Delhi High Court

36,663 judgments

Year:

Tanishka Steel v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others

06 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3486-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper service of show cause notice on an inaccessible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST portal show cause notice Section 168A CGST Act personal hearing

Outlook Publishing India Private Limited v. R R Solution

06 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3481-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the suit for fresh evidence on production of original magazines, holding that photocopies alone are inadmissible under Section 62 of the Indian Evidence Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 62 Indian Evidence Act Commercial Courts Act 2015 Recovery suit Advertisement agreement

Sans Frontiers v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Drawback

06 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3480-DB

The Delhi High Court directed release of pending duty drawback payments to the petitioner subject to an undertaking, pending final adjudication of the related Supreme Court appeal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant duty drawback Export Oriented Unit Customs Act Show Cause Notice

Sans Frontiers v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Drawback

06 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3480-DB

The Delhi High Court directed release of pending duty drawbacks withheld due to an alert on the petitioner’s Import Export Code, following a Supreme Court stay on related adverse orders.

administrative petition_allowed Significant duty drawback Import Export Code Customs Department extended period of limitation

Ankur Agarwal v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Anr.

06 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3477-DB

The Delhi High Court directed GST authorities to enable the petitioner to submit the PMT-03 undertaking online for re-crediting rejected IGST refunds, providing administrative assistance to resolve technical issues.

tax petition_allowed GST refund PMT-03 form undertaking submission GST portal

Jyoti Mehra v. Kamal Kant

06 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3370-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a divorce petition for want of evidence, granting the appellant a final opportunity to lead evidence subject to costs.

family appeal_allowed divorce petition Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 failure to lead evidence adjournment

Kanwar Surjeet Singh v. Daljit Singh Pal

06 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3484

The Delhi High Court held that an oral partition of joint family property in 1998 was validly effected and proved by conduct and documents, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for fresh partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral partition joint family property preponderance of probabilities possession by co-owner

Goethe-Institut E.V. v. Abhishek Yadav & Anr.

06 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3337

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction protecting the plaintiff's prior user rights in the mark MAX MUELLER BHAVAN against defendants' passing off by use of identical marks for German language education services.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off prior user rights trademark registration interim injunction

TRODAT GMBH & ANR. v. ADDPRINT INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.

06 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3336

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant to manufacture and market a proposed alternate stamp design, holding it does not prima facie infringe the plaintiffs' registered designs under the Designs Act, while permitting plaintiffs to challenge the new design at trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant design infringement registered design Designs Act 2000 ex-parte injunction

Kanta Devi & Ors. v. Union of India

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3397
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a compensation claim under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, holding that absence of a valid railway ticket on the deceased negated his status as a bonafide passenger entitled to compensation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal statutory compensation bonafide passenger valid railway ticket

Bimla Devi v. The State & Ors.

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3289

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of probate of a duly executed Will excluding natural heirs, holding that absence of suspicious circumstances and proper attestation validate the Will under the Indian Succession Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will execution and attestation Probate Testamentary capacity

Shri Bijay Singh & Anr. v. Union of India

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3327
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's order rejecting compensation, holding that the claimants failed to prove the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died due to an untoward incident on the train.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident bona fide passenger

Mohini Devi & Ors. v. Union of India

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3338

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the claimants failed to prove the deceased was a bonafide passenger involved in a railway accident.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 compensation claim bonafide passenger

Anoop Sharma v. Bhushan Kumar Narula & Ors.

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3326

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the nullification of society elections, holding that voting rights depend on payment of maintenance charges and that the appeal became infructuous following directions for fresh elections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant society elections Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association voting rights CAM dues

Chander Shekhar & Anr v. Union of India

06 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3411

The Delhi High Court held that a passenger traveling with a valid railway ticket who dies due to accidental fall from a moving train is entitled to statutory compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, overruling the Railway Claims Tribunal's denial based on ticket validity and negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident statutory compensation

Siddharth Jain v. Nitin Jain

06 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3408
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the father of the parties is not a necessary party to a recovery suit between brothers and refused to allow his impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Order I Rule 10 CPC necessary party impleadment recovery suit

Ram Meher LR v. Mukesh

06 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3407

The High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to present oral and written arguments in a long-pending civil suit, emphasizing the right to fair hearing especially when dependent on legal aid.

civil appeal_allowed final arguments legal aid counsel right to be heard closure of oral arguments

Radhika Julka v. Gaurav Julka

06 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3406

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a divorce petitioner's application for an admission-decree, holding that vague denials do not amount to constructive admission in matrimonial cruelty cases.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC constructive admission cruelty divorce

B M Tiwari v. Ramdin Gupta

06 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3405

The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of written statement and affidavit within the 120-day limit in a commercial suit, imposed costs for delay, and directed fresh hearing of amendment application.

civil petition_allowed Significant written statement affidavit of admission/denial Order VI Rule 17 CPC commercial suit

Indravati and Ors. v. Mukesh and Ors.

06 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3404

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to implead the deceased plaintiff's daughter in a suit for cancellation of deed, holding that she was neither a necessary nor proper party and could seek separate relief.

civil petition_dismissed impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC necessary party proper party