Delhi High Court

35,876 judgments

Year:

Al Hamd Tradenation v. Phonographic Performance Limited

13 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3695

The Delhi High Court granted a compulsory license to an event organizer for public performance of sound recordings, holding that unreasonable license fees by the copyright owner constitute refusal under Section 31(a) of the Copyright Act.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant compulsory license copyright sound recordings license fee

Praveen Kumar v. Pooja Arya

13 May 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3627

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order for the wife and child, emphasizing actual income and caregiving duties, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of financial disclosures.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. interim maintenance notional income

Dinesh Aneja v. State Through Government of NCT of Delhi

13 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3630

The Delhi High Court upheld forfeiture of security deposit for the petitioner's failure to strictly comply with court-imposed conditions for travel abroad during criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail permission to travel abroad forfeiture of fixed deposit receipt compliance with court conditions

Shiva @ Vikas v. The State & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3643
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act based on the reliable testimony of the child survivor and corroborative medical evidence, dismissing the appeal despite delay in FIR and hostile witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness testimony POCSO Act sexual assault Section 29 POCSO presumption

Sonu Dahiya v. State NCT Govt of Delhi

13 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3674

The Delhi High Court modified a furlough order to reduce surety requirements based on the petitioner's circumstances, allowing release on furnishing one surety and a personal bond.

criminal petition_allowed furlough surety personal bond release conditions

Seema Khatri v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3629

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious offence case after the victim retracted allegations and the investigation was complete, subject to conditions to ensure trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail retraction of allegations witness tampering charge sheet

Abhay Kumar Yadav alias Pintu v. The State NCT of Delhi

13 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:3636

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in human trafficking case considering prolonged custody and trial delays, subject to strict conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed human trafficking bail immoral traffic prevention act victim statements

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Swaraj International

13 May 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:3671

The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate cannot order revaluation of seized goods after adjudication proceedings have conclusively determined valuation under the Customs Act, limiting the Magistrate's role to certifying inventory under Section 110(1B).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 110(1B) revaluation of seized goods magistrate jurisdiction

Anshul v. The State of NCT of Delhi through SHO PS Geeta Colony

13 May 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:3670
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of dowry-related cruelty soon before death and that an extramarital affair alone does not constitute cruelty under Sections 498A or 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC

Murari Gupta; Sohel Rishabh; Nilesh Bhardwaj; N R Varun v. Vijender @ Vicky

09 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:10241

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte decree due to invalid service of summons, converted the summary suit into an ordinary suit, and directed deposit of security to protect the decree-holder during pendency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree service of summons Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC Order V Rule 17 CPC

Jindal Poly Films Ltd v. ACIT Central Circle-30 New Delhi

09 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3500-DB

The High Court held that in abated assessment proceedings under Section 153A, the Assessing Officer can complete assessment irrespective of incriminating material found during search, setting aside the ITAT order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act abated assessment incriminating material search and seizure

Schneider Electric India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22 2 New Delhi & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3961-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to pass a consequential assessment order within the prescribed limitation period renders the proceedings time-barred, deeming the return accepted and entitling the petitioner to refund with interest.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153 limitation assessment proceedings time-barred consequential order

Schneider Electric India Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22 2

09 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3962-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure by the Assessing Officer to pass a consequential order within the prescribed time after an ITAT remand renders the assessment proceedings time-barred, entitling the petitioner to refund of taxes paid with interest.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153 limitation Assessment Year 2006-07 Time-barred assessment

Atul Kumar Verma and Ors v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3503-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that height fractions of 0.5 cm or more must be rounded up at the Physical Standard Test stage in recruitment, dismissing review petitions challenging this interpretation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Physical Standard Test Medical Examination Test height measurement rounding off

Mahboob Khan and Ors. v. Union of India Through the Secretary & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3501-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging transfer orders, holding that until cadre status is adjudicated, the petitioners remain in their original cadre and cannot claim demotion.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer orders administrative exigencies cadre status multi-tasking staff

Yateendra Kumar v. Union of India

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3499-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's dismissal of a petitioner's claim for extension of retirement age, directing fresh adjudication in light of intervening High Court and Supreme Court judgments granting parity to doctors.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal age of superannuation veterinary doctors parity in retirement age

GLOMET CORP LLP v. UNION OF INDIA

09 May 2025 · DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2025:DHC:3721-DB

The Delhi High Court held that absence of an explicit mandatory condition for Earnest Money Deposit submission with the bid precludes disqualification for delayed EMD, dismissing the petition challenging the tender award.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Earnest Money Deposit EMD exemption Micro and Small Enterprises tender conditions

Lokesh Prabhakar v. Archna Prabhakar

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3760-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking overnight custody, modified interim visitation rights to apply only to the minor son, and allowed fresh applications for visitation to be decided independently by the Family Court.

family appeal_dismissed child custody visitation rights family court interim order

M/S KJP AND ASSOCIATES v. DEPUTY ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

09 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3751-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to accept TDS credit supported by deductor's confirmation and bank deposit details despite unavailability of portal data, ordering expeditious processing of the petitioner’s refund claim for AY 2007-08.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Tax Deducted at Source TDS credit Section 154 rectification

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Saurabh Tiwari

09 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3493-DB

The court held that a medical unfitness declaration based solely on radiological findings without specialist clinical correlation is invalid and directed a specialist examination before finalizing appointment fitness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness Review Medical Examination Board Radiology Report specialist consultation