Delhi High Court
58,461 judgments
Umesh Parkash Ghai v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging bail denial, holding that the charge-sheet was filed within the prescribed 90-day period excluding the remand day, thus negating the accused's right to bail under Section 167(2) CrPC.
Rakesh v. State
Delhi High Court modified appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under sudden quarrel exception and reduced sentence to time served, directing victim compensation.
Yashika Kapoor v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the amended CBSE Examination Bye-law restricting name changes in academic records after result publication and dismissed the petition seeking such a change.
Shamim Bano v. Jalaluddin
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that no substantial question of law arose and upholding the trial and appellate courts' findings against the appellant.
Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence v. Vinod Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a Central Excise fraud case due to incomplete investigation and lack of incriminating evidence against the respondent.
Avin Khandelwal & Anr v. Balbir Singh & Ors
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for motor accident death claim by applying parity in earning capacity and awarded interest excluding delay period.
Sunita & Ors v. Rajan & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation in a motor accident claim by adding future prospects and applying the correct multiplier, while disallowing loss of love and affection following Supreme Court precedent.
Rajesh Kumar Kaim v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that resignation under LIC Pension Rules results in forfeiture of pension benefits and the residuary provision cannot override this express rule, dismissing the petition for pro-rata pension.
Brajendra Kumar v. Kumud & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that appeals against maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C. are not maintainable and the proper remedy is criminal revision, allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file such revision.
State v. Deepak
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal of the accused under sexual offence charges and convicted him for lesser offences of assault and stalking due to lack of proof of sexual intent.
State v. Charan Singh
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to inconsistent identification and lack of forensic evidence linking him to the offence.
Ashish Kumar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a bank manager accused of conspiracy in demonetization-related money laundering and corruption cases, emphasizing prolonged custody without charge and imposing strict conditions.
Anurag Diksmx v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the petitions seeking quashing of an IT Act investigation but extended interim protection against coercive steps for one week to allow further legal recourse.
Ramshobhitdas v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the petitions seeking quashing of criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with the petitioner bound by an undertaking to appear at trial.
Rakesh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and forgery case after considering his cooperation with investigation and absence of direct demand or payment allegations.
Rajat @ Ajay Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 308/34 IPC arising from a neighborly dispute after the parties amicably settled and undertook to maintain peace.
Rajat @ Ajay Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 308/34 IPC arising from a neighborly dispute after the parties amicably settled and undertook to maintain peace.
Amar Yadav & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a family dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences, emphasizing the futility of continuing criminal proceedings in such cases.
Virender Pandey v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 419, 468, 471, 120B, and 34 IPC, considering his cooperation with investigation and absence of payment, subject to bail conditions.
Usman v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that claimants are entitled to the higher compensation amount under the amended Railway Accidents Compensation Rules or pre-amended amount with interest, directing payment of the enhanced sum in a railway accident claim.