Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Gayatri Gupta v. Bimla Devi

25 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4523

The Delhi High Court held that title is not to be adjudicated in landlord-tenant ejectment suits and prior findings on title do not operate as res judicata, allowing the plaintiff liberty to file a fresh suit for possession based on prior possession or title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant landlord-tenant suit title of property res judicata prior possession

Sona Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. v. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

25 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:4515

The Delhi High Court held that a lessee cannot adjust the security deposit against lease rent during the notice period and directed payment of rent as an interim measure under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lease Deed Interest Free Refundable Security Deposit Section 9 Arbitration Act Interim relief

Sona Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. v. Brightpoint India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

25 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:4514

The Delhi High Court held that a lessee cannot adjust the security deposit against lease rent during the notice period and directed payment of rent as an interim measure under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lease Deed Interest Free Refundable Security Deposit Lease Rent Section 9 Arbitration Act

M/S DIESEL S.P.A v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4527

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Diesel S.P.A. against defendants for unauthorized use of the 'DIESEL' trademark alongside their own mark, emphasizing the impermissibility of bare denials under the Commercial Courts Act and applying the beneficiary test for online infringement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement DIESEL trademark SMART COLLECTION passing off

M/S KENZO SA v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4526

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against defendants using the 'KENZO' trademark on counterfeit products, affirming trademark infringement and territorial jurisdiction based on online accessibility.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement counterfeit products permanent injunction territorial jurisdiction

M/S GIORGIO ARMANI S.P.A. v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4530

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for infringing Giorgio Armani's trademarks through co-branded counterfeit products promoted online.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Co-branding

M/S LVMH FRAGRANCE BRANDS SA v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4525

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for co-branding counterfeit products with the registered trademark 'GIVENCHY', affirming liability based on online use and territorial jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Co-branding

M/S BVLGARI SPA v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4524

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for unauthorized use of the 'BVLGARI' trademark in promoting counterfeit products via social media and online platforms.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement counterfeit products permanent injunction territorial jurisdiction

M/S CALVIN KLEIN TRADE MARK TRUST v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4528

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants for unauthorized use of Calvin Klein trademarks, affirming territorial jurisdiction and denying damages for lack of sales evidence.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement permanent injunction territorial jurisdiction co-branding

M/S YVES SAINT LAURENT PARFUMS v. M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4529

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for infringing Yves Saint Laurent's registered trademarks through co-branded counterfeit products promoted online.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction commercial courts act

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sinochem India Co. Pvt. Ltd.

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:4517-DB

Depreciation on intellectual property rights is allowable under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act when the assets are used in trading business activities, and disallowance solely for non-use in manufacturing is unjustified.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation intellectual property rights Section 32 Income Tax Act trading business

Ajay Maini v. State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Jul 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4518
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust involving financial transactions, given documentary evidence and non-cooperation with investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC cheating

Rahul Gupta v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8191

The Delhi High Court granted bail protection to the petitioners accused under Sections 420 and 34 IPC upon their compliance with deposit conditions and cooperation with the investigation, subject to specified safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 420 IPC Section 34 IPC protection against arrest

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption v. Lahore Hospital Society

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:8322-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of income tax appeals involving tax effect below Rs. 50,00,000 as not pressed per departmental circular, leaving the question of law open without adjudicating merits.

tax appeal_dismissed Procedural Income Tax Appeal Tax Effect Threshold Circular No. 3/2018 Disposal as Not Pressed

Anant Gupta v. Mis Irish Global Services Pvt Ltd & Ors.

25 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8353

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions for non-prosecution due to failure to serve respondents despite court directions.

civil petition_dismissed non-prosecution service of respondents dismissal of petition court directions

Vivekanand Sah v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:8523-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging recruitment for Constable (GD) in RPF due to non-availability of vacancies and limitation, directing petitioners to apply under the fresh 2018 advertisement.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment Constable (GD) Railway Protection Force vacancies

PUNJ LLOYD LTD v. HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:9146-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed Punj Lloyd Ltd.'s commercial appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to file an application before the Single Judge without expressing any opinion on the merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal liberty to file application civil procedure High Court of Delhi

Meena Tyagi v. Rajinder Sharma

25 Jul 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4599

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonor Legally enforceable debt Loan agreement

S Farhan Husain v. Dr. Shamim

25 Jul 2018 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1645-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld that eligibility for recruitment must be determined as on the application deadline, and retrospective recognition of qualifications cannot validate candidates not qualified on that date.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant eligibility date retrospective recognition Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 Gazette notification

G & G Enterprises v. Commissioner of Customs

24 Jul 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4487-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's delayed appeal against a customs order due to non-receipt of the original order, directing revival of the appeal subject to deposit of a specified amount and hearing on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay customs order appellate tribunal CESTAT