does not preclude settlement of a dispute relating to reduction of loss under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
National Research Development Corporation & Anr. v. M/S ARDEE HI-TECH PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding the arbitration notice valid and within limitation, applying Section 14 of the Limitation Act liberally, and directing appointment of an independent arbitrator in line with Supreme Court precedents on impartiality.
Rajender Prasad v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute, leaving merits and limitation issues to arbitration.
JM Traders v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication order passed without personal hearing and directed fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
MMR Electricals v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, Ward106, Zone 4, Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a sales tax demand order, holding that the petitioner had opportunity to be heard and must pursue remedy by filing an appeal under the CGST Act.
Charu Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication orders and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.