Delhi High Court

36,211 judgments

Year:

Anglo-American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Ltd. v. MMTC Ltd

09 May 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:3495
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that objections alleging fraud cannot be entertained during enforcement of a final arbitral award under section 36 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, and such challenges must be raised only under section 34 within the prescribed time.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Enforcement Section 36 Arbitration Act Section 47 CPC Objections Judicial Intervention Arbitration

Bhavreen Kandhari v. Shri C. D. Singh and Ors.

09 May 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:3491

The Delhi High Court vacated its interim orders restraining tree felling permissions for 50 or more trees, deferring supervision to the Supreme Court-appointed Central Empowered Committee, while maintaining restrictions for fewer trees pending SOP finalization.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994 Central Empowered Committee Tree felling permissions Interim orders

Narinder Singh Bogarh v. Union of India

09 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5394

The Delhi High Court held that provisional arrest warrants under the Extradition Act require urgency and pending extradition proceedings, and anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is available despite Section 25 of the Act, dismissing the petitions as the warrants had lapsed without extradition proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Extradition Act, 1962 Provisional Arrest Non-Bailable Warrant Anticipatory Bail

Sh. Farman & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3496

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR compromise in criminal cases Article 226 Constitution Section 528 BNS 2023

Deepak v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

09 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3867

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 323, 509, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement and withdrawal of proceedings by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita amicable settlement compromise deed

Jai Mahadev Auto Deals v. The State NCT & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4020

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-prosecution where the complainant was present and willing to proceed despite counsel’s absence due to technical issues, restoring the complaint for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act non-prosecution dismissal of complaint cost imposition

Arun Kumar Jindal v. Central Bureau of Investigation

09 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3534

Anticipatory bail was denied to a senior railway engineer accused of large-scale bribery and conspiracy, as the court found overwhelming evidence and procedural compliance by the investigating agency.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail corruption Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17A PC Act

Mohd Rashid Alis Shakir v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3535

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of robbery and attempt to murder after nearly seven years of custody, emphasizing the prolonged detention and advanced trial stage despite the gravity of offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail prolonged detention snatching attempt to murder

Kapil Dev v. Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.

09 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:4900
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking investigation into alleged corrupt practices by the petitioner’s father-in-law, holding that matrimonial disputes and disputed factual allegations do not warrant writ jurisdiction absent statutory cause of action.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ petition matrimonial dispute corrupt practices

IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. STAR HOSPITALITY

09 May 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:4400

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to the plaintiff against the defendant for unauthorized use of the deceptively similar trademark 'SOCIAL AFFAIR', holding it to be trademark infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction registered trademark

The State (NCT of Delhi) v. Sanaul Khan

09 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4312

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to unreliable and contradictory testimony of the prosecutrix.

criminal appeal_dismissed rape sexual assault prosecutrix testimony sole testimony

SI Kiran Dayal v. Awadh Raj

09 May 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:3819-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned delay and granted leave to appeal against the acquittal in a POCSO sexual assault case, emphasizing the need for prima facie scrutiny at the leave stage without detailed reappraisal of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant leave to appeal condonation of delay POCSO Act sexual assault

Vikram Singh v. FIITJEE Ltd and Anr

09 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4085

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the arbitration clause in the employment service rules to adjudicate the petitioner’s dues dispute, directing arbitration under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed arbitration clause service rules employment dispute appointment of arbitrator

Rahul Jain v. FIITJEE Ltd. & Anr.

09 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4084
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and does not extend to merits of the dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Appointment of arbitrator Scope of judicial scrutiny

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sh Ravinder Kumar & Anr

09 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3607

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal and upheld compensation awarded to a workman injured in an employment-related accident despite absence of formal medical records, relying on admitted facts and credible testimony.

labor appeal_dismissed Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship compensation for injury insurance liability

M/S D S GLOBAL PVT LTD v. M/S IND SYNERGY LTD

08 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3157

The Delhi High Court clarified that its earlier judgment set aside the impugned order issuing warrants of arrest, recalling those warrants and allowing the executing court to proceed further.

civil petition_allowed clarification impugned order warrants of arrest executing court

Hari Singh v. Suresh Pawar

08 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5518

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of repeated applications for cross-examination and additional evidence in Section 138 NI Act cases, emphasizing finality and prevention of abuse of process.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 311 CrPC cross-examination additional evidence Negotiable Instruments Act

Bhana Ram Choudhary v. State NCT of Delhi

08 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3754
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity opium case, holding that conscious possession and the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act apply, precluding bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act conscious possession commercial quantity

Sh. Narender Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

08 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3437

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS settlement in matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Tejasswi Sharma and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3435

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute