Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/S FRESH FEEL APPARELS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order and directed the petitioner to file an appeal, leaving the validity of the impugned notification pending before the Supreme Court.
M/s Shivam Plastic v. M/s Subhash Manufacturing House
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex parte decree in a commercial suit due to mitigating circumstances of the defendant's father's illness, subject to deposit of decretal amount and undertaking, restoring the matter for trial.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. SHIWENDRA KUMAR YADAV
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between Axis Finance Limited and Shiwendra Kumar Yadav.
Axis Finance Limited v. Ritesh P Akhande
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into merits.
Upadhyay v. National Council for Teacher Education
Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) to entertain writ petition against NCTE's withdrawal of recognition due to substantial cause of action arising within Delhi, remanding matter for merits consideration.
M/S KAVISH ISPAT v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders and notifications extending time limits, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and leaving the validity of the notifications to the Supreme Court's pending decision.
Gurukirpa Enterprises v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for violation of natural justice and allowed the petitioner to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S RELIANT FACILITY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of personal hearing and directed fresh proceedings, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under judicial consideration by the Supreme Court.
Alaknanda Steel v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford a personal hearing, granted the petitioner an opportunity to reply, and left the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court adjudication.
G-TECHNOLOGIES v. COMMISSIONER OF DGST & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for violation of natural justice and granted the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sangeeta Goel v. Sales Tax Officer, Class II, Avato, Ward 23- Zone 2, Trade and Tax Department, N.C.T. of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and penalty orders passed without considering petitioner's reply or personal hearing, remanding for fresh adjudication while leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
World Art Press v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-communication of the Show Cause Notice and directed fresh adjudication after personal hearing, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Tanishka Steel v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing due to procedural lapses, pending Supreme Court's decision on validity of extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act.
M/S. JINENDER PAPER MART v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASSII/AVATO WARD 12, ZONE-2, DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order due to denial of hearing caused by suspension of GST registration and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Fair Deal Cars Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to provide mandatory pre-consultation notice and personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S Reliant Facility Management Private Limited v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of personal hearing and directed fresh proceedings, leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S SHIVANGI POLY PRODUCT v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition challenging GST show cause notice and order but granted time to file appeal, pending Supreme Court’s decision on validity of limitation extension notifications under GST Act.
M/S Garg India Plastics v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of hearing and portal access, granting the petitioner opportunity to reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.
M/S Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a rectification application against a GST demand order while leaving the validity of the impugned notification extending adjudication timelines open pending Supreme Court decision.
Shree Krishna Steel Traders v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court permits appeal against GST adjudication order while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act to be decided by the Supreme Court.