Delhi High Court

36,211 judgments

Year:

Ram Babu & Ors. v. Union of India

09 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3675
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the dismissal of a railway accident compensation claim, holding that the deceased was not proven to be a bona fide passenger who fell from the train, given the nature of injuries and lack of credible evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railways Claims Tribunal Act Railways Act Section 123(c) Railways Act Section 124A bona fide passenger

Pankaj Chauhan v. The State

09 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3693

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal charges under Sections 498A, 406, 354, and 376 IPC in a matrimonial dispute due to lack of prima facie evidence and inconsistencies, emphasizing prevention of abuse of legal process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 354 IPC Section 376 IPC

Union of India v. Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd.

09 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2023 INSC 931
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The court held that a contractual 15% markup on materials and labor applies only to extra items and does not bar claims for additional expenses due to contract prolongation, but loss of profits claims require concrete evidence and cannot be hypothetical.

civil appeal_partially_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 patent illegality contract prolongation overheads and profits

Shri Anil Mehra & Anr. v. Kusum Devi & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3620

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition under Section 115 and 151 CPC based on a bona fide settlement between parties involving payment of Rs. 5,00,000/- and withdrawal of the suit.

civil petition_allowed Section 115 CPC Section 151 CPC settlement withdrawal of suit

M/S Durga Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs

09 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3529-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned a 1610-day delay in filing a customs appeal due to the appellant director's medical condition and the COVID-19 pandemic, restoring the appeal for merits hearing subject to costs.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 129A(5) condonation of delay duty drawback

Mukesh Kumar Garg v. Union of India & Ors.

09 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3532-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalties for fraudulent Input Tax Credit, holding that writ jurisdiction is not appropriate when statutory appellate remedies exist and petitioners must come with clean hands.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act Section 122 penalty writ jurisdiction

Porto Emporios Shipping Inc. v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Indian Council of Arbitration

09 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3610
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, the court must refer parties to arbitration upon prima facie existence of a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny and leaving issues of waiver and non-arbitrability to the Arbitral Tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 5 Section 8 Judicial intervention

HDB Financial Services Ltd v. Suresh Kumar Dabla

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3521

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s directions for production of complete summoned records and dispensed with the Managing Director’s personal appearance based on the petitioner’s assurance, emphasizing mandatory compliance with court process.

civil petition_dismissed summoned record compliance with court process personal appearance trial court directions

Naresh Kumar Garg v. BTW India Pvt Ltd

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3520

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to examine his witness subject to additional costs, warning against further delays.

civil appeal_allowed adjournment examination of witness cost imposition delay in proceedings

Vinay Aggarwal v. Har Bai (Deceased) Through LRs

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3519

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant to lead evidence as a witness despite earlier closure of his right, subject to conditions and costs, to ensure a fair trial without undue delay.

civil appeal_allowed right to lead evidence cross-examination defendant witness trial court discretion

ARN Infrastructure India Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Tuhina Bhargava and Anr

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3518

The Delhi High Court directed directors against whom arrest warrants were issued in execution of a decree against a company to appear before the State Commission, allowing them to file applications and ensuring execution proceeds with due opportunity to be heard.

civil other Execution proceedings Arrest warrants Directors' liability Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Shri Krishan Kumar Jain (Deceased Through Lrs) v. Smt Alka Jain

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3517

The court dismissed the petition challenging conditional leave to defend but granted liberty to the petitioners to appeal against the decree and the conditional leave order.

civil petition_dismissed conditional leave to defend deposit condition Fixed Deposit Receipt decree

Sandeep Pandey v. Nuevo Polymers Pvt Ltd

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3516

The Delhi High Court declined to direct time-bound disposal of a civil suit at the final arguments stage, emphasizing parties' cooperation and judicial restraint.

civil petition_dismissed time-bound disposal final arguments civil suit trial court

Shabnam Burney v. Union of India & Ors.

09 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:3525-DB

Delhi High Court upheld demolition of unauthorized Madrasi Camp encroachments after ensuring rehabilitation under JJ Policy, emphasizing urgency due to monsoon-related waterlogging.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant demolition notice unauthorized encroachment rehabilitation Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015

Yadav v. Shri Raju Grover & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3527

The Delhi High Court directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to expedite final arguments and dispose of the claim petition on a day-to-day basis due to the petitioner’s exceptional financial hardship and prolonged suffering.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Motor Accident Claims Tribunal expeditious disposal adjournment

Pushpender v. Sonia Choudhary

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3487-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld interim custody with the respondent and directed the Family Court to decide custody and visitation after hearing both parties, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the interim order.

family appeal_dismissed Family Court custody children school admission

Arun Sachdeva v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3505
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioners accused of cheating and forgery in property transactions, emphasizing that bail is the rule and refusal the exception, especially where investigation is complete and procedural safeguards were not followed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences cheating forgery

Rajender @ Kallu v. State GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3488

The Delhi High Court dismissed a parole petition filed prematurely without awaiting the competent authority’s decision and noted procedural irregularities and adverse antecedents against the petitioner.

criminal petition_dismissed parole competent authority exhaustion of remedies procedural compliance

Chirag Snehkant Vora v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3494

Anticipatory bail granted to accused due to lack of direct incriminating evidence and weak CCTV footage failing to establish prima facie involvement in jewellery fraud.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail CCTV evidence conspiracy recovery of stolen property

Sharanjit Kaur Kohli v. Ramandeep Singh Kohli

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3468-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on grounds of mental and physical cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the findings and emphasizing cumulative conduct and preponderance of probabilities as the standard of proof.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty physical cruelty Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)